Ch. Venkata Ramanaiah v. The Registrar (Admn.)
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 07 Oct 2004
- Bench
- C V RAMULU
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.13341 of 2002 Between: Ch. Venkata Ramanaiah, S/o. Venkatesh R/o. 26-1-1506, 13 Cross Road, Chandra Mouli Nagar, Vedayapalem, Nellore-IV, Nellore District. AND ..... PETITIONER
The Registrar (Admn.), High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
The District and Sessions Judge, Nellore, Nellore District.
D.V. Chelapathi Rao, District Court, Nellore .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, call for the records in Proceedings R.C.A.No.168/2002, dt: 22-6-2002 of the 2nd respondent and quash the same. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.J.SATYA PRASAD Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Smt.M.BHASKARA LAKSHMI, SC FOR APHC. Counsel for Respondent No.3 : None appeared. The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice) As per the note of the Registry, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he would like to have instructions. We will close the writ petition as infructuous with liberty reserved to the petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings if fresh cause of action arises. _____________________ (DEVINDER GUPTA, C.J.) 7th October 2004. __________________ (C.V.RAMULU, J.) ARS To
1. The Registrar (Admn.), High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2. The District and Sessions Judge, Nellore, Nellore District. 3. Two C.Cs. to Mrs. M.Bhaskara Lakshmi, S.C. for High Court, High Court Bldgs., Hyderabad (OUT).
Two C.D. copies.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 07 Oct 2004. The bench was C V RAMULU.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.