Perabattula Prasanna Kumar v. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 oI the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction or writ particularly in the nature of Mandamus duly declaring the action of the respondents in not providing the permanent or regular compassionate appointment instead of the outsourcing job intermittently since the date of the death of the Father of the petitioner, and in not considering the representation dated 08.12.2O11 and 21 .11.2025, as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently, direct the respondents to consider the above representations and provide permanent and regular appointment on compassionate grounds forthwith in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the citc lmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representation dzl :d 08.1 2.201 'l and 21 .11.2025, and provide permanent and regular appointmer t on compassionate grounds forthwith in the interest of .iustice. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI P.RAMA SHARANA SHARMA counsel forthe Respondents: SRI KIRAN REDDY MALLARAPU, iC FORTSHCL The Court made the following: ORDER I IN TH E HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RA'ESHWAR RAO NN 4 18 2 F P T R DATE:3O.t2.2O25 Between: Perabattula Prasanna Kumar AND The State ofTelangana, Reo. bv its PrinciPal SecretarY, o"buit'nl"nt Housing Secretariat Buildings' Hyderabad and two others' ... Petitioner ...ResPondents ORDER This Writ Petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the respondents in not providing permanent or regular compassionate appointment to the petitioner and instead engaging him on 'death of his outsourcing basis intermittently since the date of the father, and in not considering the representations dated 08'12'2011 and 21.11.2025, as illegal and arbitrary' i

2. Heard Sri P. Rama Sharana Sharma' learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Kiran Reddy Mallarapu' learned Standing Counsel for TSHCL, appearing on behalf of the respondents' Perused the material on record' t\ I t 2

3. (a) Brief facts of the case are as fol r ws: that the petitioner's father, late Perabathula Venkateswar Rtr r, was working as Non-Technical Work Inspector with the respondr nt Corporation and, due to cardiac arrest, he died on 27.09.20L1 wt le in service at the age of 57 years, leaving behind the petitioner l rd his mother. The deceased employee left no property, therebl, rendering the family helpless. As such, the petitioner's mother, p. ,lagendramma, submitted a representation dated 08.12.2011 to Il e Minister for Housing, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyder rbad, seeking compassionate appointment for her son, the petit ( ner, who was then working on outsourcing basis as a Work Insp: rtor under MK Enterprises since 09.12.2010. The petitioner il; educationally qualified with a Diploma in Mechanical Engineering, relongs to the SC caste, and submits that he is eligible for :om passion ate appointment. (b) Though several vacancies exist in tf 3 respondent Corporation and regular recruitment notifications were issued, compassionate appointments were allegedly being provided to candidates having political influence, whereas the letitioner has been deprived of regular posting due to lack of ; rch influence. Though, the petitioner was provided with compas:; )nate posting t / I 3 within a few months after his father's death' he has been working intermittently and the cause of action still survives'

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that several similarly placed candidates have formed a union and are collectively striving for compassionate appointment, and in pursuance thereof' a joint representation dated 2t'11'2025 was submitted to the 2nd respondent, but no response has been received'

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that appropriate orders may be passed in this Writ Petition by directing the respondents to consider the representations dated 08'12'2011 and 21.11.2025 submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a reasonable period ' Accordingly, prayed to allow the Writ Petition' S.LearnedStandingCounselforTSHCL,appearingonbehalfof the respondents submits that the respondents would consider the representations of the petitioner dated 0B'12'2011 and 2l'7t'2025 and Pass aPProPriate orders'

7. Taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties' without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Writ Petition is disposed of' directing the respondent authorities to consider the petitioner's --q,! a 4 representations dated 08.12.2011 and 21.11.2025 rt spectively and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as ,l (peditiously as possible. preferably within a period of eight (B) weel.: from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be r o order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pendin:, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPY// SD/- C. DEEPIKA ASSi STANT REGISTRAR (+ SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary, Department Housing Secretarirl , Telangana State , Hyderabad.

2. The Managing Director, Telangana State Housing Corplation, Urdu Galli, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad

3. The Project Director (Housing), Telangana State Housirrr Corporation Ltd, Ranga Reddy, Telangana.

4. One CC to SRI P.RAMA SHARANA SHARMA, Advocale [OPUC] 5. One CC to SRI KIRAN REDDY MALLARAPU, SC for Tli JCL. [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies. BSK PVL 4e HIGH COURT DATED:3011212025 \ l o I ;ne SIA ( It o 2 JrN 2021 o ORDER WP.No.40181 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \thl" \