The High Court · 2025

2. Sri C Madhusudhan Yadav, S/o C Gopal Yadav aged about 50 years, Occ: Business, Rl/o Flat No 108 - A, Aditya Sunshine, Khanamet, Kondapur Hyderabad AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONERS The District Collector, Sangareddy, Sangareddy District. 2 3. The Revenue Divisional Office cum Maintenance Tribunal, Sangareddy, Sangareddy Dishict.

4. C. Rajeshwar Yadav, Late Cirimalla Gopal Yadav, aged about 55 years Rl/o H.No. 4-7-2312131211 18, Bypass Road, Sangareddy District.

5. S. Rajeshwari, Wo Jangaih, aged about 53 years, FUo H.No. 4-7-231213121118, Bypass Road, Sangareddy District.

6. Vani, Wo B. Sudheer, aged about 43 years, R:/o H.No. 4-7-231213121118, Bypass Road, Sangareddy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particulbily one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No. 3 in not disposing on the Application filed under section rule 4(1) of the Telangana state Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Vide Application No. 4869 of 2024 ,r. illegal, Arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2OOl and consequently direct the respondent no.3 to dispose of the Application fited by the petitioner no.1 under section rule 4(1) of the Telangana state Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Vide Application No. 4g69 of 2024 forthwith. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no.3 to dispose of the Application filed by the petitioner no.1 under section rule 4(1) of the Telangana state Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Vide Application No. 4869 of 2024 forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI S. SRTDHAR Counsel for the Respondents No.l to 3: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE REPRESENTING GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.4 to 6: .. The Court made the following: ORDER L IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT ITYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.38439 of 2O2S Dated: 15. 12.20.2s Setween: Cirimalla Bharathi and another ... petitioners And The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary and five others ... Respondents ORDER This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- "... to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in not disposing on the Application frled under section rule 4(1) of the Telangana state Maintenance & welfare of Parents and senior citizens Vide Application No. 4869 of 2024 as illegal, Arbitrary and contrary to the Provisions of the Maintenance and werfare of parents and senior citizens Act, 2oor and consequently direct the respondent no.3 to dispose off the Application filed by the petitioner no.l under section rule 4(1)'of the Telangana state Maintenance & welfare of Parents and senior citizens vide Application No.4869 of 2024 forthwith and pass such other order or orders..."

2. Heard Mr.S.Sridhar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.L.Rgvinder, learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue representing learned Government pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.l to 3. Perused the record. i t 2 3 No.1 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner is a senior citl/en and petitioner No.2 is the son "t petitioner No.l. on 26.02.2024, petitioner No.l registered a complaint against her sons, before respondent No.3 under Rute a(1) of the Telangana state Maintenance & welfare of parents and Senior citizens Rules, 2oLr (for short, "the Rules") requesting to take action against them for occupying her land forcibly and depriving of her varuabre right over subject property. The said complaint was taken on file vide Application No.4g69 of 2024. Even after a lapse of the time limit prescribed under the Rules i.e., ninety (90) days, no action has been taken by respondent No.3 so far. Therefore, he seeks to pass appropriate orders

4. Learned Assistant Government preader for Revenue contends that the case of the petitioners is under consideration and appropriate orders would be passed in due course of time, by issuing notices to concerned parties and affording them sufficient opportunity of hearing. Therefore, he seeks to dismiss the Writ Petition.

5. Having regard ]to the submissions of both the rearned counsel and on perusal of the material available on record, .li' :.1.!, 3 since, the relief sought for in this Writ Petition is innocuous in nature, this Court without making any observations on the merits or demerits of the case, deems it appropriate to direct respondent No.3 to examine the application No.4B69 of 2024 submitted by petitioner No.1 and pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of ninety (90) working days from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, by'putting the interested parties including unofficial respondent Nos.4 to 6 on notice and affording them sufficient opportunity of hearing. Since, notice is directed on unofficial responderrt Nos.4 to 6 further service of notice on unofficial respondent Nos.4 to 6 stands dispensed with.

6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ,,TRUE COPY'/ e SD'- K.MADHAVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Sangareddy, Sangareddy District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Office cum Maintenance Tribunal, Sangareddy, Sangareddy District.

4. One CC to SRI S. SRIDHAR, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Tetangana at Hyderabad.IOUTJ

6. Two CD Copies tqlW "f HIGH COURT DATED i1511212025 .,....:, i::-'. ;3 7-^ 4t fi\ i- { :1. 30 .t-. \9. * i',t i Ci ti ti ORDER WP.No.38439 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION 6 WITHOUT GOSTS 7/