✦ High Court of India · 09 Oct 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 09 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
09 Oct 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,145 words

' 4. SriVenugopala Swamy Temple, Ganugabantl Village, Thungathr{hy ManOii, [ta'tgonOa Dis[rict. R'ep.by lnsp=ector, Endowrnents, Nalgpnda.

5. Sri Daroori

6. Panjala Yadagiri, S/o.P.Ramulu,.aged about.+9 Y."qr., Occ Agric.ulture GiriungaOania Village, Thu ngath urthy Ma ndal, Na lgonda Dislrict.

7. Gundagani Ramesh, S/o.G.Bach.aiah, a.g.ed ?bgYl4f Ye.aq Occ.Agriculture CinundaOanda Vitlage, Thungathurthy Mandal, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENTS pet'rtion Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, more part'rcular'ly, a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondents Asst. Commissiooet; ndowments, in conduct the publicatio n on 09-06-2014, for the lease hold rights of the agricultural lands in Sy.No.105, 11A, 119, 12O, 122, 123 and 170 admeasuring Ac.l1.24 gts, situated at Ganugbanda village, Thungathurthy Mandal, Nalgonda district, belongs to Sth respondent Sri Venugopal Swamy temple, Kommala village, Aravapalli Mandal, Nalgonda district treating that the said lands belongs to the fourth respondent temple, and trying to dispossess, the petitioners/ tenantr; of the sth respondent temple he rein, in violation of provisions of the A.P.charitable and Hindu religious institution s and endowments act,19g7, and in violatio n of the Principles of natural Justice, and without following the procedure prescribed under the act, and the rules, as ille0al, arbitrary and unjust, consequently to set-aside the same. l.A.NO: 10F 2014 l P.NO :46339 oF2014) Petition Under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support ot ttre peiition, in" iigt court may be preased to grant a stay of all +urther proceedings pursuant the public auction conducted on 09-06-2014, by thr: third respondent herein, for the lease hord rights of the agricuttural tands in Sy.No.10S,118,11g, 12O, 122,123 and 1TO, aimeasuring Ac'11'24 guntas, situated at Ganugbanoa' vittage, Thungathurthy Mandar, Nalgonda district, belongs to Sth respondent Sri Venugopal Swamy temple, Kommala village, Aravapalli Mandal, NaigonOa District. t. NO:2 O 201 P o 2014 Petition Under Section 't 5't cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in supporr of the peiition, irr" Higr'- c'.;;;;;;"*"'. ," grant a stay of dispossession of the petitioner; herein who are the existing tenants by the respondent No'1-3 herein, fiom the agricurturar rands in Sy.No.'t05,118,119, 12O. 122,129 and 170, ,ar".rring Ac.11.24guntas, situated at Ganugbanda viflage, Thungathurthy Mandar, t'{atgonca district, berongs to Sth respondent Sri Venuaopal Swamy temple, Kommala village, Aravapalli Mandal,Nalgonda di$trict. - l.A.NO: 1oF 2015 P.NO 40 20 s) Between: ' Iffi.?:1':o:tJ""filyft:?rt{}.,;:l3::l;3ff"n,"nt(Revenue-r), secreteriare, ' Iffi fi?'llxl!'llil.?iaBll*ments Depa rtment' Dh a rmi ka bha va n, t l:[ffi::nt commissioner, Endowments Department, Nalsonda District at i I i ) I . ...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS AND

1. Mula SomiReddy, S/o.Late Mula Ram Reddy, aged about62 years, Occ ; Agriculture,. Ganungabanda Village, Thungathurthy Mandal, Nalgonda District.

