✦ High Court of India · 17 Sep 2025

Mrs.Ateeqa Begum v. 1. The State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 17 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
17 Sep 2025
Length
1,241 words

2, The Commissioner of Police,, Hyderabad at Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, South Zone at Purani Hyderabad. 4. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Bhavani Nagar, Hyderabad. 5. The Station House Officer, Rein Bazar Police Station, Yakatpura, Hyderabad. 6. Smt.Syeda Nayeem Sultana, Wo.Mohd Layeq Hussain, Aged about 53 years, Occ Housewife, Fl/o.H.No.18-8-589/39, LCH, Near Masjid lvlustafa, Kummarwadi Colony, Edi Bazar, Hyderabad.

7. Layeq Husain, S/o.Not Known, Occ Head Constable in CID Department, Masab Tank, Hyderabad, Fl/o.H.No.18-8-589/39, LCH, Near Masjid Mustafa, Kummarwadi Colony, Edi Bazar, Hyderabad.

8. Rahman Hussain, S/o. Layeq Hussain, Rt/o.H.No.1B-B-589/39, LCH, Near I\rlasjid lMustafa., Kummarwadi Colony, Edi Bazat, Hyderabad.

9. Kamal Hussain, S/o.Layeq Hussain, Rl/o.H.No.1B-B-589/39, LCH, Near tvlasjid [\ilustafa, Kummarwadi Colony, Edi Bazar, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 5. in not registering the criminal case, FIR and not causing arrest of the respondents 6 to 9 in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment over the petitioner landed property bearing House No.17-3-1BOl12lBl5 admeasuring 52.38 sq.yards including one mulgi on ground floor and one room at cellaur and open space bounded by North- Grave Yard, South-tMain Road, East-Neighbours house beari East-Neighbors house bearing N0.1 7-3-1 86/'1 2/A/4 situated i Zohara Bee Dargah, Yakatpura, Hyderabad and also not pro' the petitioner and her family members including petitioner pro orders in 1.A.No.218 of 2015 in O.S.No.2442 of 2015 dated 6- p no.17-3-111C14, t lmambada, near iding protection to lerty inqpite of the 0-2015 passed by the Hon'ble V Junior Civil Judge City Civil Court and also insp te of the petitioner written complaints dated 4 - 1 O -20 1 5, B- I 0-20 1 5 and 24-9-201 (; rs illegal, arbitrary, unjust and also against Article 300 A of constitution of lndia ir rd also against the provisions of o IPC and Criminal Procedure Code and conse(lr the respondents 2 to 5 to take immediate steps for registratic FIR and cause of arrest of the respondents 6 to I basing on t,l complaints dated 4-10-2015,8-10-2015 and 24-9-2016 and it the injunction orders in 1.A.No.218 of 2O15 in O.S.No.2442 ,r 2015 passed by the Hon'ble V Junior Civil Judge City Cit,i ential d irections to n of criminal case, e petitioner written so in pursuance of 2015 dated 6-10- Court Hyderabad immediately. l.A.NO:1 OF 2016 (WPMP.NO:4'1139 O F 2016) Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circ( mstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court direct the respondents 2 to 5 to take immediate steps for re,J case, FIR and cause of arrest of the respondents 6 to 9 basir written complaints dated 4-1O-2O15, B-10-2015 and 24-9 - nay be pleased to stration of criminal g on the petitioner 2016 and also in pursuance of the injunction orders in LA.No.21B of 2015 in C) dated 6-10-2015 passed by the Hon'ble V Junior Civil Jurl Hyderabad immediately pending disposal of the above writ pet S.No.2442 oI 2015 le City Civil Court :ion. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI J.VIJAY KUMAR GOUD (NOl\ E APPEARED) Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 : SRI R.LAXMIKANTI- REDDY, AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 to 9 : - The Court made the following ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITIO N No.33295 0F 2016 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed with the following relief: "-. to issue a wnt or order more particulatly one in the flature of writ of mandamus declerlflq thc action of thc respondents 2 to 5. in nor registering the crirninal case, FIR and o[ the rcspondeots 6 to 9 in interfering with dre peaceful possession and ,rot .a,,sing "....t ..rj.,*-.nt',r.". rhe petitioncr landed properry bearing House Noll-3-186/12/9/5 acimeasunog i2.i8 sq-y'ards inctuding one muJgi on gtormd floor and one room at cellar en<l opec space bounded b-l iiorth-Grave \-atd, South-N{ain Road, East Neighbots house Ll.a,r,ig ,,., 1r -.i I 1/C/.t, East-Ne,ghbours house bearing NO.17-3-186/ 12/A/ 4 situated at Irnrmbaria, tczr 'Zohatt Bee Darga-h, Yakatpura, Hydeabad and also not proriding prorectioo to rhe peutiooet and het family membets iocluding petitioner propertv inspitc of rhc orders rn L-\.No-218 oi 2015 in O.S No.2442 of 2015 dated 6-10-2015 Passed by rhe [{on'ble \'-[unior Civil Judge City Civil Court and also inspite of the peritroner written complrrnts clared 4-10 2015, 8-10 2015 lnd 2+9-2016 as illega! arbitmry' uniust and also againsr \ritcie i00 \ ofcoostitutioo of India and also ag'ainst the provisions of o IPC and Cnrnrnal l)rocetlure Code and colsequential dtections to dre tespondeats 2 to 5 ro take rmmetir:rte stcps tor registrauon of ctiminal case, FIR and cause of arresr of rhc resooldcnts 6 Io 9 basing on thc Petltioner wdftefl complaiots dated 4 10-2015, 8-10 2015 2+'.r lttt6 and also rn pursuance of the injurrction orders in IlNo'218 of 2015 io ",,.i () S \o.l-1-11 r)a l01j dated 5 l0 2015 passed by the Hoo'ble \r Junior Civrl Judge Ctrt' (lrrrl (.oLrrr I f r i[rabad immediate1y......"

