The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 ol the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the oral request of fetitioner to enter his name in the Bhu Bharathi Records thereby to issue ,.New Pattadar Pass Book in his favour pertaining to Agricultural Land a measu ng .00 Gts in Sy. No. 1 26/5/Ai6itu?tdd ?-t-Th6egap-r.rr Viilage, Kothu r Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as illegat, arbitrary and against the provisions of law apart from prin-files of naturat lri.siice-Eni con6Efr6iiffiirect thERespondents to enter the name of Petitioner in the Bhu Bharathi Records thereby to issue new Pattadar Passbook in his favour in respect of above said property. . '. :_-:r.' "aji':-.; ls, .:.,:a!:ij:. - . ..' ... ;iLi{*.5:4r}jiE!rl:!ni:r:ii-i- r1. ' :. : '' ,-': -:i ii: ' ! :::l IA NO: 1 OF Petition under Section 151 CPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the Respondents to consider the request of the petitioner to enter his name in the Bhu Bharathi Records thereby to issue New pattadar pass Book in his favour pertaintng to Agricultural Land admeasuring Ac.3.00 Gts in sy.No,126tstA, situated at rheeg"prrtvillage, Kothur Mandat, Ranga District. Reddy counsel for the Petitioner:sRl. MOHAMMED zuBAlR AKRAM counsel for the Respondents: sRl L. R^AVINDER AGp FoR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER .-6i**,-,|.i*"-. .-..glet ..-;rrrF'++---.!- -':.-#r*,fl*=:r*:r:- ' .,,.,--*.Jpa lydlllflt. s. :ii-: . i. rl.:a - t -. ,\-+,.r -dlraarel..fXfi ..F*,-.,.€ir!! . 'F.ni.;^& ,',r"..'. a-gL::. l .-,--e".i*- , 1_-'i .<."c,rla**{h --tfffi...lffirt(ar, " , a-. --!t1&-*1.,:sy_ -j.i'.-',t-i*'- i- l'-., ..,,._ . . .: . ij+i4I#*iffii j i.r4 - -. .. 1t -" i) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.39489 of 2O2S Date: 23.12.20125 Between: Mangali China Anjaiah .Petitioner And The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and three others ORDER: Respondents This Writ Petition is filed praying this Court to declare the aCtion of the respondents in not considering the oral request of the petitioner to enter his name in the Bhu Bharati records and consequential issuance of new pattadar passbook in his favour in ' respect of the agricultural land admeasuring Acs.3.00 guntas in Sy.No. 126151A, situated at Theegapur Village, Kothur Mandal. Ranga Reddy District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the . principles of natural justice and consequently, prayed for other appropriate reliefs.

2. Heard Mr.Mohammad Zubair Akram, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents and with their I 2 EVV, J wp-?Qt9--202s consent, this Writ Petition is being disposed of at the admission

3. Learned counsel for ti:e petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Acs.3.OO guntas in Sy.No.126l5lA, situated at Theegapur Village, Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that, his name was incorporated in the revenue records and pattadar passbook bearing No.546967 uide Patta No.13 was also issued in his favour under the provisions of the 'relangana Rights in Land and Pattadar passbooks Act, 1971. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that, during land updation programme, the petitioner's name is not , reflecting in Bhu Bharati Portal and therefore, he made severa-l oral requests seeking for incorporation of his name in Bhu Bharati Portal and for issuance of e-pattadar passbook. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent authorities did not consider his request. Hence, this Writ Petition. a

4. sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents, would submit that the petitioner has not made online application in appropriate module r makes fresh onlines_ of Bhu Bharati Portal and if the 3 EVV. J wp_3${ge_2025 application duly enclosing all the necessary documents, the respondent authorities would consider the same.

5. ilav.ng heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court, without going into the merits and demerits of the case, deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition permitting the petitioner to make fresh online application in appropriate module of Bhu Bharati Portal and on such application being made by the petitioner, if it fulfils all the requirements under the provisions of the Telangana Bhu Bharati (Records of Rights in Land) Act, 2025, the respondent authorities are directed to consider the same after issuing notice to all the concerned and affording an opportunity of personal hearing to them and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible.

6. Accordirrgly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

7. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed \ To SD/-P. PONNA KRISHNA ANT REGISTRAR //TRUE GOPY// SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal secretary, Revenue Department, state of Telangana, Secretariat, HYderabad. 2 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District' Kongarakalan' lbrahimpatnam' Ranga ReddY District-

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer,, Shadnagar Division, Ranga Reddy District. 4. The Tahsildar, Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. dESPONDENTS 5. One CC to SR!. MOHAMMED ZUBATR AKRAI\41 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for Advb-cate TOPUCI of Telanga .r:li::.* . . na at HYderabad. [OUT] lr'' 'i.:.i.p ,. . I

7. Two CD Copies DAN VY -State ,i-$ftti,,. 'ri: :i': " r' ti'*-' ' ..j,{. : ' '. ,i.. : f.tlBirtlrFttF.?.r ' t r'tt!!*itrr:t f, r,i!!t+lir*tn {, r. -r. -.,i. -.*. ''1 . ., 6 9ll: r. i.. ,. *ril*lriq-'*-*r-++'.a -.:tP.)iL .t.<ilr-.!i;.. -.,.,'..i, .- _,..-.: ,.:.:-. - -'!r.:FifiFid;.?ii],Er^ -,. t#{rarr-. , .'li*dh. {i i ri"4,,''-,. , .:.". .re3:6::.:-r6!?i a i I ,) :'j[ ,-...--i.=..,Gr€q.s..- - HIGH COURT I \ D ATED:2311212025 ORDER WP.No.39489 of 2025 i1 t t+:i . .;r :r...).$ . .-- -!.a*, -.. i'+lr:r_ THE S sR r, Jlr C) 0 g JAr{ 20?$ I I 1-:rt :. . '.. - :y.1-iu,i! - r-, \ I I .-.' . r' .:ia rir+s*&? '-*8*i* .s;. a,-. rc*-, . rltaaE^'ra'- -t.-.1+r{aa4r+{t*aF.r!r5** L: :"rl&&Gf tiFItF*rS"#!. t.&...,, " : f .y :::. : - . a,.{i :j { .'.iL r,! ra&. ---. ittl-.-,.: 1 : ... x!.*. DISPOSING WITHOUT C ---+.r-,-.tl!i;.r{+!r--- :' -'..7! ;1$:.f#J, .":',1".: .'.. f ,'. :' r.r---.-- '. . r &.-^-. -- - P :'i. . ffi::g.;.'..'' r 1o ,fA k- ',;lq1,1,"*,f . ,,:'?if;ffiFl ..::r,_:.$;ai i ,.,.;.3;rq., ilffiitlF;qrJfirit Iiir+,j:-:'a..,--9.... 'l---9*,..{.+rr*. -.* ' F{**fil;y #-.{adia6E ti.., '.,:]