✦ High Court of India · 16 Dec 2025

SRl. B v. APARNA LAKSHMI

Case Details High Court of India · 16 Dec 2025

Firm, viz., All Winner, Kiladi, Clean, D-Spot, Smuth. Rakshak. Cure.. Captain, Chess, D-Root Cure, Hi- Growth, Hi-Flower, D-Diamand. Success_ Smkar, Chalenge, Excele, Change, Radey, Patel D-Bullet, Symar, D-Bullet, Symar, D- King, D-Race, Goldwing, D-Don D-Legend, Excelent and CMS which are not covered under the provisions of the lnsecticides Act. 1968 and the Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985 and not prescribed the Standards in Schedule-Vl Fertilizer (Control) Order,1985 by issuing lVemo No. PP.ll(1) 2O8512OO5, dated 211O112006 and Letter No. PP.ll(1)2085/2005. daLed 2110112006.an,1 in the absence of notification prescribing the standards in schedule-V1. as L t ing illegal, arbitrary, u nconstitutiona l, and direct the 2nd respondent not to nterfere within any manner in selling and distribution of bio-products bic- stin r lants including from the licensed premises of the dealers stockists under the lr ;ecticides Act, 196g and the Fertilizers Control(Order)Act. 1985. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 15i cpc praying that in the c rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cor r may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere with manufacturin, , sale ., All Winner, Kiladi, Clean, D-Spot, Smuth, Rakshak, Cure, Captain, Chr:r s, D-Root Cure, Hi_ GroMh, Hi-Flower, D-Diamand, Success, Spykar, Chalen;:, Excele, Change, Radey, Patel D-Bullet, Symar, D-Bullet, Symar, D-King, D- ?ace, Gpldwing, D_ Don D-Legend, Excelent and cMS which are not covered urr er the provisions of the lnsecticides Act, 1968 and the Fertilizer (Control) Order, . 985. Counsel for the Petitioner :SRl. B. V. APARNA LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR AGRICULTURE The Court made the following: ORDER I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT TTYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADIIAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION No.38592 OF 2o25 DATE: L6.12.2O25 Between: M/s.Deenova Agri Care The State of Telangana & another AND ORDER: ...Petitioner ,..Respondents This Writ Petition is hled for the follou'ing relief:- "..-...to issue a Wit. Order or D[rectrcn ntore particu[arlg one in the nature of Writ of Mondomus declaring the oction of the 2'd Respondent in interfering with monufocturing sole ond distnbution of bioproducts/bio stimulonts oJ petitioner Firm viz All Winner, Ktlodi Cleon, D-Spot, Smuth Rokshok, cure, Coptoin, Chess, D'Root, Cure, Hi'Gtowth, Hi-Flower, D' Didmdnd, Success, Spykor, Cholenge, Excele, Change, Rodey, Pdtel, D-Bullet, \ymar, D-Butiet, Syr,-,ct, D-King, D-Roce, Go!dwing, D-Dcn, D-Legend, Excelent ond CMS which ore not covered under the provisions cf the lnsecticides Act 1968 ond the Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985 ond not prescribed the Stondords in Schedule-Vl Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985 by issuing Memo No.PP.lt(1)2085-2005, doted 21./01/2006 ond Letter. No-PP (tt)2085/2005, doted 21/01/2006 ond in the dbsence of notilicotion prescribinq the stondords L K.g$, -G TM D/.j wP la59?_2015 2 in Schedule-Vl, os beinq iltegol, drbitrory unconstitutionol ond cit :ct the 2"d respondent not to interfere within ony manner in selling ond die .ibution of bio products/bio-stimulonts including from the licensed prerri: ?s of the deolers/stockists under the tnsecticides Act,1968 ond the Fertiltz rs Control (Order) Act 1985 and pass....."

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner , rd learned Government Pleader for Agriculture appearing on I ehalf of the respondents. Perused the material available on recc rd.

3. It is submittecl by the learned counsel for t I e petitioner that the subject matter of this writ petition is squ a by the common order of this Court dated I () -ely covered )7.2015 in W.P.No.25293 of 2Ol4 and batch, as modified by he Division Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos. ll22 and 1136 of 1016, dated

03. 1 1.2016. Further, this Court, while disposing I 'W.P.No.4B of 2O2l and batch uide cornmon order dated 07.09 2021, l:.eld as under: " 1 1. In weut thereof. the Writ petitijns are d.isposed o,., tibertA to the pe.titiotrer s to make appltcations in comptianc. requiremert of Clause 5 of the order of the Gouemment of Ind,c ,Mo.S-O.882 (E). clate,d 23.O3.2O21, uithin ttuo (O2) weeks Jrot.t of receipt of copg ol.this ord.er. If such applications are mqde t, time stipulated dboue. tle competent authoitg shall process I granttng utith the beanng tlrc date ithin the 'Le, same TMD,] wP 3A592 10?5 and if sqtisfied, to issue prouisional Certificote of Regstration tn Fonn G- 3, utithin four (4) ueeks thereafier. It is made clear that the competent outhoritl1 is entitted to coLlect 12. samples tn compliance of Part C of the orcle-r dated 23.O2.2O21 and test the compatibilitu of the products meeting the parameters to be marketed 2 as bio-tutients, before granting tlrc proutsional Certificate of 'Regbtration. lt is in the pubtic interest to ensure thQt a Pro'luct to be produced and mqrketed qs a bio-nutient t'ith the object of helpinq the fe.nner to deuetop high cellulose anci resistance Power in the plants meets tte parameters to quolifu as a bio-nutient The petitioners shall co-operate in drau.ting the sqmples. Until the exercise as directed aboue' is completed, subject of course to petitioners submltting apPlicatons within the time stipulated aboue aruf irt contltliance of requiremertts of Clause 5 of the order d.ated 23-O2.2021 of the ('iouernment of Indio" petitioners are entitled to manufachlre and distibuttt as contemplated bg Clause 4 of the order dated 23.O2-2027 HoLueuer' it is aluags open to the competent autlloitg to uerifg whether tlLe products monufctctured cjnd distibuted bg the petitioners are in cornpliance with tlte stalutory reEirements and tqke aclion os Loaftanted bU lalL' '' In terms of the aforestated orders and for the reasons 4. mentioned therein, this Writ Petition is aiso disposed of' There shall be no order as to costs- Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/.A. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /l"/ (r4 SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Co-operation Dept., State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner and Director Of Agriculture, State of Telangana, Opp L.B.Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad, Telangana State. 3. One CC to SRl. B. V. APARNA LAKSH|V|, Advocate tOpUCl

4. Two CCs to GP FOR AGRICULTURE , High Court for tlr r State of Telangana at Hyderabad . [OUT]

5. Two CD Copies DAN BS w E_-: &*r- ---] t - -'-- --- __:-- /,/ - '.1) l. J i,'\ r;. -.\ oi":,. 6 I t '3CEIP5 .-.-.S r, ^.1 ;,.r;,.r.1;i' -:i-:-:-=.i,- HIGH COURT DATED:1611212025 \ \ ORDER l. O WP.No.38592 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS a 65pt4 W 6{\6r

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments