Jaiula Pandu Goud. S/o Late Aqamaiah Goud v. 1. The State of Telangana

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B.MADHU SUDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondents: Ms. T.SWETCHA, AGp FOR F EVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.38927 of 2025 DATE OF ORDER: LA.L2.2O25 BETWEEN: Jajula Pandu Goud AND The State of Telangana Rep. by its PrinciPal SecretarY, Revenue Department and 3 others Petitioner ... Respondcnts : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following prayer: '...ro issue a Wit or Direction or art Order more particularllJ one it the nature of Wit of Mandcurtus to declare the' itoctiotl of tlrc respondents No.2 to 4 in not includirtg the petilioners lirrrrl i,r E-Pass Book No.T05O9OO21158 it Khata No 60528 itr respect of the lc.nd in Sg.No.33O/A1/2/AA, to an extent of Ac.'O 24 Gts, Sttuatecl at Adibatla (Aditga Nagar) Village' Ibrahimpatan Mandal, R R Disl in Spite of receipt o.f representation dated 1 6/ 1 1 / 202 5 and apphcations througlt tn'ee seua dated 2O/O2/2O23 and l4/O6/2022 mode bU tlrc petttioner as iltegot, arbttrary, unconstitutional, uiolatiue of 'pinciples of natiroJ ystice and violatiue of Article 14,21 arrc] A of tie Constitution of htdia and consequentlg direct tle '3OO responients to inclucle the surueg and subdiuisiort nurnber r.nd exlent in the reuenue records cts uell as in the Dharanti Porlal and issue new p(lttodar pass Dook [n respect of tle aboue soid land..." !r-\ *'T \ 2

2. Hearcl learnecl counsel for the lrr titioner ald Ms.T.Swetcha, learned Assistant Governmer t pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents. perusec he record. 3. Learned counsel lor the petitioner wotl ( submit that the petitroner is Lhe bona,fid e purchaser of ag: cull ural land rn Sy.No.322/tr1/2, admeasuring Ac.O.B guntas and Sy.No.33o/A t l2/ AA, admeasuring Ac.O.24 ;unras, total exl ent of Ac O .32 guntas situated at Adibatla ,, ,clit.ya Nagar) Village, Ibrahimpatan Mandai, R.R. Distrir I pr-rrchased thc origin;rl landlord regrstered I)oc. No 586 / 20 1 7 , datcd tg .OB .2O 17 reglst : .cd at SRO Ibrahimpatan, R.R. District Upon purchasi r g tl-re same, the petitioncr approached respondent No.4 and filed a petition in Form No.6 under Rtrle lB read with iection 4 (l ) of A.P.R.O.R Act, Igilg, for inclusion of lan,j in revenue rccords. Reslro.rclcnt No.4 by its dated 2Z .() |.2019 uid.e Proce. No. tr/3 O4g / 201g, passed appropriate r,. ders under Section 5(2) ot the ROR Act, 19g9 amended o 1971 r,r.ith regard to S.v.No.322/6, and S1,.No.330/eo l/2 / s, situated at Adibarla Ellg., Ibrahimpatan Mandal. 3

4. That being the case, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that contrary to the said proceedings in respect of Sy.No.322/6a, land to a11 extent of Ac.O.13 guntas u,as incorporated in the revenue records and issued pattedar passbook vide E-pass Book No.T05O9O02 115g in Khata No.60528, and rest of the land to an extent of Ac.O.24 gutnas situared in Sy.No.33O /sl/2/e was not yet incorporated in the revenue records. Accordingly, the petitioner had made a necessary online application on 14.06.2022 and again on 20.O2.2023. Since no action has been taken b_y the respondent authorities, on 16. ll.2O2S, the petitioner made a representation to respondent Nos.2 to 4 for mutation and adding the Sy.No.33O/ee1/2/e in E-Pass Book No.TOSOSOO2 1158 in Khata No.60528. Since, no action has been taken by respondent Nos.2 to 4, present n,rit petition has been filed by the petitioner. Hence, he would seek to pass appropriate orders.

5. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue would submit that the case of the petition& Qould be considered in due course of time, by 4 following tl-re procedure established und: . Iaw, after lssulng necessar], notices to all concern:I and after grantlng sufficicr-rt opportunit-y of hearing ar-r aplrropnate orders r.r,ould be passecl b_y rcspondent No.3 would seek lo pass appropriatc orders. Hence, she

6. Having heard learned counsel for tlt: petitioner, learncd Assistant Covernmcnt pleader for f evenue and upon perusal of the materials placed before i; Court, this Court rvithout going into mcrits or demerits :f the case, deems it appropriatc to direct respondent No.l to exanine the represcntation dated 16.1 l.2O2S filed by , re petitioner uide transaction ID No.30T36320 OOO,2: )2, 20.O2.2023 and transaction ID No.3O72S4OOO-1 O34, dated 14.06.2022, b_v issuing nccessarJ_ notices to ti e petitioner and alI other intcrested parties and by grant I g sufficlent pass appropriate orde;. , st rictll. in accordance with law, as expeditiously rr possil)le. preferably, \vrthin a period of ninet-v (90) workil l days from the date of receipt of a copy ol-this order. opportunity of hearing, deLted (- \ I I I I Ill. I 5

7. With the above directions, this writ petition 1S disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. To, '1 . The Principal Telangana. //TRUE COPY// sd/- M LI RAO EGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER Secretary, Revenue Department, erabad, State of

2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Kongara Ravirala, Telangana State

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ibrahimpatan Division, At Ibrahimpatan, R.R Dist, T.S

4. The Tahsildhar, lbrahimpatan Mandal, At lbrahimpatan, R.R Dist. 5. One CC to SRI B.MADHU SUDHAN RAO, Advocate tOpUCl 6. Two CCs to GP for REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

7. Two CD Copies BSR MP W a HIGH COURT DATED:1811212025 ORDER WP.No.38927 ot 2025 ,i' I TAS J Ai{ ?il2E I ) : .4.'r <r"'/ DlsPostNg oF THE WRIT PET|TION, WITHOUT COSTS a D 1 r \