No.1 5, Road No.2, visiviton;i,'H.K.F;ffir, ilid#bad, Teransana v. The State of _ Telangani

s.srinivas, s/o. s.Jagannatham Age.q about 45 years, 9cq. pvt. service, R/o. prot No.1 5, Road No.2, visiviton;i,'H.K.F;ffir, ilid#bad, Teransana. AND PETITIONER

1. The State of _ Telangani, Rep by its f " n o r s ti.n"p! ) De p a rt m e n i,"i" i d n g 2. The District Re_gistrar,. Rang_a RgO$V District, O/o. Sony Complex. prashanth Nas6r, xtiratpaTrv 1i;"J,i.;iil, h)"iu; Reddy Dibtrici, n a s e c ieta ri a t, H'y* e ,"S e c reta ry, " Revenue Moosapet, Telangana

3. The Assistant Registrar of chits^(ARC)_prashanlh. |agar, sony comprex. Moosapet, Kukatpitry v .rJnctio'rlntriri, hilil Eistrict. 4' M/s.Vuaya Lakshmi chit Funds Hyderabad pvt. Ltd, Regd. office at H.No.11_ i3i*J;,x:%rs*.r:r,I,{##1,'ff"_{:#ffiff{,;h*ffi i i ll,li' r 1,Y"HS38 :l cT,,:jfi District. 5. M.unnuri Sidanna, S/o Sanoaia Plot No.2 and s,- Flit Vanasthalipuram, R. R. District. n Ag"q _about S0_yeqr.s, Occ. Business, RIo No.302, N.V.ResidAh.y,- Xrinrlinbgri - ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus dectaring the action of the respondents, more particutarly the respondents No'2 in not releasing the chit amounts of Rs.7,g s,gl1talong with interest 6percent per annum and a sum of Rs.50,000/- towards compensation and a sum of Rs'5'000/- towards costs from the amounts lying with Respondent No.2 in respect of Group No.WLCTO 6P/11 of Saroornagar Branch inspite of order passed in CC l:,,o.2912021 dt.28-01 -2022 on the file of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Conrmission, Ranga Reddy and to declare the same as illegal, discriminatory, unjust, unconstitutional more particularly being violative of Article 14 and 300A of the constitution of lndia and against the principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to release the amounts lying in the shape ol'fixed deposits of the chit series chit series Group No.WLCTO 6P111 of Saroornagar Branch as per the order passed in CC No.2gt2o21 dt.2g- 01-2022 on the file of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ranga Reddy to the petitioner by depositing the amount for realization. lA NO: 1 oF 20it5 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respc,ndent No.2 to release the amounts tying in the shape of fixed deposits of the chit series chit series Group No.WLCTO 6P/11 of Saroornagar Branch as per the order passed in CC No.29t2O21 dt.28-01 -2022 on the file of District Consunrer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ranga Reddy to the petitioner by deprositing the amount for realization in the interest of justice. Gounsel for the Petitioner : SRI K.R.K.GARGEYA c o u n s e'! fo r th e nes n o nf; 3f. 3'; l8i t?xil i;'x;tJAHIlr-Arr o N Counsel for the Rebpondents No.4&5 : The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH IIIRIT PETITION 0.38980 0F' 2o.25 Dat€: O8.O1.2026 Between: S. Srinivas .Petitioner AND The state of Telangana, Rep. by its principal secretar5r, Revenue and .Stamps Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & four others ORDER: ...Respondents Heard Sri K.R.K.Gargeya, learned counsel for the petitioner and smt. s.Sravanthi, Iearned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing for the respondents and perused the material on record. with their consent, this writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is questioning the action of the respondent ,__-.' 2 sK,J W.P.No.3898O of 2O2S Nos.2 to , 5 in not releasing the chit amount of Rs.7,85 ,9L7 / - along with interest @ 6% per annum and a sum of F1s.5O,000/- towards compensation and a sum of Rs.S,OOO/- towards costs from the amount lying the respondent No.2 despite the order passed in C.C.No.29 of 2A2L dal.ed 28.01.2022 on the file of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ranga Reddy District in respe<:t of Group No.WLCTO 6P / L I of Saroornagar Branch as illegal and arbitrary.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration has produced the written instructions issued by the respondent No.2 dated 07 .OL.2O26 and submits tfiat as per Section 20, Chit Fund Act, 1982 read with Rul,: 24 of the Telangana Chit Fund Rules, 2008 submits r:hat the respondent No.2 is strictly following the instructions issued by the commissioner and Inspector General (C&IG) vide Memo No.CF/AchaJal L28LL /2024, dated 07 .LO.2O25 and the Committee has been constitutr:d for disposal of complaints received from I 3 SK,J W.P.No.3898O of 2O2S subscribers against certain chit Fund companies (Akshara, Bhavithasri, Kanakadurga, Achala, vijayalakshmi, and Shubanandini) regarding non- settlement of dues to the prized, and non prized, subscribers. The petitioner has grievance against the respondent No.4-M/s. Vdaya Lakshmi chit Funds Hyderabad Private Limited. view of the sarne, the commissioner and Inspector General, Registration and stamps Department will follow the procedure for disposing the complaints made by the petitioner in due course and requested to pass appropriate orders.

4. In view of the submissions made by both sides, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent authorities to dispose of the complaints/ Tt / request made by the petitioner for release of amounts as per order passed in c.c.No.29 of 2021 dated 28.oL.2022 on the file of District consumer Disputes Redressal commission, Ranga Reddy District within three (3) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order by 4 sKrJ W.P.No.3898O of 2O2S issuing notice to the petitioner as well as the unofficial rcsponderrts and pass orders as per law and communi<:ate the same to the petitioner. There shall be no order €Ls to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed. SD/- S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Prl. Secretary, Revenue and(Stamps)Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Distri:t Registrar, Ranga Prashantl'r Nagar, Kukatpally state. Reddy District, O/o. 'Y'Junction, Ranga Sony Complex, Moosapet, Reddy District,Telangana \ \

3. The Assistant Regislrqr-o.f chits ({Rc) Prashanth Nagar, sony complex. lVloosapet, Kukatpally Y Junction, Ranga Reddy Distri-ct.

4. One CC b SRI K.R.K.GARGEYA, Advocate tOpUCI 5. Two ccs to GP FoR STAMPS AND REGlsrRATtoN, High court for the State of Tr:lsplgsna. [OUT]

6. Two CD Copies. BSK HIGH COIJRT DATED:08/0112026 I S c) O 0 7 ttB 2026 . l?l ORDER WP.No.38980 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS q J