The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the Petitioner/Accused No 3 in C.C.No.36 of 2024 on the file of the Xlll Addl, Judicial Magistrate of First Class, RangaReddy District at Rajendrangar. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioner/Accused No 3 in C.C No.36 of 2024 on the file of the Xlll Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, RangaReddy District, at Rajendranagar pending disposal of the main Criminal Petition. / tI LA. NO: 3 OF 202s Between: Juveria Sadiq Subhan, Wo Mohd Sadiq, Aged about 55 yrs, Occ, Housewife, R/o Flat No.317, Phase-|, metro Palmgrove Apts, Somajiguda, Hyderabad ...Petitioner/Respondent No. 2/De-facto Complainant AND

1. Mohd Amer. S/o Mohd Ataur Rahman, Aged about 32 yrs, Occ. Advocate, R/o H.No 8 28, Shaheen Nagar, Zam Zam Bakery, Pahadi Shareef Road, Rangareddy District. ...Petitioner/Accused no.3

2. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. ...RespondenURespondent No. 1 Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner/respondent No.2 compound the offences with the respondent No.1/petitioner/ Accused No.3 by allowing the Criminal Petition filed by the petitioner against CC.No.36 of 2024 on the file of the Xll Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, RangaReddy District. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record compromise with between the petitioner/Respondent No.2/ de-facto complainant and the Petitioner/accused No.3 and the proceedings against the petitioner/accused No.3 may be quashed in C.C.No.36 oI 2024 on the file of the Xlll Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, RangaReddy District. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lt/lemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. G. Sanjeeva Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Mr. Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of Mr. N. Mahesh Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2, The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THP STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2o25 IN AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.17O33 of 2025 Date:24.12.2o25 Between: Mohd. Amer AND The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, and another Petitioner/ Accused No.3 ...Respondents COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been filed by the petitioner/accused No.3 seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C. No.36 of 2024 on tl:.e file of the XIII Additional Judicial Magisirate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District at Rajendranagar.

2. Heard Mr.G.Sanjeeva Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.N.Mahesh Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.2, and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of respondent No. I -State.

3. karned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during the pendency of the present Criminal Petition, at the instance of the well 2 wishers, relatives and elders, the parties have settled the disputes pending between them and entered into compromise and filed Joint Memo. Accordingly, the parties have hled I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 seeking permission to compound the offences and to record the compromise respectively.

4. This Court uide order, dated 18.12.2025, directed the parties i.e., the petitioner and respondent No.2, to appear before the High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, on or before 22.12.2025. In compliance of the said orders, the Secretary, High Court tegal Services Committee, has submitted report, dated, 22.12.2O25, stating that the petitioner and respondent No.2 were duly identified with copies of thcir Aadhar Cards. It is further stated that the parties have wiltfully and without any coercion entered into compromise.

5. In vicu, of the said report and also in view of the compromise entered between the petitioner and respondent No.2 as well as the submissions made by the respective parties, I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the proceedings in C.C. No.36 ol 2024 on the I'ile of the Xltl Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District at Rajendranagar, are hereby quashed against the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed, subject to payment of costs of Rs. 1O,OOO/- (Rupees ten thousand only) to the High Court J l,egal Services Committee, Hyderabad, and Rs.S,OOO/ - (Rupees five thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates' Association, Hyderabad, by the petitioner, on or before 09.01.2026. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/- S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// - ._ _t SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 3 4 The Xlll Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District at Rajendranagar. . The Station House Officer, Moinabad Police Station, Cyberabad. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, State of Telangana, High Court Buildings, at Hyderabad (OUT) . One CC to Mr. G. Sanjeeva Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] . One CC to Mr. N. Mahesh Reddy, Advocate IOPUC] M*',',i^ Two CD Copies ,,s"d i copl, of Joinr Memo) Note: Total Amount of Rs. '15,0001 ( Rupees Fifteen thousand only ) has been paid by Sri G. Sanjeeva Reddy, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 24.12.2025 as Rs. 10,0001 ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the " High Court Legal Services Commiftee, Hyderabad, and Rs.5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memoas proof of compliance USR No. 3552 of 2026 dated 09,01.2026. l)t./l,sL HIGH COURT DATED:24l1212025 I COMMON ORDER l.A. Nos. 3 and 4 oI 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.17033 of 2025 \ \ HL STAI: .r l/-. o 1l fEBM * Qr e-.{ ): * ALLOWING l.A. Nos. 3 and 4 of 2025 and CRIMINAL PETITION W )I / /-* / /t / IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA STATE AT HYDERABAD BETWEEN: Crl,P.No. of 2025 Juveria Sadiq Subhan, W/o Mohd Sadiq, Aged about 55yrs, Occ: Housewife, R/o Flat No.317, Phase-I, metro Palmgrove Apts, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, ... Petitioner/respondent No.2/ De-facto complainant And 1

2. Mohd Amer, S/o Mohd At:,:ur Rahman, Aged about 32yrs, Occ: Advocate, R/o H.No.B-28, Shaheen Nagar, Zam Zam Bakery, Pahadi Shareef Road, Rangareddy District, .,. Petitioner/Accused No,3 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State ofTelangana, Hyderabad. .,.,Respondent/ Respondent No.l JOINT MEMO It is submitted that the petitioner/respondent No.2 herein filed the present joint Memo to compound the offences as against the Petitioner/Accused No,3 as the matter is settled out of court amicably in view of the fact that the petitioner. For the reasons stated above, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner/respondent No.2 herein to compound the offence with the Respondent No,l/Accused No.3/ Petitioner herein by allowing the Criminal Petition filed by the 3"* MD. ,ti-. Petitioner and proceedings against them may be quashed in C.C,No.3i :e '-o24 on the file of the Xlll Addl, Judicial Magistrate of First Class, RangaBeddy District and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, Place: Hyderabad Dated: Counsel for the P ccused No.3 Counsel for the Petitioner/Responden t No.2 ^l.J^,rA "aJ', ,Jfr,,,b- De-facto- Complainant D Peti er/Accused