The High Court · 2025

. Petition under Section. 3S9 (2) of BNSS praying that in the crrcumstances stated in me ,MemoraniTm oi'crorunos or criminar petition,the High court mav be oreased to- p"irit-'ine"'pIin;n"rrzno comprainant to the comoouno oneirce wittt ii"?l'p".oent No.2 to 5/A_1 to 5 to respondenudefacto ffi y Jfi # :Tyi,il:h?tffi *a ,,l,:,: {,*i:tu:r+elff ,j" # ;_ 3 petition under Section . .3S9 (8) R/w. S28 of BNSS praying that in the tr###[Jif,""t,,fi #:""*r,_,ltluri:,,"":,2,#.di"..,jf#li**ll: ;g[i*rr,*r#*[iix?rn[ri,]"_.ffi ,ii?tri]t":lffi **#f : I This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Ms. TANUSHREE BOSE ,Advocate for the Petitioners in Crl.Petition and Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 in l.A.Nos. 2 and 3 of 2o2s and sri JITHENDER RAo VEERAMALLA, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 in all petitions and SRI v. SEETHARAMA AVADHANI, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 in Crl.Petition and Petitioner in l.A.Nos. 2 and 3 of 2025. The Court made the following COMMON ORDER: I i IN THE HIGH COURT rlOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2O2S IN/AND 1 Date:23.12.20125 Between : G.Raghava Reddy and four others. Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 5 AND The State of Telangana, represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hydera6ad, and another ....Respondents COMMON ORDER: This criminar petition has been filed by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 5 seeking to quash the proceedings in c.c. No.4632 of 2o24 on the file of the xIV Additional chief- Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2' Heard Ms.Tanushree Bose, learned counser fof the petitioners, Mr'v'seetharama Avadhani, rearned counser for respondent No.2 and Mr'Jithender Rao Veeramara, learned Additionar pubric prosecutor, appearing on behalf of respondent No.1_State. 3' Learned counser for the petitioners submitted that during the pendency of the present Criminal petition, at the instance of the well t -l .l\i\ I I , 2 wishers, relatives and eld.ers, the parties have settled the disputes pending between them.and entered into compromise and filed Joint Memo. Accordingly, the parties have filed I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 seeking permission to compound the offence and to record the compromise resPectivelY.

4. This court uide order, dated 18.12.2025, directed the parties i.e.,thepetitionersandrespondentNo'2'toappearbeforetheHigh CourtLegalservicesCommittee,Hyderabad'on22'12'2025'In compliance of the said order, the secretary, High court Legal services committee, has submitted report, dated 20.12-2025, stating that the petitioners and respondent No.2 were duly identified with copies of their Aadhar Cards/Pan Card. lt is further stated that the parties have willfully and without any coercion entered into compromise' In view of the said report and also in view of the compro*i"to 5. entered between the petitioners and respondent No'2 as well as the submissions made by the respective parties, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 areallowed.Consequently,theproceedingsinC.C.No.4632of2024 on the fiIe of the xIV Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate' I Nampally,Hyderabad,areherebyquashedagainstthepetitioners'

6.Accordingly,thecriminalpetitionisallowed,subjecttopayment of costs of Rs.1O,O0o/- (Rupees ten thousand, only) to the High court Legal Services committee, Hyderabad, and Rs'S,OOO/- (Rupees five \ \ \ \ 1J thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, by the petitioners, on or before 09.01.2026. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/- NAYANI CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO DEPUTY //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1' The XIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2. The station House officer, panjagutta police station, Hyderabad. 3' Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. (OUT)

4. one cc to Ms. TANUSHREE BosE Advocate topucl 5. one cc to sRr. v. SEETHARAMAAVADHANI, Advocate [opUC] 6. Two CD Copies I v ( ALONG WITH A COPY OF JOTNT MEMO OF COMPROMISE) Note : Total Amount of Rs. 15,000/- ( Fifteen thousand only ) has been paid by Ms. r THANUSHREE BosE' counsel for petiiioner as directed by the Hon'ble court vide order dated23-12'2025 u. 11..10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the High court Legal Services committee. Hyderabad and Rs. 5.,000/- ( Rupees five thousani only ) to the Telangana High court Advocates Association, rryoerauad and filed memo as proof compliance USR No. 152693 of 2025 dated 3 t_n_;025. I I "F*G!t!* -*, o , r{ s I n i I +,, ,. l HIGH COURT DATED:23112t2025 COMMON ORDER NOS, 2 AND 3 OF 2025 NMNTD cRLP.No.17134 of 2025 .lt HE STA 0 7 jAN ?[26 -"4 ti, ( * ALLOWING THE CRL.PETITION AND I.A. NOS.2 AND 3 OF 2025 i rJII BI \-gi 3 ) 1oo O D HilT{ 100] -, oo1001 1 0o1 001 I t-! )lu orToEa -adrrr{T TELANGANA Tran ftj. !5 10301 643039 199-19 Dur!.: -10 OCT 20:5.04:45 pM Pun'h.sed 8y: r. G, EKNATH REDDY S/o C. RAGHAV.{ REDDY Rio TIYDERABAD For ll'hom 0 65 KONDA KAVTIHA LICENSED STAM 1, VE r-D( )ll Lic- No. l(!t)4-ofiJ?(rt(, Rto.Nu. l(rl){-0 I lr".O25 $-l-460164 Road No.4, Str(rlcv Nagar Banjam tlills Ht dcrabrd P[ 924ti256.19 - e MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum of Understanding is made and executed on this 31s .day of October 2025,at Hyderabad . BETWEEN: , G.EK].trATH REDDY, S/o.G.Raghava Reddy, aged about 3'l years, tVo.H. No.6-3-879lB, ltt floor, Greenland's Road Begumpet, Hyderabad-s00016. Hereinafter referred to as "First Parry/". AND ..K PRAGNYA REDDY, WO.G EKNATH REDDY aged about 37 years, R/o H. No.6-3-879lB, "znd floor, Greenland's road Begumpet, Hyderabad-s000 16. eHereinafter referred to as "Second, Party". L__ - BY GCVT. 139{/'l t, i!ii ,i,, ir- WITNESSES AS

1. WIIEREAS' the First Party and the Second Party ar€ husband and wife and their marriage was held on 19-O3-2O14 at Taj l,tlest End Hotel at Bangalore, as per Hindu Rites and Customs and the said marriage is an arranged marriage and a female child was born to them on l9-12-2Ola by name Gunampally Aanya Reddy.

2. WHEREAS, on account of marital discord, both parties are living separately from March 2O2O and their daughter Gunampally Aanya Reddy is staying with the Second Party.

3. \trHEREAS, the First Party herein filed Divorce Petition bearing O.P No. 668/2O2I on the lile of the II Addl Family Court, Hyderabad whibh was allowed on 19-10-2024 granting divorce to the parties. The said judgment and decree has been challenged by the Second Party in an Appeal before the Honble High Court in FCA No. 279 of 2024 and FCA No. 4 of 2O25 and the said appeals are admitted and the Hon'ble High Court, by its order dated 27 -12-2024 granted interim suspension of the family court's order and decree dated 19-LO-2O24.

4. WHEREAS, the Second Pargz hled a Complaint in crime no.226/2O22 before Panjagutta Police Station U/s 498A, 34lR/W 34 IPC, and 3 & 4 ofDP Act against the First Party and others on the lile of XIII Addl Chief ' -. Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad and the same is pending for trial. Further, Second Party also filed DVC No. 129 /2022 before the IVMM Court, Hyderabad and the same is pending. The Second Party also liled another complaint against the parents of the First Party and the tenants vide $C No.4632 /2024 in PS Panjagutta and the same is pending. The Second Part5r, as natural guardian and next friend of G. Aanya Reddy, fiI,ed a suit for partition in O.S No. 39O / 2023 before XXVI Addl Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad and the same is also lrending. All the proceedings before the Trial Court preferred by the Second Party are now ripe for evidence. ]; 5. WHEREAS, at this stage, the parties at tbe intcrvention of well-wishers, have settled the disputes amicably in order to put a quiehts to the marital discord. As such, this Memorandum of Understanding ("MoU') is executed between them in the presence of their parents to avoid any future disputes on the following terms and conditions: a. Both parties would submit this tr,tOU to tl.e Honble High Court seeking the indulgence of the with appropriate applications ARA OF 8y t394, ii\. 4 AA 1, 20a a!) c i I I I : I i i I 'I I i { Hon'ble High court to grant divorce on Mutual ccinsent and on the basis of the terms contained in this Mou and subject to furfirment of arl tl.e,terms of this MoU, compriance of which shall have to be reported to the Hon'rrle High co;rt. b. The First party agreed to give pennanent alimony of Rs. 1o,o0,0oooo (Rupees ten crores only) to the second party. Accordingly, the First party has paid a sum of Rs. Z,SO,OOOOOI_ (Rupees two crores and fifty lakhs only) by a demand draft bearing number 449199 issued by axis bank hyderabad ;;; 3r/ro/2025 . The balance amount of z,so,oo,oob 1*p.c" ".r.., crores fifty rakhs only) wourd be paid through a Demand Draft in favour of the second part5r which will be-handed over to the second party at the time of filing this Mou before the Hon,bre High court of Telangana. In view of the same, the second party waives her right to clairn any further maintenance or permanent alimony in future from the First part5r. c' The Second party sha, open a new bank account in any nationalized bank or any private bank in the name of the daughter of the parties viz. G. Aanya Reddy. since G. Aanya Reddy is a minor her mother K. pragnya Reddy, the Second Party herein' wourd operate and minage the bank account opened in the name of G. Aanya Reddy without any reference or interference by the First part,r. The First pargr fr"ieUy .*;.;; ;; co-operate and rend-cr'ful assistance to tr," second party in d' The First pa.ty shan co.operate with the Second party and assist in getting the pAN card for their d"ught", G. Aanya Re$dy. The pAN card of G. Aanya Reddy wil be ii ,t custody of " e' The First party shall co-operate with the. second party and assist in getting a passport for their daughter G- Aanya Reddy. The passport of G. Aanya Reddy w1l be in the ;,*r';;x Second Party. f. The First party shall pay a sum of Rs. 1S,0O,0OO00 (Rupees Iifteen crores only) to his daughter G. Aanya' Reddy for her maintenance and-educationar .*'p.rr".". irr. pi."t party .n11 naia a sum of Rs.2,50,0OOOO/_ (Rupees two,crores and fifty lakhs only) by way o{ cheque bearing number 2s4310 dated 31 4 "t#" iiliil r'iiii jl,i t. t. i L+ october, 2025 drawn on axis bank hyderabad. The balance amount of 12.5 crores (Rupees twelve crores fiffy lakhs) wouid be paid through a Demand Draft in favor of his daughter G. Aanya Reddy, which will be handed over to the Second Par,ty at the time of liling this MOU before the Hon'ble High Court of Telangana. t\rrther, the First Party, father of G Aanya Reddy, shall also unconditionally gift to G. Aanya Reddy, his daughter, an agricultural land admeasuring Ac. 4.35 guntas, in survey number 34A situated at Chilkamari village, Farooq Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, which is in his narne *ith a clear title,. The process of transferring the aforesaid property by executing a registered gift deed in the name of G. Aanya Reddy anil ati related d.ocumentation, including mutation, shall be completed before this Mou is flled before the Hontle High Court. The First Party assures that the property is and shall be free from all encumbrances, disputes, third party claims, charges, liens etc. for her maintenance and educational expenses. : ' g. The father of the First Party, G. Raghava Reddy, who is also the grandfather of G. Aanya Reddy, out of his love and affection for his granddaughter,..decided to grft to G. Aanya Reddy the agricultural land admeasuring Ac. 6.06 guntas, in survey number 311, 310/e, 312 situated at Dooskal village, Farooq Nagar Man'dal, Mahbubnagar DiStt'ict, Whl'bh is in tiis name''.with a clear title. The process of transferring the aforesaid properties by executing a registered gift deed in the name of G..Aanya Reddy and all related documentation, including mutation, slrdll be completed before this MoU is filed before the Honble High Court. The fattrer of the First Party assures that the property is and shall be free from a-ll encumbrances, disputes, third party , claims, charges, liens etc. The father of the First Party is a{Iixing his signature to this MoU as consenting witness in token of his acceptance to the provisions made herein and to secure th3" future ofhis granddaughter out of love and affection. h. The bank account/s t properties gifted to G. her mother K. PragnYa Aanya Reddy attains affairs. In the event manage the aforesaid, G. Aanya Reddy shall I 7 c-'-- of G. Aanya Reddy and the aforesaid Aanya Reddy shall be rnanaged solely by Reddy, the Second Party herein, until G. the legal capacit5r to manage her own of K. Pragnya Reddy being unable to then both the maternal grandparents of manage the aforesaid, either jointly or 4 ...!: ( severally untii G. Aanya Reddy attains the legal capacit5r to manage her own affairs. fli'lj jlll, .t i. The jewelry of the second p*ty, which were given by her parents, First Party and his family members are kept in locker nos 129 and 5o4 in A.:<is Bank, somajiguda Branch. The lockers are held in the joint names of the parties herein. The First party agreed to open the lockers arong wiilr the second party and hand over all the jewellery and contents of the said rockers to. the second Party for her absolute use and benefit. -The joint custody of the lockers shall thereafter end and the Second parry shall be free to dear with the same in any man.er the second Parfy deems fit. j. subject to the First partSr and his father performing their respective obligations set out in this Mou, the second party will withdraw her complaint filed against the First party and his parents U/s 498A Ipc vide crim'e No. 226/2022 and, another case filed by her vide crime No. 6s6/2023 and the second party should give necessar]r retters to the police or before the concerned magistrate for withdrawing the said cases and if necessary, the rerevant parties wilr appear before the Honble High ' cotrrt in euashing the said 2 cases in the quash proceeding and the second party sha[ consent to the quashing of the said cases in terms of this Mou. rne secona party will also withdraw the DVC No. r2gl2o22 pending before the IV MM court in terms of this lViou. The second party will withdraw the suit for partition bearing o.s No. 39o/2to23 pending before ruffI. Addl Chief Judge, Ciry Civil Court, Hyderabad. k. Guardianship and Visitation of G. Aanya Reddy: i. The First Party has no objection to declare that the second Farty is the natural guardian of the minor child G. Aanya Reddy and the Second party shall alone have permanent custody of the child G. Aanya Reddy and the First Party waives off his rights to custody of G. Aanya Reddy. ) I i 'l iL u