2. Kancharla Kushalava Reddy, S/o.Late K.Raghava Reddy, aged about 52 ygqrs, Ocq ; Agriculture, Ganungabanda Village, Thung-athurthy Mandal, Nalgonda District. ....RESPON DENTS/PETITIONERS

3. Sfi V-erlugopala Swamy Ternple, Ganugabanda Vitlage, Thungathurthy Mandal, Nalgonda District. Rep.by lnspector, Endowments, Nalgonda. 4. Sri Venugopala Swamy Temple, Kommala village,Aravapally Mandal, Nalgonda District. Rep.by its Hereditary Poojari, Sri Daroori Jagannadha Charyulu,or Venkatacharyulu,

5. Panjala Yadagiri, S/o.P.Ramulu, aged about 40 Y.ears, Occ Agriculture GanungabandaVillage,ThungathurthyMandal,NalgondaDistrict 6. Gundagani Rarnesh, S/o.G.Bachaiah, aged about 41 Years, Occ Agriculture Ganungabanda Village, Thungathurthy Manda!, Nalgonda District. (Respondents Nos.3 to 6 are not necessary parties in this petition) .... RESPON DE NTS/RESPONDENTS Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the Status order passed in W.P.M.P. No.46339 of 2014 in W.P.No.37027 of 5-12-2014 and dismiss the writ petition. !.A.NO:2 OF 2915(WPMP. NO: 3803 OF 2015) Between

1. Mula Somi'Reddy, S/o.Late Mula Ram Reddy, aged about 62 years, Occ ; Agriculture, Ganungabanda Village, Thungathurthy Mandal, Nalgonda District.

2. Kancharla Kushalava Reddy, S/o.Late K.Raghava years, Occ ; Agr'rculture, Ganungabanda Village, Nalgonda District. Reddy, aged about 52 Thungathurthy Mandal, .....PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, Endowments Department(Revenue-ll), Secreteriate, Hyderabad. Rep:by its Principal Secretary.

2. The Cornmissioner, Endowments Departrnent, Dharmikabhavan, Buggulkunta, Hyderabad.

3. The Assistant Commissioner, Endowments DepartrRent, Nalgonda District at Nalgonda.

4. Sri Venr"rgopala Swamy'Temple, Ganugabanda Mllage, Thungathurthy Mandal, Nalgonda District. Rep.by lnspector, Endowments, Nalgonda. 5. Sri Venr.rgopala Swamy Temple, Kommala village,Aravapally Mandal, Nalgonda District.Rep.by its Hereditary Poojari, Sri Daroori Jagannadha Charyulu,or Venkatacharyulu,

6. Panjala Yadagiri, S/o.P.Ramulu, aged about 40 Years, Occ Agriculture Ganung;rbanda Village, Thungathurthy Mandal, Nalgonda District. 7. Gundag:rni Ramesh, S/o.G.Bachaiah, aged about 41 Years, Occ Agricultr-rre Ganungabanda Village, Thungathurthy Mandal, Nalgonda District. ....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners herein to amend the name of the 7th respondnet as G.Paramesh, in place of G.Ramesh in the cause title of the writ petition No.37027 l2O1 4, and in the WPMP.No.46339l2O14. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRt PRAVEEN CHILLARA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5 : SRI C}I.SATISH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7: SRI MULA AMARENDER REDDY The Court made the following ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JI'STICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.37O27 of 2Ol4 ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and no further orders are required to be passed in this matter, thereby, the Writ Petition has become infructuous.

2. Recording the aforementioned submission, the .t Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

3. As sequel to it, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. /TRUE COPY// SD/. AH MED ABDULLAH KHAN ASSISTANT OFFICER To

1. Two ccs to GP FOR ENDOWMENTS, H(7h court for the State of Telangana CHILLARA, Advocate 2. One CC to 3. One CC to SRI MUIS AMARENDER REDDY' Advocate 4. One CC to SRI CH.SATISH KUMAR, Advocate loPUCl 5. Two CD CoPies Bt* 'rc HIGH COIJRT DATED:09/1 012025 7 I i l.t- $ rt"B ) I, ft. -" /- .) i, ::...:. 1 .' t. I i\ -.-. +: ORDER WP.No.37027 of 2014 DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS. &ftat ob zl>lu

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments