The High Court · 2025

the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to consider the petitioners applicati: r seeking grant of extension of time as accorded vide order Dt.0210912016 for c :-casting of sand in the lands of the petitioners by directing the 3rd Responder t to issue necessary / permissions to the 4th Respondent in view of the Representations dated 1711112025 and 0111212O26 during the pendency of the writ petition. Gounsel for the Petitioners: SRI P. SUBASH Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: AGP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI MUMMANENI SRINIVASA RAO, S.C. FOR TSMDC The Court made the following: ORDER a 7/ A IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELAN(] A.NA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRIIUSTICE N.V.SHRAVA] I KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.39616 of 2025 DATE OF ORDER: 23.12.2025 Between: Sri. Bolle Suryam ancl eight others. AND ... I etitioners The State of Telangana, Mines and Geology Department ancl 1 rree others ...R,: pondents ORDER: Heard lcarned counsel for the petitioners and le rrned Assistant Government Pleader fol Mines appealitlg for responderrl Nos.1 to 3 and Sri.lnlummani Srinivas Rao, learncC standing counsel for T! MDC appearing for respondent No.4. Wittr their consent, the writ petition is lrr ing taken up for disposal

2. This wlit petition has been filed seeking the following ,rayer:- a " to declare the inactiorr of the 2,,,1 respondent in gr extension of time to the eurlier order of the 2ua respot 02.09.2016 to de-cnst the sand on the petitioners Lt N o 8 8/1 E, 8 82 E, 5 4/1 5 A, 5 7/3, 5 4fi 7, s 4/18, 41/8, s 6/3 55/2, 88/6, BB/3, B3/s, 84/1, 56/8,28/5, 56/4,56/5, 56/'( 56fl, situate at Dhnrmaanram \lilLtrge, Wazeedu Manar District, as uas granted eorlie.r on Dt 02.09.2016 as illegal, contrary to lau, unjust, colourable exercise contrury to Telangnna State Sand Mining Rules, Z) aiolation of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the constituti and consequentlry direct the 2*t respondent to issue exter,: to the permission dnted 02.09.2076 for de-casting of snn petitioners lands in Sy No.88/1E, 88/2E, 54fi5A, : , 'nting the lent dated ds in Sy ;6/7,67/5, 45/4 and ', Mulugu arbitrary, of poruer, 5 and in m of lndin on of time l frorn the /3, 54/17, 2 54/18, 47/8, 56/3, s6/7, 67/5, 5s2, 88/6, 8B/3, \s/s, 84/1, s6/8, 28fr, 56/4, 56fr, 56/6, 45/4 and 56fl, situate at Dharmaoaram Village, Wazeedu Mandnl, Mulugu District by consifuing the representations dated 77.17.2025 and 01.12.2025."

3. Brief facts stated in this writ petition are that petitioners claims to be owners of various extent of lands in Sy.No.88/1E, 88/ 2F,, S4/75A, 57 /3, s4 / 17, 54 / 78, 41 / 8, s6 / 3, 56 / 7, 67 / 5, 55 / 2, 88 / 6, 88 / 3, 83 / s, 84 / 7, 56 / 8, 28 / s, 56/4,56/5,56/6, 45/4 and56/7, situate at Dharmavaram Village, Wazeedu Mandal, Mulugu District. It is submitted that respondent No.2 ttide proceeding bearing Rc.No.61/Sand / KTDM / 2016 clated 02.09.201 6, granted permission to respondent No.4 to de-cast sand from the petitioners' subject land and subsequently, petitioners entered into agreements dated 26.70.2076 with respondent No.4 for de-casting of sand frorn subject land and the same was valid for a period of six (06) months. Thereafter, petitioners on77.77.2025 and 07.72.2025 made represeniations and requested the respondent No.2 to extend the permission for de-casting of land from the subject land, however, the same are str'll pending for consideraLion. Aggrieved by the same, this writ petition is filed. '( )

4. Though v4rious grounds are raised in the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioners restricts his prayer seeking a direction to respondent No.2 to dispose petitioners' representations dated 17.11,.2025 and 07.12.2025, in a time bound period. J

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mirrt:r appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and learned standing counsel for TSIV I tC aPPearing for respondent No.4 submits that if the petitioners, reprt:l :ntations dated "17.11.2025 and 0,1,.72.2025 are pending, the respondent No.12 may be directed to pass aPproPriate orders

6. Recording the submission made by learned cour-rs :1 appearing on either side and without expressing any opinion on the mer:t r of the case, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No 2 to cor rider petitioners' representations dated 17 .77.2025 and 07.72.2025 and e ter giving fair opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, shall pass appropr i Lte orders strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, pre :crably within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of copl' rf this order and communicate the same to the petitioners

7. Accordingly this writ Petition disposed o Miscellaneous IS applications, if anv pending, shall stand closed. No order ar; o costs //TRUE COPY// SD{- r\ SRINIVASA REDDY ' -$s':i:'j:"i'r** -/ \ r\ , sEciloN oFFrcER The Chairman-cum-District Collector, District Levql SLrrr Committee, Mulugu District, Telangana. One CC to SRI P. SUBASH, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Mines & Geology, High Court for the itate of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] \ One CC to SRI MUMMANENI SRINIVASA RAO, S.C. fc,r TSMDC [OPUC] Two CD Copies To MP 1 2 3 4 5 HIGH COURT DATt 'D:2311212025 .a 1HE SIA o() 0 _q iA 2[ F i?ss *. r.i) z R WP.No, 19616 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE V1I I.IT PETITION I WIT'I{OUT COSTS Ir\A, 1