Syed Abdul Faraz Rehan v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction or writ particularly in the nature of ltrlandamus duly declaring the action of the respondents in not providing the permanent or regular compassionate appointment instead of the outsourcing job intermittently since the date of the death of the husband of the petitioner, and in not considering the representation dated 07.11.2024 and 21 .11.2025, as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently, direct the respondents to consider the above representations and provide permanent and regular appointment on compassionate grounds forthwith in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the ci r umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cou 1 may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representation d,l ed 07.11.2024 and 21 .11 .2025, and provide permanent and regular appointm€ r t on compassionate grounds forthwith in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI p.RAMA SHARANA SHART!t, , Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Gp FOR HOUSING Counsel for the Respondents Nos.2 & 3: SRI KIRAN REDDy MALLARAPU, SC FOR TSHCL The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITIoN No.39871 OF 202s DATE: 29.12.2025 Between: Syed Abdul Faraz Rehan ... Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department Housing Secreta riat Buildings, Hyderabad and two others. .., Respondents ORDER This Writ Petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the respondents in not providing permanent or regular compassionate appointment to the petitioner and instead engaging him on outsourcing basis intermittently since the date of death of his father, and in not considering the representations dated 07.17.2024 and 21.77.2025, as illegal and arbitrary.

2. Heard Sri P. Rama Sharana Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Kiran Reddy Mallarapu, learned Standing Counsel for TSHCL, appearing on behalf of the respondents. Perused the material on record 2

3. (a) Brief facts of the case are as fc,l petitioner's father, late Syed Abdul Wahed, we : ows: that the working as a Technical Work Inspector with the respondent corprr ration a nd, due to health issues, he died on 17.02.2078 while in s= of 47 years, leaving behind the petitioner l The deceased employee left no property, theret,, -vice at the age td his family. rendering the family helpless. As such, the petitioner made a ^ 07 .1,1.2024 seeking compassionate appointrr { application on nt with the respondent corporation. The petitioner is educa :i rnally qualified with B.Tech (Mechanical) and was aged 26 years at the time of his father's death. The petitioner belongs to the Muslin :omm unity and submits that he is eligible for compassionate appoint nent. . (b) Though several vacancies exist in t te respondent corporation and regular recruitment notifications were issued, compassionate appointments were allegedly beir ; provided to candidates having poritical infruence, whereas the petitioner has been deprived of regular posting due to lack of ;uch influence. Though the petitioner was provided with compa:i: ionate posting within a few months after his father,s death, he h;r: been working intermittently and the cause of action still survives.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that several similarly placed candidates have formed a union anc rre collectively ) _) striving for compassionate appointment' and in pursuance thereor' a joint representation dated 2l'll'2025 was submitted to the 2nd respondent, but no response has been received'

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that appropriate orders may be passed in this Writ Petition by directing the respondents to consider the representations dated Ol'It'2024 and 21.11'2025 submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a reasonable period' Accordingly, prayed to allow the Writ Petition'

6.LearnedStandingCounselforTSHCL,appearingonbehalfof the respondents submits that the respondents would consider the representations of the petitioner dated 07'11'2024 and 2t'lt'2075 and.Pass a PProPriate orders ' 7. Taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel For the respective parties' without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case' this Writ Petition is disposed of' directing the respondent authorities to consider the petitioner's representations dated 07 '7L'2024 and 21'11'2025 respectively and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law' as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order' There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pendin y, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. SDi-' . SRINIVASA REDDY AS{ ISTANT REGISTRAR

1.r' SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To, '1 . The Principal Secretary, Department Housing Secretar i rt Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. The Managing Director, Telangana State Housing Corp rration, Urdu Galli, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad

3. The Project Director (Housing), Telangana State Hous r g Corporation Ltd., Ranga Reddy, Telangana.

4. One CC to SRI P. RAMA SHARANA SHARMA, Advoc: e [OPUC] 5. One CC to SRI KIRAN REDDY MALLARAPU, SC FOFI ISHCL [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOUSING, High Court for the Strl e of Telangana at Hyderabad . [OUT]

7. PMK PVL Two CD Copies ,W I l l I HIGH COURT DATED:2911212025 oF't s * s\ \ % U. { HO ,,..1 * ::-- ORDER WP.No.39871 ol 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \ \ ?T