1. If G. Aanya Reddy wishes to visit her father' she shall have tJ:e right to do so with the Second Party giving reasonable notice to the First Party

2. The First Party shall interact with his daughter G Aanya Reddy once in Iifteen days for 3O Minutes between 6 and 6:30 PM in virtual mode;

3. Further, when G. Aanya Reddy is in Hyderabad, the First Party shall physically visit her fot 4 hours monthly once preferably on Saturday during a time convenient to her and First Party.

4. when G Aanya Reddy is living away from Hyd.erabad, the First Party shall physically visit her in the city / town where she is living for 4 hours every.2 months during a time convenient to her and the First Party. ii. The First Party agrees to attend the School Annual Days and convocation of G. AanYa ReddY. iii. H--o.yeye1, the First Party shall have visitation rights to visit d. a"ny" Reddy by giving reasonable notice to the Second PartY. l. The Second PartJr shall vacate from the house bearihg No. H-6-3- 879/8, znd floor Greenland's, Begumpet, Hyderabad voluntarily and should handover possession of the said house to the First Party on or befoi'e 15th May, 2026. [n view of the aforesaid understanding among the parties, the parties 6. are at liberty to Lead their own individual lives and shall: not interfere yith the life of the other or cause any hindrance in their afrairs in future' T. Except for the enforcement or the implementation of the terms of this MoU, the parties to this MoU shall not initiate any other false or frivolous civil or criminal proceedings against each other' q __) ,-^ro 8r OF t :;. t\f! f. -::,i -.i ;tc shall farthfully adhere rn their respective purpose of this MoU is Iives. to the letter and spirit to resolve the U: The parties of the ,.rrIJ;;" '" this Mou ",T r:ilT"y,'rk: oi'p u i"" 9. This ts retaining a copy of the same. Mernorandum of Understanding ,t

2. (r ;f;fs#i^,$s#", ,\. 1) 2) /Gv1rt %, rs made in two sets and each CONSEN?ING (c FIAVA REDDY) ! l : I