V. pravallika, D/o v. Venkateshwarlu, Aged about
Case Details
Acts & Sections
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court rnay be pleased to suspend the prospectus issued by the respondent.No.2iated 30.09.2025 in so far as defming eligibility criteria as Local Candidate under Explanation (b) of Rule VIll (ii) of the Telangana Medical Colleges (Admission into Postgraduate Medical Courses) Rules, 2021, as amended by G.O. Ms. No.148,'tlealth, Medical and Family Welfare (C1) Department, dated 28.10.20:24, issued by Respondent No. 1, pending disposal of this Writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF Z)25 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the direct the Respondents to treat petitioners as Local Candidate for admission into Court -. Post Graduate Medical Degree and Diploma courses.under,competent quota in - - .*';r+jj*Il##i,liiF;ruiri"d+;; )2}25:26-una Sciences, Telangana State, pending disposal of this Writ petition. f -Health -**#r* Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI ALLURI DIVAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.l : SRI T.RAMESH, ._ -- . -Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI T.SHARATH,;**;.;.*,*,... GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW - . _t._._it::r.!:sj-if*.u+rlG:1-='jji=-j-a1i- ' SC FOR KNRUHS - --.-----:-- - --- _ -r:;a W.P.No.39687 OF 2025 Between: Jitsy S Bhavan Kerala - AND Kumar, Occ. Doctor, Bethel Thiruvananthapuram, ..PETITIONER 1' The State of rerangal?: R9R by.ilp principar secretary Medicar Heatth and l.rritv welfare pe[arrnient'oi'e.ii.'ndib5di"-r-i;i;sana srate Secretariat Hyderabad -5OO022. 2- The Katoji Narayana Rao universityof Heblth sciences, Rep. by its Registrar ---'-" Warangal, Telangana State-506002. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constiiliffi of tndiJ praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the prospectus issued by the Respondent No.2 dated 30'09'2025 in so far as defining etigibility criteria as Local candidate under Explanation (b) of Rule vlll (ii) of the Tetangana Medical coileges (Admission n to -Po st g ra d u a te Med i ca I -Co u rses)*R ulesn202-1-*s-a men d ed -by -G.O No.148, Heatth, Medicat and Famity WgJf_+r*gJ) p_epartment, dated 28.10.2024, issued by Respondent No. 1 on the 'that'it'vio lates the judgment of the Honble Supreme Co urt of lndia tn versus Shrey Gael and Ors (2025 SCC online SC 180), where the 3 Judge Bench categoricaily held that residence-based reservations other than institutional preference in professionat postgraduate courses are impermissible and also viotative of Judgement of the Division Bench of this Hon'bre court dated 1r.12.2024 in w.p. No. 30771 of 2,o24andBatch,conSequenttyoirii6ItffiatpetitionerSaSLocal Candidate for admission into Post Graduate',,'Medical Degree and Diploma courses under competent quota in pursuani to Nggr (pG) 2025-26 under the aegis of KNR University of Health scienoes, Telangana state. r. Li 1 I I i I I I I i I ! IA NO: 2 OF 2025 petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to treat petitioners as Local Candidate for admission into post Graduate Medical Degree and Diploma courses under competent quota in pursuant to NEET (PG) 2025-26 under the aegis of KNR University of Health Sciences, Telangana State, pending disposal of this Writ petition. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to -su3pend the prospectus issued by the respondent No.2 dated 30.09.2025 in so far as defining eligibility criteria as Local Candidate under Explqnation (b) of Rule Vlll (ii) of the Telangana Medical Colleges (Admission into Postgraduate Medical Courses) Rules, 2021, as amended by G.O. Ms. No.148, Health, Medical and Famity Welfare (Cl ) Department, dated 28.10.2024, issued by Respondent No. 1, pending disposal of this Writ petition. Counsel for the ResPondent No.2 : SRI T.SHARATFT, SC FOR KNRUHS The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER ".*'.ti8rd1i&(ib!.E . r,:j{.;++..,j*:!" ,.,,, . i -, , IN THE HIGH COURT FOR TI{E STATE OF TELANGANA AT ITYDERABAI) THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KT'MAR SINGH ANtD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M.MOHIUDDIN WRIT PETITTON and 39687 of2025 Datedt}4;12.2025 W.P.No.39438 of 2025 Between: V.Pravallika The State of -felan-eana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Medical. Hcalth and Family Welfare Department, Dr. B. R. Arnbcdkar'f el angana State Secretariat, Hyderabad - 500 022, and another. W.P.No.39687 of 2025 Between: Jitsy S Jayan .Petitioner ..Respondents .Petitioner "g The State of '[elangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Medical. I{ealth and Farnily Welfare Department, I : i I i: I 2 Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Te langana State S ecre tariat, Hyderabad - 500 022, and another. COMMON ORDER: .Respondents Learned counsel Sri Alluri Divakar Reddy appears for the petitioners. Sri Tandra Ramesh, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department, appears fol respondent No.l. Sri T.Sharath, learned Standing Counsel Lor Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences (hereinafter referred to as, t'the University"), appears for respondent No.2.
