Smt, Vanam Aruna v. The State of Telangana

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in not passing appropriate orders on the final notice dated 15-07-2024 issued to the Unofficial Respondent Nos. 5 to 8 with regard to the excess land recorded in their favor to an extent of Ac. 1-30 3/4 guntas in Sy.No. 267411 situated at Yellanki Village, Ramannapeta Mandal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District and consequently direct Respondent No. 4 incorporate the name of the Petitioner in the revenue records in respect of the land to an extent of Ac. 2-20 guntas in 267 Al l situated at Yellanki Village, Ramannapeta Mandal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District. lA NO: 1 OFt 2025 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th Respondent to pass appropriate orders on the Final Notice dated 15-07- 2024 issued to the unofficial Respondent Nos. 5 to B, pending disposal of Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. RAVI MOHAN, SENIOR COUNSEL REPRESENTING SRI G. NARESH KUMAR Counsel forthe Respondents No.1 to 4: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.5 to 8: -- The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.39289 of 2025 Date:22.t2.2O25 Betr,r,,een: Smt. Vanam Aruna And . Petitioner The State of Telangala, Rep. by its Principa-l Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and seven others ORDER: ..Respondents This Writ Petition is filed praying this Court to declare the action of rcspondent No.4 in not passing appropriate orders on the final notice, dated \5.O7.2024 issued to the unofficial respondents with regard to the excess land recorded in their lavour i.e., lald to an extent of Ac. 1.3O % guntas in S_l'.No.267A/1, situated at Yellanki Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Yadadri-Bhuvanagiri District, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently, direct respondent No.4 to incorporate the name of the petitioner in the revenue records in respect ol the land to an extent of 7 E\,l/, J \\rp -.j9289 2025 Acs.2.2O guntas in Sy.No.267A/1, situated at Yellanki Village, Ramannapeta Mandal, Yadadri-Bhuvanagiri Disr :ict and for other appropriate reliefs.

2. Heard Sri G.Ravi Mohan, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri G.Naresh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the oflicial respondents and with their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage.

3. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the ou,ner and possessor of the land admeasuring Acs.2.2O guntas in Sy.No.267A/1, situated at Yellanki Village, Ramannapeta Mandal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District, along r,vith other lands, having purchased the same through registered sale deed bearing document No.161 of 2011. Learned Senior Counsel would further submit that the name of the petitioner was incorporated in a1l the revenue records and he was issued pattadar passbook bearing No.987767 with patta No.37. l,earned Senior Counsel for the petitioner 3 EVV, J wp 39289 2025 would further submit that, whiie issuing new pattadar passbook bearing No.T30 130 180027, the admeasuring Acs.2.2O guntas in Sv.I'Io.2674/1 was found missing. Therefore, the petitioner made a representation, dated 30.O1.2024, requesting to make necessary corrections in the revenue records and acting on the said representation, respondent No.2, uide letter, dated

20.03.2024, directed respondent No.4 to submit a report by conducting a detailed enquiry into the matter. In compliance r,r,ith the letter, dated 20.O3.2023, respbndent No.4 has issued a shor,v-cause notice, dated 30.03.2024 to the unofficial respondents, calling them to submit their explanation lr,ithin a period of seven days but, no explanation was submitted by the unofficial respondents within the said time, Thereafter, respondent No.4 also issued fina-I notice, dated 15.07.2024, directing the unofficial respondents to submit their explanation within seven days from the date of receipt of the said notice ald failure to do so lvould be treated as no explanation to submit and basing upon the records available further steps I EVV, J wp 19239 202s u'ould be initiated. The grievance of the petitioner is that, though the unolflcial respondents did not submit their ex:rlr..ration to the notice, dated 15.07.2024, no rrJers have vet been passed by respondent No.4. Learned Senior Counsel further submits that, despite the petitioner IS making consistent efforts before respondent No.4, action is being taken b1. respondent No.4 Therefore, the petitioner has no other option except to file the present lvrit petition.

4. Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the official respondents, rrould submit that the case of the petitioner is under consideration and accordingiy, necessary notices r.vere been issued to all the parties concerned and appropriate orders wor.rld be passed in due course of time. Stating so, learned Assistant Government Pleader prays to pass appropriate orders.

5. Having heard the submissions made b-y the iearned counsel for the respective parties, this Court, without going EVV. J wp 39289_202s into the merits and demerits of the case, deems it appropriate to dispose of this rvrit petition directing respondent No.4 to act upon the notice dated 30.O3-2024 and final notice, dated 15.07.2025 b-v issuing notice to all the persons interested including the unofficial respondents and after giving sufficient opportunity of personal hearing to them, pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. Since notices are stated to be ordered to the unofficial respondents, issuance of further notice to them in this ',vrit petition shal1 stand dispensed with.

6. With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall starrd closed. SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL EPUTY REGISTRAR I \ To ,TRUE COPY' SECTION OFFICER

1. The Tahsildar, Ramannapeta Mandal, Ramanna ta, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District.

2. One CC to SRI NARESH KUMAR GORIGE, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

4. Two CD Copies MP TKS )'f/ HIGH COURT DATED:2211212025 IttE s;. Y a) '..,.+ :.1 * t.- i I rF8 * ORDER WP.No.39289 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS a { Uc a\ ,(\ t