_C, Qlqn_deeshwari v. '1 . The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not releasing the retiremenUpensionary benefits such as (1) Gratuity (AP), Telangana, (2) Commuted Value Pension (AP) and Telangana (3) Group lnsurance Principal and lnterest (4) General Provident Funds (GPF), (5) Final Earned Leave Encashment (6) Revised pay scale (RPS) 2020 (PRC Monetary Benefits Arrears) instalment-1- 12, (7) Dearness Allowance (DA) 1't lnstalment to Sth lnstalment G.O.Ms.No.78 at 26.290/o 30.02%, (B) FTA and (9) Surrender Leave of the petitioner is illegal arbitrary, unfair, unjust, discrimination, apart from violation of all the statutory 7 Rules Constitutional provisions and consequently direct t le respondents to release and pay the said pensionary benefits with interest at 1 l% per annum from date of retirement to till the date of actual payment is made. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the cir I rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ma'/ be pleased to direct the respondents to release the (1) Gratuity (AP), Telangana, ( 2) Commuted Value Pension (AP) and Telangana (3) Group lnsurance Princip al and lnterest (4) General Provident Funds (GPF), (5) Final Earned Leave Enc; shment (6) Revised pay scale (RPS) 2020 (PRC Monetary Benefits Arrears) nstalment-1-12, (7) Dearness Allowance (DA) 1"t lnstalment to Sth lnstalment G.l.Ms No.7B @ 26.29 % 30.02%, (8) FTA and (9) Surrender Leave to the petitioner f, ,rthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. D L PANDU Counsel for the Respondent No.'s 1 & 5: GP FOR SERVICE: lll Counsel for the Respondent No's 2,3 & 6: GP FOR SERVICE S I Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: SRl. M. MURALI KRISHI! A SC FOR ACCOUNTANT GENERTl - FZ / /,// IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT T{YDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PT'LLA I(ARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.38398 OF 2o25 DATE: 1a,12.2O25 Between: C. Chandeeshwari. The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Finance DePartment, Dr. B. R.Ambedkar Secretariat, Hyderabad and 5 others. o RDER: ..,Petitioner AND ...Respondents This Writ Petition is frled aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents in releasing retiral benefits to the petitioner.

2. Heard Sri D.L. Pandu, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Govemment Pleader for Services-Ill for respondent Nos.1 and 5, learned Government Pleader for Services-l for respondent 2 Nos.2, 3 and 6 and Sri M. Murali krishna, Standi rg Counsel for Accountaxt General, appearing for respondent Nr.4. With their consent, this writ Petition is taken up for disposal e-r the admission stage itself.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, lear: ed counsel for the petitioner submit t-leat the ris raised in the prest:: rt writ petition has already been adjudicated by the Division Ben<:, r of this Court in W.P.No.23 138 of 2025, which was disposed of ttle order dated O3.O9.2O25, ald thus prayed to pass similar order. in the present Writ Petition also

4. The above made submission is not seriously J.sputed by the other side. 5. Having regard to the above made submissic r s and for the reasons alike in the order dated 03.09.2025 passed ry the Division Bench in W.P. No.23 13g of 2025, the present rArit petition is disposed of directing the respondents to ensure t rat the entire amount payable to the petitioner be released forl I with within a period of slx (06) weeks from today, failing whi, :h, the entire amount with regard to retiral benehts shall carry nterest at the - =,;-E"ffi-:= ---:-- :*,::!-- -.- To, \ 3 rate of 10% per annum from the date the amount fell due tilr it is actually paid. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ petition shall stald closed. There shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// /.MOMINA MEHAR ANT REGIS CTION OFFICER

1. The State ofTelangana, Rep. b Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Secretariat, v Hyderabad 2. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, l\uledical and Health Family Welfare Department Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Secretariat, Hyderabad. its Principal Secretary, Finance Department

3. The Director of Public Health and Family Welfare, Telangana State, Hyderabad.

4. Office of the Principal Accountant General, A and E, Telangana, Hyderabad 5. The Deputy Director/DTO, District Treasury Office, Vikarabad District, Telangana State

6. The District Medical and Health Officer, Sangareddy District At Sangareddy, Telangana State

7. One CC to SRl. D L PANDU Advocate [OPUC] B. One CC to SRl. M. MURALI KRISHNA SC FOR ACCOUNTANT GENERAL Advocate TOPUCI

9. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES-I|| ,High Court for the State of Telangana. louTl

10.Two CCsto GP FOR SERVICES-I,High Courtforthe State of Telangana. '1 '1 .Two CD Copies l'.,:. u IA o,(\ 2 4 sEt zui ( :z Z. I ,t- F . I '.: 'rr".r'lPl-- -. :/' ^ l':' ... r/ HIGH COURT DATED:.1811212025 '3. .,.?. ..t ORDER WP.No.38398 ol 2025 WRIT PETITION IS DISPOSED OF WITH OUT COST ( \