Mrs K Padmaja v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, order or dtrection more particularly one in the nature of Writ of [\,4andamus declaring the inaction on the Part of Respondents No.2 and 3 in not executing the Rectification Deed in respect of Deed of Conveyance (Doc No. 3193/2016) dated 01-07-2016 on the file of Joint Sub-Registrar, Vallabh Nagar as illegal, unfair, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct Respondents No.2 and 3 to Execute a Rectification Deed, Rectifying the Survey Number, Village Name and lncorporating the Premises Number and Plot Number etc., which was wrongly menttoned in the Deed of Conveyance. l.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 cpc praying that in the .i. umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court mz, be preased to direct the Respondent No 3 to consider the Representation made t, petrtioner on 22-10- 2025 lo Rectify the mrstakes committed in the Convey: rce Deed (Doc. No. 3193i2016) dated O1-07-2016 on the frte of Joint Sub_Reg i;trar pending disposal of the writ petition. Vallabh Nagar Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRIN|VAS POLAVARAPU counsel for the Respondents : Ms. sNEHrrHA, AGp FoR A isTGNMENT The Court made the following ORDER IN THE HIGI{ COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD l THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.38791 of 2o25 DATE OF ORDER: tZ.t2.2O2S Between: Mrs K. Padmaja AND Petitioncr The State of Telangana, lep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Assn-l) Department, Sccrctariat Buitdings, and others Respondents ORDER: This Writ petition, Constitution of India, is filed under Article 226 of rhe seeking the following reliel: "...pleased lo issue Writ, ord_er or clirection more particularly one in the nature of Wnt of Mandanus declaing the inaction on the part of Resjorulents No.2 and 3 in not executing the Rectification Deed in respect oJ leed of Conuegance (Doc No.3193/2O16) dated O1 O7_ 2O16 on the ftle of Joint Sub_Registrar, Vallabh Nagar as Prge 2 ol5 \ illegal, unfair, arbitrary dnd uioLatiue of Artic t 3O0 A of tlLe Cottstitution of India and conseque r Responderls No.2 and 3 to Exeatte a Rectificat Rectifuitq the Surueg Number, Village ,Y' Irrcorpon irtq the Premises Number and Plot L't i ulti<:h u,cts u)ronglA merliorted in tlrc Deed of ()' t ctttd to pttss. -... " 14 and tlg tli'ect tn Deed, 'tle rtn.d tbet clc., rueautl(-e

2. Hcard Sri P.Srinivas, learned counsel app( aring for the pctitioner ancl Ms. Snehitha, learned Assistan' Goverumcrt( Plcader lor Assignment, for the respondents an. perused tht: re<:ord

3. Learned counsel appearing lor the pet i ioncr woulci sllbmit that the petitioner herein has purcl-r r sed a housc bearing No.6 a5/ 103, admeasuring 239 s( .yards (200 sq.,\'ards ir-r plot No.103 and 39 sq.yards in p[ ,t No. l l4) in S-.No.49, situated at Yadamma Nagar, Damr raiguda, Olrl Ahial Village, Alwal Municipality, Ranga Redcl. District from Mr.B.Srininvas, through a registered sale r leed bearing document No. 31BB/2OO0, dated 20.10.2000. f ubsequently, tl-re petitioner found 2OO sq.yards of Iand out of 239 sq.yards purchased by her to be a Government Por: mbol<c Land sitr-rated at Sv-No.377. Immediately, the petitic r rer submitted Pagc 3 ol-5 an application to respondent No.3 to regularize 200 sq.yards of land under G.O.Ms.No.59, Revenue (Assn-l) Department dated 13.12.2O14 r l.ur, G.O.Ms.No. 12 Revenue (Assn-l) Department dated 3O.01.20 15. Respondent No.3 considered the application of the petitioner in file No.B/3221 l20 I5 and afler collecting the necessary charges executed a Deed of Conveyance uide document No.3l93/2016, dated Ol.O7 .2016 in favour of the petitioncr to an extcnt of 20O sq.vards 1n S-v.'.No.278, situated at Yadamma Nagzrr, Malkajgiri Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

4. However, there was a mistake occurred in respect of survey number. The actual survey number rs 377 but llot 278 as mentioned in the Conveyance Deed s'ith r-cgard to the name of the village, instead of Al'"val Village, the Conveyar-rce Deed mentioned Malkajgiri Village and Mandal. The petitioner immediately approached respondent No.3 in July, 20 I B itself ald requested respondent No.3 to execute a Rcctification Deed. Respondent No.3 in fact signed the Rectification Deed in July, 2O18 but not coming lorward lor registration of the Rectification Deed on the ground that the I Pagc ,l ol-5 District Coller:tor htrs to approve the c'>:, cution zrnd rcgistratroll of the Rectification Deed. Again in t re yezLr 2O 19 also tl're pctltioner zrpproached respondent No.3 irr execution ol Rectification Dccd. Thc Tahsildar even tho u 1 h signed the Deed of Rectil'rcatior-r, h:r.s lailed to do registratir n ol the seud documcnt. Iior the last seven years tho petitioner IS approacl'rir-rg r-espondcnt Nos.2 and 3 for ': (ecuting the rcctilication clcecl l>r,rt the respondent authorili: ; lailed to do so. Due to u'hicl-r, the petitioner is un;r, e to oblain sanctionecl pian for construction of house arcl : Iso urrarblc to scll hcr plot t.() the third parties in view of -l-re mistzrkes occurred in thr: Conveyancc Deed dated 01.O 7.2016. Thc pctitiorrer also submitted a representation daL.'1 22.1O.2O2'r to respondcnt No.3, but respondent No.3 has rr rt acted upon it. Hence, thc Jrreserrt writ petition

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader f c r Assrgnment r,r,ould submit thzrt the case of the petitio rer is ut-rder consideration lhe respondent authorities wil consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordanc : with law. I Pagc 5 of5

6. In the light of the aforesaid facts and circumstances oi. the case and upon perusing the material available on record, this writ petition is disposed of, directing thc responclent authorities to consider the case of the petitioner and l)ass appropriate orders in accordance with larrr. If the respond ellt-authorities are not inclined to accept the request made by the petitioner, they shall pass an order assigning specific rezlsons and communicate copy o[ the sard orcier to the petitioner. They shall complete the entrre e_xercise as cxpeclitiotrsly as possible and as per the procedure laricl dorvn under laq,. There shall be no order as to costs. Misccllaneous petitions, if any, pending in this n.rrt petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. C. DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR .-n,/.(_> SECTION OFFICER Jrare or tetangana at Hyderabad. , Ill_I:ig,Iit-i::,"iqry, Revenue (Assn_t) Department Secretariat Buitding. 2. The District colector, rniegrated District colectorate office Antaipa[y, ^ Shamirpet Mandat Medchat-tr.rtatka'igirt District. 3 The Tahsitdar, Alwal Mandal Medi6al_Malkajgiri District. 4. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Couriior tf," Strt" of Tetangana at ! 9n" CC to SRt SR|N|VAS POLAVARAPU, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies Hyderabad. [OUT] I I I I I I I i To SA GJP I irii: SfA G- ll, i,l I i'i l{: l i1.< '.\ r1 \\:-4\. -t HIGH COURT DATED:1711212025 ORDER WP.No.38791 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. a