✦ High Court of India · 31 Jan 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 31 Jan 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
31 Jan 2025
Length
1,103 words

1. N. Uma Rani, Wo.Late N Srinivas Reddy aged ' 40 years' bcc House Wife' 2. N. Naveen Reddy, S/o'Late N Srinivas Reddy aged ' 23 Yeats' Occ - Student' 3.N.Priyanka,D/o.LateN.SrinivasReddy'aged.21yea$,occ.Nil. 4. N. Susheela, Wo Late N' Kanna Reddy aged ' 70 years' Occ Nil' All are R/o. Plot No 26, 11-1-113'Kamala Nagar' Dilsuk nagar' Hyderabad' RESPONDENT NO.'t TO 4/CLAIM PETITIONER ' [ii5l]11i#,d,S,r:i:"T,[1Ti,'A3]t'i,511"]#e:l;'l[?3';3?t"''"'"'J1""' KukatPallY, HYderabad' ...RESPONDENT NO.s/RESPONDEN NO'1 Counsel for the Appellants: SRI' KATTA LAXMI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: JUDGMENT ,atb, ,ti''' / ,. a:- -: - i.r. l THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA M.A.C.M.A.No. 2 573 of 2Ot9 JUDGMENT The r,:cord is disclosing that on 14.12.2024, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties beforrr the Lok Ada]at, High court Legal Services committee for th. state of Telangana arr cl accordingty, an award was passed. In vielr. of this position, the appeal is dispos;ed of in terms of the zrs.ard passed by the Lok Adalat. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pendinll if any, shall stand closec1. Sd/- V. HARI PRASAD ASSISSTANT REGISTRAR tt,] //TRUE COPY// \ o 1 2 1 SECTION OFFICER The Chairman Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal cum lll Additic,nal Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. (Enclosed a copy of Award passed by Lok Adalat) One CC to SRt. KATTA LAXMI PRASAD, Advocate [OPUCJ Two CD Copies o I a. ,, r':,..:s1-j.nr*:,*:..,r rr1'y!1'_ _t . i -:- . {' Ct ff.-9 €i-,?t HIGH COURT DATED: 31101t2025 t\, $ tr'-.: !i:t JUDGMENT MACMA.No.2S73 of 20,t9 ,FFq:--- 1t{E 9r4 14: 1l Ars ?g?5 6 ^ DISPOSED OFF MACMA .d- tlj'' a -'.d - i- f\ +q BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMAAITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. [Unde] Seclion l9 of lhe Legol Servlces Aulhoriliei Acl, I ?67 (Cenlrql Acl)l eAL SEn 3 * HIGH CCURT t0i{ AOAIJE-i * '.ltr+ sr6ie cl1 Dat eil4-12-2024 Present:l.HonlbleMrs.Justice S.Nanda, .' (Jdt ge, H6n'ble High court for the state of Telangana) Chairman

2.Sri K.Venkatesh GuPta, Advocate, Member

3.Sri 5rinivasa Srikanth, Advocate, Member rtl.A.c.M.A.No.2 573 of 2O19 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST O.P. No.2i 17 of 2012 (on the fite of the lll Additionat Chief Judge, City Civit Court, Hyderabad) Between:- Bharati N(A Genera[ lnsurance Co.Ltd., Rep. Bv its Manager, 3'd Floor, Gokul Towers, o-i-ooo t e t o, Panjagutta, Hyderabad. e-.'.-,1 AND ... ApPettant/ ...Respondent No.2

