The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of the Respondents in not allofting paddy for Kharif 2025-26 inspite of the petitioner making complete deliveries for Crop Year Rabi 2019-2020 as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust, apart from being unconstitutional and contrary to doctrine of legitimate expectation, and consequently direct the Respondent authorities to allocate paddy for Crop Year Kharif 2025-2026 without reference to any penalties/interest allegedly for Rabi 2019-20 or otherwise. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ;ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co I t may be pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the recommendati,: t dated 26.11.2025 issued by the Respondent No.6 vide Lr.No.MTKGl44l)-tRabi 2024-2025 to Respondent No 4 for allotment of paddy for Crop Year Kt arif 2025-26 without reference to any penalties/interest. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI PASHAM MOHITH Gounsel for the Respondent Nos.1,4 & 5: GP FOR CIVIL St PPLIES Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2,3,6,7 & 8: SRI K.DEVEiI )ER, SC FOR TSCSCT The Court made the following: ORDER ,;i&r .**1.- -.;:ijt. is$-, Y IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT ITYDERABAI) THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION No.39O22 OF 2o2S DATE: L9.12.2O25 Betweea: M/s,Sri La-:<mi Modern Rice and Oil Mill & another The State of Telangana & 7 others AND ORDER: ...Petitioners ...Respondents In this writ petition, the petitioners are seeking to declare the action of the respondents in not allotting paddy for Kharif 2025-26 season inspite of petitioner making complete deliveries for Rabi 2Ol9-202O, as illegal and arbitrary.

2. It is submitted that the petitioners have given bank guarantee of IOo/o for the allotment of paddy for the current season, but the same has not been considered by the respondents. With regard to delay in delivery of rice for Rabi 2Ol9-2O, it is submitted that the petitioners and others have already made representations to the authorities and the same z is yet to be considered by the authorities and I aking the said circumstance into consideration, this Court in \l .P.No.35414 of 2024 dt.17.12.2024 had directed the responde :Lts to consider the representations ald take a decision tht: eon and also dirccted the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners in the meantime for allotment of CMR paddy I cr the current years subject to petitioners' furnishing 109: of the bank guarantee as required under G.O.Ms.No.27, dt. 19.1O.2024. It is submitted that inspite of the said direction, '.. Le respondents are again insisting the petitioners for additional I ank guarantee l, for shortfall rn supply of CMR rice for the period tOlg-2O2O and hence, this u,rit petition has been filed.

3. Learned Standing counsel appearing for rl trporation has forwarded the copy of the written instructions rt ceived by him, according to which in addition to the shortfall ,br Rabi 2019- 2020, lhere was delay in supply of CMR rice fr,r Rabi 2023-24 as well, and therefore, miller has to pay 25ok renalt5r & 12oh interest on the defaulted paddy in additional to 10%o bank grrarantee under G.O.Ms.No.17, dt.O4.O1.2025 Irtr allotment of paddy for KMS 2O25-26. ..,tr, 3

4. karned counsel for the petitioners however, furnished a copy of the 'No Due Certilicate' dt.14.10.2O25 issued by the District Manager, TGSCSCL, Peddapalli to demonstrate that the \ \ balance CMR due for Rabi 2023-24 will be recovered from the milling charges payable to the miller. Hb further submitted that petitioners' money is lying with the Corporation and if there is any delay 1n suplly of CMR on the part of the petitioners, they may recover the same from the amount payable to the petitioners and the petitioner is willing to give an undertaking to the said affect to the authorities.

5. In view of the above, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the 5th respondent to consider allotment of CMR paddy for Kharif 2025-26 to the petitioners by accepting the IO% of bank guarantee and also taking into consideration the undertaking to be given by them for retention of the monies payable to them towards the additional bank guarantee for the delay in delivery of CMR rice for Rabi 2023-24. The decision shall be taken within a period of one (01) week from the date of receipt of such al undertaking. 4

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed cf. There shall be no order ers to costs. Miscellaneous pet'l Lons, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed SD/-' .SRINIVASA REDDY ASi ISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ 'QgcrroN oFFlcER To

1. The Principal Secretary, Department of Consumer Affa,is, Foods and Civil - 9.rppt.,."., Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, State of Te I rngana. 2. The Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Telangana ljta'ie Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Having its registered office aa-3-65 rtl1/A, Block-b Civil , Suppl]es Bhavan, Somajiguda, Hyderabad-S00082 3. Vice Cha.irperson a1d Mqlglng Director, Telangana Stzr -. Civil Supplies 9orporation L]mite_d -3-655/1/A, Block-BCivit Supplies [] ravan, Somajiguda, Hyderabad-500082, Telangana 4. Commissioner of Civil Supplies, Telangana, Hyderabacl 5. District Collector, Peddapalli District 6. Additional Collector and EOED, Peddapalli District 7. District Civil Supplies Officer, Peddapaili District 8. Diskict Manager TGSCSCL, Peddapialli District 9. One CC to SRI PASHAM MOH|TH, Advocate [OPUC] '10. Two CCs to GP FOR CIVIL SUPPL|ES, High Court foi t re State of . Telan-gana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] 11. One CC to SRt K DEVENDER, S-C FOR TSCSCL [OprJ ]l 12.Two CD Copies PSK. PSK HIGH COURT DATED:1911212025 CC TODAY ORDER WP.No.39022 of 2025 _/.1 - a, 1: Art ,,1, /.-' ,. ,?- O )l' \ ' 't'Et' lffi 6) * ) DA] .,r I t t DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 1f ( .6