The High Court · 2025

5. I\Ir. P. srikanth.Tglov. 9/9. lqtq p. Ranga Reddy, Aged about 34 years, occ Business, R/o. H.No. 2-1-9311, Upperpaiii, Rajendra [lagar, Ranga'Reocly, Telangana.

6. P. Madhusudhan.ngg.gy,_s./9. f. Jaqardhan Reddy, Aged about 34 years, occ .u B usiness, N o. 2-1 -T I 1 lB2, Venkateshwara colo ny, Nagar, Ranga Reddy, Telangana. 7. Mr. P. srikanth.Bgldv. Q/9._!at9 Business, R/o. H.No. 2-1-9311, Upperpaiii, Rajendra Ilagar, nanga Red.lv, Telangana. p. Ranga Reddy, Aged about 34 years, occ p-perpa lli, Rajehd ra

8. P. I\Iadhusudhan.ngg.gy,_s.i9. f. Janardhan Reddy, Aged about 34 years, occ B usiness, Rl/o. 2-1 -7 I 1 132, Ven kateshwara corony, U p"perpalli, Rajehd ra Nagar, Ranga Reddy, Telangana. f. i. S.ripal R"9dy, S/9. Late P. Ranga Reddy, Aged about 29 years, Occ Business, No. 2-1-9311, Upperpaili, Rajendra Nlagar, Ranga Reddy, Telangana.

10. P. Dhanna Reddy, S/o. Late P. Narsimha Reddy, Aged about 44 years, Occ Business, No.2-4-471NG$, PLNR Apartment, Pillar No. '182, Upperpalli, Rajendra Nagar, Ranga Reddy, Telangana. ....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of ft/andamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents more particularly Respondent No. 2lo 4 herein in removing the illegal construction despite passing a speaking order vide 31O/TPS/C-11IRJNRJGHMC|2024, dated 19-10-2024 based on the complaints raised by the Petitioner and earlier Showcase Notice vide 310/TPS/C-11IR.TNR/GHMC12024, dated 03-10-2024 constructing beside H.No. 3-6-46, situated at upparpally, Rajender Nagar, Telangana is illegal, arbitrary and besides violates the GHMC act and also violates Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondent No. 2 to 4 act on speaking order vide 31O/TPS/C-1 1/TUNR/GHMC|2024, dated 19-10-2024 and earlier Showcase Notice vide 310/TPS/C-11111.1NR/GHMC12024, dated 03- 10- 2024 and demolish the illegal construction carried out by Respondent No. 5 to 8 on the H.No. 2-4-12815, PNR Apartment, Opp Mantra N/all, Upperpally, Rajendra Nagar, Ranga Reddy, Telangana. |.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 2 to 4 act on speaking order vide 310/TPS/C- 11iR1NR/GHMCl2O24, dated 19-10-2024 and earlier Showcase Notice vide 310/TPS/C-1 1/RJNRlcHlilCl2024, dated 03-10-2024 and demolish the illegal construction carried out by Respondent No. 5 to 8 on the ll.No. 2-4-12815, PNR Apartment, Opp Mantra [Vlall, Upperpally, Rajendra Nagar, Ranga Reddy, Telangana. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI E.VENKATA SIDDHARTHA Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : G.P FoR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRAT|ON AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT !fi[il;", for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : sRr RAPARTHT VENKATESH, sc FOR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S to g : _ The Court made the fottowing ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE B. VIIAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITON No.39829 OF 2025 DATE OF ORDERz 29.12.2025 Between: PNR Apartments Residents Wel fare Association AND ...Petitioncr' The State of Telangana Rcpresented by its Principal Secretary Municipal Administration and Urban Development Dcpartment, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others ORDER: (ORAL) ..Respondcnl:. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to declare the actit,r, ot'respondents No.2 to 4 in not removing the illegal construction made in t!:c property bearing H.No.2-4-12815, PNR Apartments, opposite Mantra Mall. Upperpally, Rajendra Nagar, Ranga Reddy, despite speaking order datcri

19.10.2024 being passed, as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional

2. Heard Mr. Krishna Sankya Talluri, learned counsel, representilii-^ Mr. E,.Venkata Siddhartha, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Rapar"thi Venkatesh, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC, appearing for respontlcnts No.2 to 4; and perused the material on record.

3. Learned Standing Counsel for GHMC submitted that challenging t!.r: speak ing order dated 19 .10 .2024, Municipal Appeal No. 1 1 6 of 2024 was il h: r by the unofl'tcial respondents betbre the learned Chief Judge, City Snrali 2 \, - Causes Court, at Hyderabad, which was later dismissed by the order clated 18.07.2025 and immediate steps are being taken by the GHMC officials tc implement the said speaking order.

4. In the circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the lespondent authorities to implement the speaking order dated 19.10.2024 in ;tccordance with law within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of'a copy of this order :;. As the order is passed without entering into the merits of the case, irotice to respondents No.5 to 8 is dispensed with. However if, respondents Itri.:i to 8 are, in any way, aggrieved by this order, they are at liberty to irpproach this Court seeking for modification of this order. There shall be no oldel as to costs As a sequel thereto, rniscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this ',.r'rit pctition, stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/.P. PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To SA Telangana.

1. The Principal secretary, (N/AUD) State of Telangana at Hyderabad, 2. The C"ommissioner, GHMC, Hyderabad, Telangana' 5: Til ilputv commisiion"r,'GH1IC, CiryJg;l], Hyderabad, Telanga.na. 4. The Assistant iiiv'i;rl;;;;; citCr"-i 1, GHMC; Rljendra Nasar, llvderabad' Telangana. 5. TWO CC'S tO G.P FOR IVIUNICIPAL ADIVIINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOeMEN},'rf igi', Corrt fort" Stit" of Telanganq-a!.r-ly{erabad' (OUT) 6. on" cc to SRt-r.vi-r{KArn S|DDHARTHA, Advocale [Qfup] . 7. One CC to SRi nninnfHl VENKAi6S*, SC FOR GH-lvlC, Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CD CoPies HIGH COURT DATED i2911212025 &.-E-.. I \ * 't HES t 0 6 JAN ?026 .t:-. S:lr,- ORDER WP.No.39829 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. \L \ xb'