1. N.Uma Rani, W/o. Late N.Si-inivas Reddy, aged 40 Years, Occ: House Wife.

2. N.Naveen Reddy, 5/o. N.Srinivas Reddy, . aged: 23 Years, Occ: Student. :. n.friyanka, D/o. Late N.Srinivas Reddy, 4. N.Susheeta, W/o. Late N.Kanna Reddy, aged 21 Years, Occ: Nit. aged: 70 years, Occ: Ni[. Att are R/o. Ptot No.26, 11-1'113, Kamata Nagar, Ditsuknagar, Hydeiabad' ...Respondent No.1 to 4/ ...Ctaim Petitioner. Counset for Appettant/ Respondent No.2/ lnsurance ComPanY : Sri P.V.Shiva Kumar, Advocate Representative of lnsurance Company CounseI for Ctaim Petitioners : Sri Mohammed Abdul Shabeer, Senior Manageir- LegaI Ctaims : Sri C.Vikram Chandra, Advocate/ Sri Vemtat Ramutu D, Advocate ThisappeathavingbeenreferredforsetttementbeforethisLokAdatatandafter hearingtheLearnedCounse[forthepartiesandalsotheparties,,thefollowingawardis passed: ,.,\ -j ',1? - ,,t'!-'t / {-'-'--.I Lt* AWARD \ Compensation AwardeZ by the Tribunat Compensation Awarded (Setttement ReacherJ r in the Lok Adatat. The petition is attow ed with costs awarding a compensaAic Rs.24,62,192/ - (Rupees Twenty_four takhs sixty_two t hundred.and ninety-two only) with inter(.st @ 7 .5% per the date of the petition tiU the reatisatior,. This is an appeal fited by the Appett ant/insurance Com pany against the Award passed by the lil Additionat Chief Judge, City Civit Couri, Hyderabad in 0.p.No.2317 of 2012. housan J annum from The Appettant/Ctaimant atong with their <.ounsel and Sri Mohammed Abdu[ Shabeer, Senior Manager _ Legat (taims for the Respondent No.2-lnsurance Cornpany are present. Dr.rring the pendenry of this appeat, the Appettant/Ctaimant as wet[ as Respondent/lnsurance company has entered into a setttement anc in pursuance of the same, the Appettant/Ctaimant has agreed to receive an amount of Rs'22,00,000/- (Rupees twenty-two rakhs ornry) towards futt and finat settlement in lumpsum in addition to the ;tmount atready deposited and the lnsurance Company has agreed to p,ry the same. Accordingty, compromise is reccrded and the case is set ed before the Lok Adatat. ln view of the setttemerit, this A4AClvlA No.2573 of 20,19 is disposed of directing the Insurance company to pay the above said amount within a period of one (1) Month from the date of receipt of copy of this award, after deducting the amount that was deposited, if any. ln the event of default or detay in making of such deposit, the Ctaimant/petitioner is entitted to claim interest as awarded by the Tribunat. The apportionment among the Respond,lnt Nos.1 to 4/Ctaim Petitioner shatt be made as per the terms of the award passed in M.V.O.P.No.2317 of ZO12 by the Tribunat: r'.-lj SER o o H L * 7 th" Diai9 5r Apportionment of Compensation, if any Addition al Direct ion(s): 1. The Appettant is entitted to the refund of Court Fee paid in this appeat. 2' The amount atready deposited by the rnsurance company if any, shatt be given credit to. 3' Soon after deposit bv the Insurance company, the Respondent Ncrs. 1 to 4/ctaim Petitioner are permitred to withdraw *r"ii iirp".t*e share amounts as per the apportionment to be made by the Tribunai ln token of consent for the above settlement and award, the parties ;rnd their counse[ have signed this award in our presence Interms of the compronrise arrived at between the parties, this case stands disposed of. \^oz,-D- t:"y 6'f''-/ i e' 'flsl'::i rrattr:,,..|,'?!\i,$:.r.;1,,- ..,, --.;;...' -, q Na. t-zrTlte_ 1t I Appettant (s) Respcndent (s) tsYl }ht Gfilif;PAL INSURATICE o E CCCE illr * ** { ) t. l\l 'Urnp.sra-"u" 1t r@-+ 3- w*Y q .J tu D4\be s:.'i Counsel for the Appeltant (s) -1^s qqo lqc { ,"I' P Counsel for the Respondent (s) {J -.f" ,l*)^ CHAIRi4AN ER Vv-n-- EMBER M o ! * o. GAL l-. cl T Iee) ,t'i'' ./ I t- ' _r:;.'.lil

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments