The High Court · 2025

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of for the State of Telangana, At HYderabad

2. Mamunoori Kiran, Sio Sambaiah Aged Laxmipuram Village, Duggondi Mandal Warangal District RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT 36 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO.2 petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum o[ Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to call for the records relating to S.S.C, No. 469 of 2023 in the court of ll Addl- District Judge cum Special Court for SC, ST (POA) Act cases' At Warangal and Quash same against the petitioners /Acc I ed Nos and 9 1,2. 4, 5,6. 8 l.A. NO: 1OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying tlr, t in the circumstancers stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petr r ,n, the High court may be pleased to Stay of all further proceedings inclurt rg appearance of the Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5,6, 8 and 9 in S.S.C No. 469 of 2023 in the court of ll Addl. District Judge cum special court for sc ;T (poA) Act cases, At Warangal pending disposal of the Criminal petition l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Between: It/amunoori Kiran, S/o Sambaiah Aged 36 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o Laxmipuram Village, Duggondi Mandal Warangal [iistrrct ..,PETITIONI R/RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 2 3 1 Pandavula Surender, S/o Sarangam Aged about 4 t R/o Laxmrpuram village, Duggondi trrtand'at, Warangat Pandavula Ramarai, S/o Sarangam Aged about 4: R/o I axmipuram village, Duggon-cli Manial, Warangat Keesari [Jhaskar, S/o Swamv. Aqed 34 vears I axmipuram village, Duggondi Manda-|, Warang'al drs r landavula Mahesh, S/o Veeraswamy Aged about 3 j R/o Laxmipuram village, Duggondi Mind"at, Waranga Pandavula Shiva Kumar, S/o Kommalu Aged about 3: R/o Laxmipuram village, Duggondi Mandaj, Waranga Pandavula Raju, S/o Sambaiah Aoed 36 vear: I axmrpuram village, Duggondi MandallWaranga'l drslr Keesari Kishan, S/o Swamy Aged 43 years, Occ. Arlr r vrttage. Duggondi Mandal, Warangal districl 4 5

7. t years, Occ Agriculturr-- lrstnct 7ears, Occ Agriculture lrstrrct Occ Agrrculture R/o :t years, Occ. Agriculture rstrict years, Occ, Agriculture 'istrict Occ Agriculture R/o ;t ulture R/o Laxmipuram B ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIC) I|9 Stglg of Telangana, Rep. by its pubtic prosecu r State of Telangana, At Hyderabaij. IERS/A1, 2,4,5,6,8 & I tligh Court of for the RESPO \ )ENT/ RESPONDENT Petition under Section 359 (6) of the BNSS, Re I with 528 of BNSS, prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the Memrrri ldum of Grounds ot criminal Petition. the High court may be preased to p: mit the pelitioner/2nd respondenvDefacto complatnant to compourtd tlre offence Rcgistered against the Respondents/Petitioners/Accused A1 ' 2' 4' 5' 6' 8 and 9 registered against them Under Sections 290, 323, 324' 506 R/S. 149 IPC and g (t) (0(s)' of SC' ST (PoA)Act. in S.S-C. No 166 of 2023 in the court of ll Addl District Judge cum Special Court for SC, ST (POA) Act cases' At Warangal and renumbered as 46gt2o23onthefileofllAddl'DistrictandSessionsJudgeWarangalarisingout of Crime No. 91/2023 on the file of Duggondi P S' Warangal and quash the proceedings against the Respondents/petitioners/accused No A1 ' 2' 4' 5' 6' 8 and t herein in CrlP No of 2O25 t.A. NO :3OF 2O25 Between: Mamunoori Kiran, S/o Sambaiah Aged 36. years Occ: Agriculture R/o UilH& viirigb, Dtlssondi Mandal Waransal District ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 3

1. pandavula surender, S/o sarangam Aged about 41 years' occ: Agriculture ht'U;rrdrari ;iilrg;, Dussondi Mandal warangal district Pandavula Ramarai, S/o Sarangam Aged about 42. y.ea$ ' Occ: Agriculture hzu'iffi;pr;illiirj'jg", ouggonti trlanEat' waransal district KeesariBhaskar,S/oSwamy'Aged.-34years,.occ:AgricultureR/o i;;6;#:riitJs'e Dusgonal naand al' waransal district pandavula Mahesh, S/o Veeraswamy Aged.about 35 years' occ: Agriculture ff;'Uffiiffi;iirrbgt' ousgondr Minoat' warangal drstrict pandavula Shiva Kumar, S/o Kommalu Aged. about s.3,yeqr:, occ: Agriculture Rt'i:l-,"d;ffi ,ilr,gt,'o'gg"ndi Manda-l' warangal district Pandavula Raju, S/o Sambaiah Aged 36 years. occ: Agriculture Rl/o ffiHi;;;;'"';ili;6e. Dussond i ttr a nd al' wa ransal d istricl Keesari Kishan, S/o Swamy Aged 43 years' Occ: Agriculture R'/o Laxmipuram viilage, Duggondi Mandal, Watangal otstrtcr rhe sta te or rera n s a n a, ;:*, : ?::[ li;l i; i;l i'l ,I::::''"']'Tll

5. 7 8 sia-te? tetangana ]At HYder abad RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT Petition unde( Section 359 (2) of the BNSS' praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition ' the High Court may be pleased to record the compromrse in Cr1 P No' of 2025 and quash the proceedings in S.S.C- No. 166 of 2023 in the Judge cum Special Court for SC, ST (FOA) Act cas renumbered as 469/2023 on the file of ll Addl. Distr r Warangal arising out of Crime No. 91/2023 on the file of t a registered against the petitionerslAl,2,4,5, 6, 8 ancl 323.324.506 R/S. 149 IPC and 3 (1) (r)(s), of SC, ST (l)rr :ourt of ll Addl, District :s,. At Warangal and and Sessions Judge rggondi P.S. Warangal I Under Sections 290, ,)Act. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perus r ; the fi/lemorandum of Grounds of Crinrinal Petition and upon hearing the argurr nts of Sn A Prabhakar Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Pros('rutor for the State of Telangana on behalf of the Respondent No.-l and of Sri r\ 'inash Singh, Advocate for the Respondent No 2 The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT T{YDERABAI) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2O25 IN AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.16551 of 2025 Date:24.L2.2O25 Between: Pandavula Surender and six others. . Petitioners/Accused Nos. I , 2, 4, 5,6,8 and 9 AND The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, and another Respondents COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been flled bv thc petitioncrs/ accused Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9 seeking to quash the proceedings in S.C. No.469 of 2023 on the irle o[ the II Additionat District Judge-cum- Special Court for SCs/STs (POA) Act Cases at Warangal.

2. Heard Mr.A.Prabhakar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, through video conference, Mr. Avinash Singh, learned counsel for respondent No.2, and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalfoI respondent No.1- State 1 2

3. Learnr:d counsel for the petitioners submitt .d that during the pendency of the present Criminal petition, at the j rstance of the well wishers, relirtives and erders, the parties have :;, ttled the disputes pending betrvcen them and entered into comprorr sc and filed Joint Compromise Memo. Accordingly, the parties hav<. lled I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 se,:king permission to compound the ofrc rces and to record the comprorn isc respectively.

4. This Court uide order, dated 11.12.2025, (l i.e., the petilioners and respondent No.2, to appt,i Court Legal Sierwices Committee, Hyderabad, on or In complianr e of the said order, the Secretary., Serviccs Committee, has submitted report, dated t that petitionr r Nos.2 to 7 and respondent No.2 v., u.ith copics oi their Aadhar Cards. It is further strr Nos.2 to 7 irncl respondent No.2 have willfullv cocrcion cnter cd into compromise. 'ectcd the parties r bcfore the High cfore 17 . 12 .2025. { igh Court Lega I '.12.2025, staring re duly identifiecl 3(l t hat pctitioner rnd u,ithou t anv

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit r No.l could not be identified on the ground that his l not tallied with the Aadhar Card. He further sr father's namc o[ petitioner Nos.1 and 2 was wrongll, as 'Sarangam instead of mentioning ,sarangapar_ri, final reportT th cir father name is mentioned as .Sara Lhe sworn afficiavit of petitioner No. 1 to that effect. r 1 that petitioner tther's name in as rmittcd that the .pc<l in thc F.l.R. Hor.,r,ever. in the gzrpani'. He filed J

6. Learned counsel for respondent No'2 and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor have not disputed the saine [n view of the report submitted by the Secretary' High Court 7 . trgal Services Committee, Hyderabad' and also in view of the compromise entered between the petitioners and respondent No 2 as well as the submissions made by the respective parties, I'A.Nos.2 and 3ol2025areallowed.Consequently,theproceedingsinS.C.No.469 of 2023 on the hle of the II Additional District Judge-cum-Special court for SCs/STs (POA) Act cases at warangal, arc hereby quashed against the petitioners/Accused Nos l' 2' 4' 5' 6' 8 and 9'

8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petilion is allowed' subject to payment of costs of Rs.10,O0O/- (Rupees ten thousand only) to the High Court Lcgal Services Committee, Hyderabad, and Rs.S,oOo/. (Rupees lrve thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates' Association' Hyderabad, by the petitioners, on or before 09'Ol 2026 ' Miscellaneous applications, pending if any' shall stand closed' SD/. C. DEEPIKA SS STANT REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To cases, At Warangal

