The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in FIR No.650 of 2025, daled 2211112025 on the file of SHO PS Nirmal Town against the Petitioner/Accused. l l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petitron, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings rn FIR No 650 o'f 2025, dated 2211112025 on the file of SHO PS Nirmal Town against the Petitioner/Accused including his arrest. 7 LA. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: Kulakarni Ananya, D/o.Kulakarni Anil Kumar, Aged :rl out 27 years, Occ Student, R/o,H. No.'1-3-'1 5511712011 , Dattatreya Nagar, Ni mal. Dist. Nirmal. ...PET TIONER/ACCUSED AND

1. The State of Telangana, through SHO PS Nirmal --, wn, Rep by Public Prosecutor High Court for the State of Telangana.

2. Ravula Sai Sandeep alias Sandeep, S/o.Srinivas, Aged rbout 28 years, Occ. Student, R/o.H.No.3-40714-15, Hi-Tech City, Road No 7, lr/ancherial, Dist. MancheriaL ..RESPONDENT/DEFAC TO COMPLAINANT Petrtron under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that t the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition. he High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to compromise the ca;: in FIR No.650 of 2025, dated 22.11.2025 on the file of SHO PS Nirmal Town l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that r the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition. he High Court may be pleased to record the compromise and quash the FIR Nr> 650 of 2025, dated 22.11.2025 on the file of SHO PS Nirmal Town, by compor r dinq the offence in lerms of compromise. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing .l e [Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argume nts of Sri Kondadi Ajay Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioner, Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent I o. .1 and of Sri N Srushman Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. a The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT I{YDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 IN AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.16982 of2025 Date:23.12.2o25 Between : Ravula Sai SandeeP @ SandeeP AND The State of Telangana, through SHO, PS Nirmai Town, rePresented bY Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, and another Petitioner/ Accused .. Respondents COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been filed by the pc titioner/ accused seeking to quash the proceedings in FIR. No'650 of 2025 of Nirmal Town Poiice Station, registered for the offences under Sections 78(21, 75(2) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,2023'

2. Heard Mr.K.Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner' Mr.N.Srushman Reddy, Iearned counsel for respondent No'2 and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor' appearing on behalf of respondent No.1-State' 2

3. karned counsel for the petitioner submitt: I that during the pendency of the present Criminal Petition, at the r stance of the well wishers, relatives and.elders, the parties have sc tlecl the disputes pending between them and entered into compronr se and filed Joint Memo. Accordingly, the parties have liled I.A.NI,:.3 and 4 of 2025 seeking permission to compromise the matter e nd to record the compromise rcspectively.

4. This Court uide order, dated 17.12.2025, tl rected the parties i.e ., the petitioner and respondent No.2, to app( z r before the High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, o t 20.12-2025- [n compliance of the said order, the Secretary, High tl ,urt Legal Services Committee, has submitted report, dated 20. 12.202;, stating that the petitioner and respondent No.2 were duly identif ed with copies of their Aadhar Cards/Pan Card. It is further state i that the parties have willfully and without any coercion entered intr ' :ompromise. In view of the said report and also in vierv ,f the compromise 5. entered between the petitioner and respondent ll .2 as rve1l as the submissions made by the respective parties, I.A.N< s.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the proceedings in FIII No 650 of 2025 of Nirmal Town Police Station, are hereby quashed agl nst the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowecl. ubject to payment of costs of Rs.10,OO0/ (Rupees ten thousand onh ) to the High Court -t Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, and Rs'5,0O0/- (Rupees hve thousand only) to the Telangana High court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, by the petitioner, on or before 09.OI '2026' Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall sland closed SD/- A.V,S. PRASAD DEPUTY REGISTRAR Z* SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, '1 . The Station House Officer, Nirmal Town Police Station, Nirmal District 2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

3. One CC to Sri Kondadi A;ay Kumar, Advocate IOPUC] 4. One CC to Sri N. Srushman Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 5 Two CD Copies (Along with a copy of Joint Memo) VH/PSL NOTE: Total Amount of Rs. 15,0001 ( Rupees Fifteen thousand only ) has been paid by Sri Kondadi Ajay Kumar, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 23.12.2025 as Rs. '10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) to the High Court Legal Services Committee, Rs. 5,0001 (Rupees Five thousand only) to The Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 153022 of 2025, Receipt No. 053, dated 31-12-2025. a HIGH COURT DATED: 2311212025 COMMON ORDER l.A. NO: 3 AND 4 OF 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.16982 of 2025 ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION q - -a=:=-:=. 4: '. :y,l l tr,i ,/.. ,A i/j' (1" \-z; '\] J- r 1 .,;r,ar..,f) :=-_--_:1r-- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TEI.ANGANA AT HYDERABAD I.A.NO. CRL.P.No. oF 2025 oF 2025 BETWEEN: Kulakarni Ananya D/o.Kulakarni Anil Kumar, Aged about 27 years, Occ: Student, R io. H. No. 1-3- 15 5 I 77 I 20 / l, Dattatreya Nagar, Nirmal, Dist. Nirmal. ...Petitioner/Respondent/Defacto Complainant AND 1) The State ofTelangana through SHO PS Nirmal Town, Rep by Public Prosecutor High Court for the State of Telangana. ...Respondent/Complainant 2) Ravula Sai Sandeep @ Sandeep S/o.Srinivas, Aged about 28 years, Occ:Student, R/o.H.No.3-40714-15, Hi-Tech City, Road No.7, Mancherial, Dist. Mancherial. ...Respondents/Petitioner/Accused. ,OINT MEMO May it please your lordship,

1. It is to submit that the allegation of the complaint is that on 22-tL-2025 the petitioner herein lodged a written complaint stating that during the year 2019 she studied in an Institution at Hyderabad and one Sandeep got introduced to her and they became friends and they took some photographs together, thereafter in the year 2022 she got married and at present she has one -child aged about 5 months, about one week ago the said Sandeep called her from his Phone No.B4640DOC(9, and sent whatsapp messages from Cell No.85229)O0OC(, demanding that she has to spent 3 nights with him otherwise he would morph the photographs taken during education and post the same in social t media, she further stated that on 20-11-2025 at et out 1150 hours the said Sandeep called her, but she did not ans\li :r the said call, she stated that the said Sandeep harassing her lentally stating that he wili sent the said photographs to her fami I members and calling her and sending messages to her rhone number 95505)COOC( and requested to take action ag ainst the said Sandeep. 2 It is submifted that the Respondent No.1 rer; ;tered.a case in Cr.No.650/2025, dated 22.1L.2025 against the tl:spondent No.2 herein for Offences Punishable under Section 78 (2), 75 (2), 351 (2) of BNS.

3. I submit that the intenrention of the well wis rers and elders of the both parties settled the matter amicably o rt of the court. That due to the said reasons, I came forward t I withdraw the complaint for which I have also executed an Affida' lt stating that I am ready to withdmw the above said case.

4. It is submitted that the matter is settled olr of the cout, I am ready to withdraw the case against the petitior ers considering all the above circumstances this Hon'ble Court mrl ' be pleased to record the compromlse in FiR No.650 of 2025, datt:r 22.11.2025 on the file of SHO PS Nirmal Town, otherwise the pe :itioner and his familli members will suffer irreparable loss. It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Cour: nay be pleased to record the compromise statement and quash ttrr FIR No'650 of 2025, dated 22.11.2025 on the file of SHO PS Nirrr rl Town, in the interest ofjustice and pass such other order or orde s may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. a