Sri. Sreenivas Eleswarapu v. 1. The State of Telangana

6. Sri. Sri Ram Narayan Kadiyala, S/o. K. Raghavendra Rao, Aged 43 years, Occ. Business, Rl/ o. Plot No.782, Road No.44, Jubliee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 033.

7. Smt. Chitturi Subba Lakshmi, W/o. Late C. Balarama Murthy, Rl/o. D.No.6-20- 13, Sneha Abode, East Point Colony, China Waltair, Visakhapatnam District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, order or direction more partictl Writ of Mandamus by declaring the inaction of official f upon the Representation and complaint lodgec No.'1 1'1225561 2265 dated 11.12.2025' by the Petittc without jurisdiction and violative of Principles of nature I direct the respondent no.2 lo 5 to forthwith act o r complaint/grievance raised by the Petitioner dated 0r" Respondents No. 6 and 7 from making illegal and un r PIot No.77, in Sy.No.159, admeasuring an extent o Narsingi Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dis r Petitioner here in. rrly one in the nature of espondents in not acting vide Complaint No. rer as illegal, arbitrary, juslice and consequently the representation and

12.2025 and restrain the rthorized construction on

500.00 Square yards of ct, which belongs to the lA NO: 1 OF 2025 petition under section 151 cPC praying that in he circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the Higl )ourt may be pleased to direct Respondent No. 2lo 5 to forthwith consider le representation dated 04.12.2025 and grievance lodged vide complaint No. I o.1112255612265 dated 11.12.2025, and take steps to restrain the Responde I No. 6 & 7 from making illegal and unauthorized construction on Plot No.77, ir Sy-No.1 59, admeasuring an extent of 500.00 Square yards of Narsingi Village, )andipet IVlandal, Rdnga Reddy District,, which belongs to Petitioner herein' Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NANI BABU ROBBA Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: GP FOR MUNICIPAI- ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DT VELOPMENT I Counsel for the Respondents No.2 & 3: S'C' FOR GH[lr ; counsel for the Respondent No.4: sRl LAXMAIAH KA\ ]HANl, S.C. FOR N IUNICIPALITIES Counsel forthe Respondent No.S: S.C. FOR HMDA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7: - The Court made the following: ORDER 'il&r,r.,- :ig! , IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.39O41 of 2025 Dated: L9.L2.2o25 Between Sri. Sreenivas Eleswarapu And The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Municipal Administration, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. ORDER ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS The writ petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the respondent No.4 in acting upon the representation and complaint lodged by the petitioner vide Complaint No..1112255612265 dated 11.12.2025, as being illegal and arbitrary and to forthwith direct the official respondents to stop the unauthorized construction being made by the respondents No.6 and 7 in Plot No.77, Sy,No.159, admeasuring 500 sq. yards, Narsingi Village, Gandipet Manal, Ranga Reddy District.

2. Mr. Laxamaiah Kanchani, learned standing counsel for the respondent No.4 - Municipality, submitted that subsequent to the 2 filing of the writ petition, the site of the responde r s No.6 and 7 was inspected and it was found that there is no const uction activity undertaken and the allegations made in the writ peti[ )n are false.

3. Since this Court is not going into the merits tf the matter, notice to respondents No.6 and 7 is dispensed with,

4. Recording the aforesaid submission of the lt:; rned standing counsel for respondent No.4 that no construc,i )n activity is undertaken by the respondents No.6 and 7 in the s I rject property, the writ petition is disposed of. However, if the res )ondents No.6 and 7 are, in any way. aggrieved, they are at I lerty to seek modification of this order. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if arr, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ST rASirl, )i P. PONNA KRISHNA : REGISTRAR PTANT \ \\ \FECTTON OFFTCER 1 //TRUE COPY// To

1. The Principal Secretary, Department of Municipa\ r\ lministration, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana.

2. The Cbmmissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Co I oration (GHIt/C), Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Commissioner, GHMC, Serlingampally Zone, Central Zone, 4. The ltlunicipal Commissioner, Narsingi Municipa il /. Gandipet Mandal, 5. The Town Planning Officer, Hyderabad Metropolitan Itevelopment Authority, District Commercial Complex, Administratie L-Block farnaka, Hyderabad - 500 007. Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District. Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

6. One CC to SRI NANI BABU ROBBA, Advocate [OPU() 7. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration and Urt rn Development, High 8 One CC to S.C. for GHMC IOPUCI 9. One CC to SRI LAXMAIAH KANCHANI, S.C. for Mun c palities [OPUC] 10 One CC to S C for HMDA [OPUC] 1 1 . Two CD Copies MP BS ft. I HIGH COURT DATI:-D:1911212025 .I r ^\ \\' .--. b \ *!-ln!- ^.\i ,o>,', * n ir., ORDER WP.Ncr 39041 of 2025 - Lr- a( a \\a,.^' . .r^ \, ,: DISPOSING OF THE \IIRIT PETITION I WI"HOUT COSTS \\ "{f*9. --