1. The ll Additional District Judge cum Special Court for SC, ST (POA) Act 2. The Station House Offic-er, Duggondi Police Station, Warangal District. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High court for the state of Telangana, at 4. One CC to Sri. A prabhakar Rao, Advocate IOPUCI Hyderabad [OUT] One CC to Sri. Avinash Singh, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies pr /PSL Enclosing a coPY of Joint Memo 5 6 W Note \ Total Amount of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen thousand only ) has been paid by Sri A Prabhakar Rao, counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble court vide order dated 24.12.2025 aS RS. 1o,oo0/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) to the., High Court Legal Services Committee Hyderabad, and Rs. 5'000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association' Hyderabad and filedMemoasproofofcomplianceUSRNo.33g3of2o26ondated0Bol-2026 HIGH COURT DATED:24 t12t2O2S I \ COMMON ORDER !,4.-Nor.z AND 3 oF 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.16551 of 2O2S -..--" ::--rt.: :'i o() 1 [ tu il,l.6 * I rl.r,-,,' : f,-':.:., ! I I I I ALLOWING THE CRL.PETITION AND I.,I 'S q 1 I ?u r IN TEE EIGE Cd,ETFOBTHE STATE OF TELANGANA ATEYDERABAD Crl-P.No. )tto Between: Mamunoori Kiran S/o Sambaiah Aeed 36 Years, Occ, Agicutture R,/"o I-ax#purmr litlage, f)rtggondi Maldal Warangal District. of2025 ..Petitioner / .Respondent No.2 And

1. Pandavuta Surender 57s 5'r;igam Aged about 4l years, Occ; Agriculuu-e . . R/"o La:<mipuram village, Dugondi Mandal' Warangal district

2. Pandavula Ramaraj S/o Sarangam Ased aboul 42 Years, Occ; Agricultre rul f-"x-ip,r"am village, Duggondi Mandal' Warangal district

3. Keesari Rhaskar S/o SwamY' Ased 34 Years, Occ: egiculure nio t-*-ip,r*- village, Duggodi Mandal' Warangal district

4. Pandavula Mahesh S/o Veeraswamy Aged about 35 Years, occ; Agriculh:re R/"o Laxmipuram village, Dgggondi Mandal' Warangal district

5. Pandavula Shiva Kumar 576 (6mmalu Ased about 33 Years, Occ; Agriculure Wl I-o-ipu** village Duggondi Mandal' Warangal district t

6. Pandavula Raju S/o Serrfiaiah Aged 36 years, Occ; Agriculnrre y,:_krpry viilaeE Du8:gondi Mandal, warangal district

7. Keesari Kishan S/o Swamv Aged 43 years. Occ: Agiculture Y,:_tlg*1", vt Ua6. oueeondi Mandal, warangal district Petitioners, 8 The State of Telaneana Rep. by its public ilor..rto. High Court of for the State of Telung*q At Hyderabad. JOINTMEMO . Respondents / ^ l, 2, i, 5, 6, g & 9 .. Respondent/ Respondent It is submitted that on the intervention of thr: and relatives and caste elders the disputes betweer sorted out. The elders advise the petitioner/ respon J the criminal case registered against the Resp c Accused A1.2, 4,5, 6, g & 9 and for betterment c I 4, 5, 6, I & 9 and R2 individual life as the Responrl 4,5,6,8 & 9 and tre well wishers setrle the disput3 the respondents/Accused A1,2,4,5, 6, g & 9 and .i their relationship. The peritiouer/defact complainan: well wishers friends hem were amicably :nt not to prosecute rdents/ petitioners/ the Accused Al, 2, 'nts /accused Al, 2, amicable between r the betterment of has no interest to prosecure the above Criminal petitionos/respondents/Accused .Al, 2, 4, 5, 6, I & 9 The said criminal against the procredings may be quashed in the interest ofjustice in Crl.P.No. of 2025 arrd cannot be ckim mything against the p'ititioners/Accused Al, 2,4, 5,6,8 & 9 and firnre . .The defacto complainant/ accordingly/ the ' petitioner,{R2 is agreed not to prosecute the criminal case registered against Respondents/Peftioners/Accused A1,2, 4, 5, 6, I & 9 Under Sections 290,323,324, 506 R/S. 149 IPC and 3 (1) (i)(s), of SC, ST (PoA)Act-as they are settled amicably as the both side conimunity elders It is submiued that the petitioner/2od respondent have amicably seftled the dispute at the intervention of elders and well wishers and friends and caste elders the matrer has been compromised between them' Hence the both parties came to conrpmmise in the abolve Crl.P.No' of 2025 against S.S.C. No. 166 of 2023 n the court of II Addl' District Judge cum Special Court for SC, ST (POA) Act cases,. At Warangal and renumbered as 469/2023 on the file of II Addl. District and Sessions Judge Warangal registered agains the respondents /Accused A1,2, 4, 5, 6, 8 & g Under Sections 290, 323, 324, 506 R/S. 149 IPC and 3 (l) (r)(s), of SC, ST (PoA)Acr and both the parties have no claims or rights h-;.,.]-.-. -.. FT:.;.l-. .:'--- - t qgaing each other in fut*e and &s accrrssd and respondent are lived their, individual life and no aufhority to each o them I , 0. ?-ALE \ 3 fi .b4",*L(flr.- o ? 5a1"i" 5 P. S t\'ttt A oJ Q+v i h. ts4^ nesponae,ntsne#ners/Acc,sed 41,2,4,s,6,8&9 k^^^., Petitioner/ Respond,i t No. 2 Defacto complainant Counsel for 41,2, 4, 5, 6, 8 & 9 oners/Accused c,K)}k- Petitioner/ Reslrr ndent No. 2 Defacto compl: i rant