Hyderabad High Court · 2025

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argumentJof Sri pasham Mohith Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional public Prosecutor on rehalf of Respondent No.1 and of Sri P Rajagopal Reddy, Advocate for the Rpsponrlent No.2. The Court macle the following: COMMON ORDER ,,/' .) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2o.25 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No. L6697 of 2O2S Date: 23.L2.2O25 Between : G.S.Prakash AND The State of Telangana, represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, and another ... Petitioner/ Sole Accused Respondents COMMON ORDER: . This Criminal Petition has been filed by the petitioner/accused seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C. No.10388 of 2O2O on the file of the XII Additional Chief Judicial ' Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad. 2- Heard Mr.Pasham Mohit Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.P.Rajagopal Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of respondent No.1-State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during the pendency -of the- present Crim inal .Petitiog at^the-instance of the. xrell .L / I : ? wishers', relatives and elders, the parties have settled the disputes pendinll between them and entered into compromise and filed Joint Memo. Accordingly, the pzrrties have filed I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 seeking permission to compound the offences and to record the compromise respectively.

4. This Court uide order, dated 15.12.2025, directed the parties i.e., the: petitioner and respondent No.2, to appear before the High Court l,egal Services Committee, I{yderabad, on 22.12.2025. [n compliance of the said order, the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has submitted report, dated 17.12.2025, stating that the petition,:r and respondent No.2 were duly identified with copies of their Aadhar Cards/Driving license. It is further stated that the parties have willfully iind without an.y coercion entered into comprornlse.

5. In view of the said report and also in view of the compromise entered between the petitioner and respondent No.2 as well as the submissions made by the respective parties, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allovied. Consequentlv, the proceedings in C.C. No.10388 of 2020 on the file of the XII Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, are hereby quashed against the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed, subject to payment of costs cf Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) to the High Court , a J Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, and Rs.S,OOO/- (Rupees five thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, by the petitioner, on or before O9.01 .2026. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any-, shall stand closed. SD/- AHMED ABDULLA KHAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To, ry-

1. The Xll Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, at Na 2. The Station House Officer, CCS Police Station, Hyde 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT)

4. One CC to Sri Pasham l\4ohith Reddy , Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri P Rajagopal Reddy Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD'Copies ADK/PSL Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise Note: Total Amount of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen thousand only ) has been paid by Sri Pasham Mohith Reddy, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 23-12-2025 as Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) to the "High court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad" and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad" and filed Memo as proof of compliance vide USR No. 3798 of 2O26 dated 09-01-2026. HIGH CC)URT DATED; 23112t2025 I ( COMMOhI ORDER l.A.Nos .2 and 3 of 2025 ln/and CRLP.No.16697 of 2025 -s. $-J 1 6 rtB 2026 L) * ALLOWING THE CRLP AND lA,NOs.2 & 3 OF 202s 1 v , I ^,I MEMORANDT]M OF CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION --- (tINDER SECTION 359 r/w. sECTroN w o*r:N.ssy , L6'k) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA I i l 1 .l l,| :,i ,l ,l :I i i i ,] CrLP. MP No. OF 2025 CRL.P. No. oF 2025 In ,BETWEEN: G.S. Prakash, .. Slo Late Parushuram, Age : 62 years,Occ: Business R/o Plot No. l3 1, Nav Nirman Nagar, Road No. 7l , Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 033. ... Petitioner / Sole Accused AND

1. The State of Telangana rep by its Pubtic prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad :l: - . r,. . Madnasi Mullapudi, Wo. Ramamohan Rao, Age: Tl yrs, Occ: Household R/o- sy. No. 10ll (p), villa No. 26, Surya Icon gated communiry villas, opp, Global International School Feerzadiguaa, uppal - 500039. .. . Respondent/De-Facto Complainant " i:'i i'.i i"., ': :,, For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to compound the offences and quash the C? 4 : : i I i I I,l I I I ,, , n chargesheet in C.C. 10388 of 2O20 on the file of Hon'ble XII Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate, al Nampally and pass such further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may der:m fit and proper in the circumstances of the Case. fvUOwrw,A; rulq^^J (De- facto Conrplai nant/Respondent No.8) Q -:s' (Petitioner/Accused) TPY-ov'a7 (Counsel for the De-facto Complainant/ 2"d Respondent) ? ./.noLn (Counsel for the Petitioners i Accused) Dated: (tl tu,t'4--'