Reddy Srinivas Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 to 5 in treating Petitioner's land to an extent of Ac. 5-37gts in Sy No. 190/4 of Yacharam Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as assigned land is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of violation of Principles of Natural Justice and also in violation of Article 14,'|.9,21 and 300-4 of constitution of lndia, consequently direct the Respondents No.3 to 5 to remove the above land from the list of assigned lands and restore the same as Petitioner's private land in all revenue records basing on the letter vide Lr.No.B/1 56512021 , Daled 17/0912021 of the Respondent No.4. I l lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cit in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court direct the Respondent No. 3 to 5, to issue new e-pattadar pz,t to the Petitioner's land to an extent of Ac. 5-37gts in Sy No. Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District by removing the siz assigned land basing on the letter vide Lr.No.B/1 56512021 , t) the Respondent No.4, pending disposal of the writ petition. ;umstances stated nay be pleased to s book with regard 90/A of Yacharam me from the list of fted 17-09-2021 of Gounsel for the Petitioner: SRI DINESH REDDY, REP. FOR SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondents: SMT SNEHITHA, AGP FOR RE /ENUE The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE TIIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT IIYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PET TION No.3 9374 of 2025 T DATE:23.12.2025 Between: Reddy Srinivas Reddy. AND The State ofTelangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building Secretariat, Hyderabad and four others. ...Petitioner ORDER . . . Respondents This Writ Petition is hled seeking the following reliet_ "...to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nahrre of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondent Nos.3 to 5 in keating Petitioners land to an extent of Ac.5.37gts in Sy.No.190/A of Yacharam Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as assigned land is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and also in violation of Article 14, 19, 21 and, 300.4 of constitution of India, consequently direct the Respondents Nos.3 to 5 to remove the above land fiom the list of assigned lands and restore the same as Petitioners private land in all revenue records a "-.r€.a! 2 basing on the letter vide Lr'No'B/l5 6512O21' I ated 77l)gl2o2l of the Respondent No 4 '-"

2. Heard Mr. Dinesh Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Snehitha, ieamed Assistant Govemment Plead: for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos' l to 5 Perused the recorrl

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit hat the case of the petitioner has been examined by respondent No'5 r Ld a letter vide No.8154212021, dated 29'07'ZO2l has been addressed No.4 stating that an extent of Acs' 1'50 cents in Survet' kept as retainable land and remaining land to an ext(rr guntas is non-surplus land and recommended it for' to respondent rlo.190 will be t of Acs.l0.07 de-notification after ascertaining the details with original ceiling file

4. While it is so, he would submit that in response 1 r the said letter dated 29.01 .2021, respondent No'4 has addresserl a letter vide No.Bi 1565/2027, dated 17 '09'2021 and recommendc'l the case of the a petitioner to respondent No'3 to delete the land t , an extent of Acs.10.07 cents which is non-surplus land from the 1 rohibitory area out of total extent of Ac.11'27 guntas of Survey No' I ( 0 ofYacharam Village of Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' I I J

5. He further submit that the case of the petitioner is clear and it has been examined thoroughly and has been recommended for deletion from the prohibitory area, but no action has been taken by the respondent No.3 and hence, aggrieved thereby the present writ petition is filed and therefore, seek to pass appropriate orders.

6. Leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader on the other hand would submit that basing on the submissions made by the leamed counsel for the petitioner, it can be understood that the case of the petitioner is pending on the file of respondent No.3 which would be duly considered in the course of time. Hence, would seek to pass I appropriate orders. l. This Court having regard to the submissions of both the leamed counsel and upon considering the material available on record, this Court is of the.opinion that case of the petitioner has already been considered by respondent Nos.4 and 5, vide its Lr.Nos.B/l 56512021 a and 81542/2021, dated 17.09.2021, 29.07.2021 respectively and has been recom-niended to respondent No.3 and it has been quite a long time where more than four years have been lapsed but so far as no action has been taken on the recommendation made by respondent No.4. 4

8. In those circumstances, this Court deems it appr rpriate to direct respondent No.3 to examine the case of the pet t oner and pass appropriate orders, 1n accordance with law, AS : rpeditiously as possible, preferably within a period ofninety (90) dr.' s from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order.

9. With the above direction, this Writ Petition s disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall sta rd closed //TRUE COPY// To, 1 The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, S of Telangana. A h. porvrua KRTsHNA V"r RE9!,s.rRATt ,dic-flroriorrrcen \ ecrptirt at, Hyderabad, State

2. The chief commissioner Land Administration, Telangarr r state at Hyderabad.. 3. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, lbrahimpatnam Div sion, Ranga Reddy District.

5. The Tahsildar, Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distric:. 6. One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate tOpUCI 7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the S tate of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

8. Two CD Copies BSR BS HIGH COURT DATED: 2311212025 ORDER WP.No.39374 ot 2025 i it r: c E Jql\l 20,16 ( Jr .c) .i' a DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS \ t l&b