2. The petitioners, who despite having studied MBBS in the medical instifutions in the State of Telangana as non-local candidates were treated as ineligible and non-locals br, intirnation dated 12.11.2025 for admission into Medical PG Degree/Diploma courses for the academic year 2025-2026, have approached this Court in the present writ petitions filed on 1,8.12.2025 and 20.12.2025 rcspcctively. The petitioners seek to avail of the interim order passed in thc cases of other persons on
08.10.2025 as clarified by order dared 18. I 1.2025 1
3. An objection has been taken by the learned standing counsel for the university that the petitioners have come very late for an interim relief when the first phase of counselring leading to the first batch of admissions is over. The petitioners were aware of their non-local category as per the conditions of the admission prospectus issued on
30.0g.2025. If such interim relief is granted, the entire operation of the seat matrix gets effected at an advance stage of admission process. Therefore, such interim reliel'may be rejected.
4. Learned Standing counsel for the University has referred to an order passed by a learned Coordinate Bench of this court in Durgam Anish v. The state of retangana (w.p.No.25904 of 2023, dated
15.09.2023), whercin in sinrilar circumstances, the learned Coordinate Bench refused to grant the rclief for being treated as a non-local candidate as the petitioner *,as guilty of inaction and had slept over his rights. The Court had also <lbservcd that the facts relate to admission to an educational instirution. r.r'hich is a time-bound process under the directions of the I{on'ble Suprerne court. [t was also observed that the , , I \ unexplained delay ol'45 da,r,s rvas fatal to the case of the petitioner. It was further observed that in casc the rvrit petition was entertained, the r:' 4 process of admission to MBBSiBDS course would never be concluded. Therefore, the relief was declined.
5. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties and after taking note of the relevant materials as above, we are inclined to follow the same view as has been held by the learned Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Durgam Anish (supra). The petitioners are aware of their status after issuance of the prospectus on 30.09.2025. Those who were vigilant came to the Court in the first week of October, 2025, and the interim relief was granted in their favour on 08.10.2025 with a direction to the University to entertain their applications. It was on account of subsequent confusion in the minds o[ the Univcrsity, that the said interim order was clarified on l8.l 1.2025.
6. The present petitioners, if were affectcd. could have come much ahead in time. The writ petitions have bcen prefbrred only on
18.12.2025 and 20.12.2025 respectivell, after taking a cue from the orders passed in the case of others, rvhen the adrnission process and timeliness is sacrosanct as has also been observ'ed in Durgam Anish (supra) by the learned Coordinate Bench of this Court. 'fherefore, are not inclined to entertain the prayer in the u,rit pctitions. i I I I ! I i j I I I I I I I I I I I t I t" \i 1 : ,* r' 5
7. The writ petitions are accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/.T. //TRUE COPY/ OFFICER To,
1. One CC to SRI ALLURI DIVAKAR R'EDDY' 2. Tuo ccs to Gp FOR UeOtcRL HEALTH FW, High court for the state -' fe6ngana. [OUTI -' Sciences, Warangal. [OPUC] 3.oneCCtoSRlT.SHAB4u.SCforKalojiNarayanaRaoUniversityof 4. Two CD CoPies- of' H.ealth r r n.--r,E n, in'.4idllii.tif ._ -':" ' .'tirtl+i+iiqri:+;I:il" i, ' .,|..,....-:,4:, . . .'.1:.,.4--"*J.+..'-6r-h'',r . ,:j .: . r.,,ia+,-"ili,hv,j-s.,. . -. ,' i : : i i I i I i i I I I I I I I ! I I I t i L I .a : t I a , i j i l I I I I I I I ! 4 f I OI FFB m6 o * HIGH COURT DATED i24112|2025 COMMON ORDER WP.No.39438AND€9687of 2025 -- -- - *r,++l*ii***+;fqr+E.iBidr.rr -.. . .: ....,1 3-ijffi;sIa;iFtiaPd;:.J:i::;. . -. .... - -. **+;ra1ilriflif11;*l*.**riow* 1r,r...- DISMISSING THE WITHOUT COSTS WRIT PETITIONS .!*.*!il.lirtl.arf.4il!E ir'!.,++f#bE-- - .- . . = -5r*i:a1 i.?-.,:r+,.!+t--*-: ..:+.,,.. -. -- - **Y:TIrtI:. r tr:"_y,3::::: .,a+**l^i;!i;rr*a+;",:*;.,,.,#*.jF, .... * PYJ\ (v