2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

3. Hcard \{r.R.Laxmikanth Reddy, learned Assistant G<rr-crrrnrcirt Pleader tor Flome appe rlng for respondent Nos ito5

4. L.carned .\ssistant Government Pleader for Home submits that, upon consideration of the petitiofler's written comPiaint, rhe policc aurholiries fcrund that the allegations u/efe civil in nature and, rherettrre, n() crimc was registered. It is firrther subritted rirat the 2 peririoner thereafter approached the iurisdictional I tagistrate by way of a private comPlalnt, Pursuant to which Crirr e No' 45 of , 2016 was registered and furthel proceedings were initiated in accordatce u'ith law.

5. I have carefully perused the materials ofl record 6 Having regard to tht: PtaYer of the petitioner ft r registration of a crime on the basis of his rvritten complaints dat: I 04'10'2015, 08.10.2015, and 24.0().2t)16, and in vierv oic the 'act that the petitioner has already approachecl thc competent Cot rt and fiied a private complaint u'hicl-r ri'as ci r-iiy l.z,ken on tile, therel y resulting in registration of Crime No. -l: ()f :i.)'16. this Court is -[the opinion that the grievance of thc pcriliorcr stands efttecti":ly redressed' Consequently, nothinq l'rt-rher sr-ir-;i.i'es ibr adiudicat r n in this writ petrEon. Accordinglr,, thc \\-fit P C f-1tlOn 1"s dismis; :d AS having become infructuous. Tl'rerc sirall t;c no ordcr as to cos -s' Miscellaneou5 pgiifi{)us.

1.,lr.rllrig if anv, sirall sta rd closed. sD/- E P tSi' \BDULLAH KHAN ANT REGIS!BAk-- //TRUE COPY// To'" 1. T*o CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the St Hyderabad. [OUTI a f q ECTION OFFICER t -l r langana at a . One CC to SRI J.VIJAY KUIMAR GOUD' Advocate [OPU(] . Two CD CoPies 2 3 HIGH COURT DATED:17 10912025 ORDER WP.No.33295 of 2016 DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT GOSTS. a

11.1

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments