Gangadari Anil Kumar v. '1 . The State of Telangana

5. Sri. Pittala Praveen Kumar, S/o. Not Now, Age. Major, Occ. Sl of Police, Fl/o. Chinnagudur Police Station, Mahabubabad District.

6. K. Shankaraiah, S/o. Veeraiah, Age. Major, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Chinnagudur Village, Mahabubabad Town and District.

7. Kande Madhavi, Wio. Babu, Aged about 38 year, Occ . Agriculture Rl/o . Chinnaguduru Village and Mandal, Mahabubabad District. ....,RESPONDENTS Petition ,Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an Order, Direction or Writ, more particularly a WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents mor6 particularly respondent No. 2 not taping any action against the Respondent no. 5 to 7 in pursuance to my complaint submitted on 01.08.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to sections 154() A 154(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code 1973, contrary to law laid down by the Honoruable Apex Court in Lalita Kumari vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1 and in u clation of the rights conferred by the constitution of lndia under Articles 14 and 11 and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to register the FIR in pursuance lt petitioner complaint dated 0'1 .08.2025 and take appropriate action under the cr r rinal laW against the unofficial respondents No. 5 to 7. |.A.NO:1 OF 202s Petition Under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the cii the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court mz1 umstances stated in be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to register the FIR in pursuance to petiti{ 01 .O8.2O25 and take appropriate action under the law r respondents No. 5 to 7 pending disposal of the above writ p€t justice. ner complaint dated yainst the unofficial lion in the interest of Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI YADAIAH BODDUPALLY Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 to 7 : - The Court made the following ORDER / 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.37992 of 2o.25, DATE OF ORDDR: LL.L2.2O25 Between: Gangadari Anil Kumar, S/o.Uppataiah. AND ...Petitioner The State ofTelangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad and 6 Others ...Respondents ORDER: Aggrieved by the action of respondent No.2 in not taking any action against respondent Nos.S to T in pursuance to the petitioner's complaint submitted on 01.08.202S, the present writ petition is hled. A consequential prayer is sought to direct respondent No.2 to register the F.LR. in pursuance to the .\ii 2 petitioner's complaint dated 0 1.08 .2025 and take appropriate action under criminal law against the unofficia. respondent Nos.5 to7.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitiot Ler ald learned Assistant Government Pieader for Home appeari tg for respondent Nos. 1 to 4.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner su1 mitted that the petitioner's mother is in possession of agricultr- r al land in Survey No. 18/AA admeasuring Ac.2-30 guntas situate 1 at Chinagudur Village, Mahabubabad District. The same was : :ing cultivated by the petitioner and his family members. It is furtt the respondent No.7 was aliotted an extent l er submitted that ' land in Survey Nos.93/4 and 94/4 admeasuring Ac.0-12 gur tas and Ac.2-28 guntas, respectively. The same was situated on 1 1e eastern side of the petitioner's agricultural 1and. It is further r; rbmitted that the respondent No.7 ald her family members are .( dging complaints against the petitioner and his father for no fault of them, alleging that the petitioner and his family members eno: oached upon the land of respondent No.7. It is further su l mitted that the compromise talks were conducted between the fat rilies of petitioner ./ /1 ) and respondent No.7 before the village elders. It is further submitted that the respondent No.6, who is father-in-law of respondent No.7, who was not present on the days of compromise, lodged a complaint against the petitioner ald his father on

28.05.2025 stating the same allegation. The respondent No.5 without enquiry and without .considering the compromise talks registered a false case. As a counter blast, the petitioner lodged a complaint before respondent No.2 on 01.08.2025 stating that the respondent No.7 arld her family members are lodging false complaints against the petitioner and his father. It is further submitted that neither the petitioner nor his family members have ever encroached upon anyone's land and had not made any such attempt at any point of time. Pursuant to the petitioner's { I complaint dated 01.08.2025, no action or an enquiry is conducted by respondent No.2. Aggrieved by the inaction of respondent No.2, the petitioner is constrained to file this writ petition seeking appropriate directions.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submitted that the complaint lodged by the petitioner on 01.08.2025 would be 4 considered by respondent No.2 ald appropriate action would be taken strictly as per the procedure contemplated , rnder law.

5. Recording the same, the respondent No 2 is directed to consider the petitioner's complaint dated O1.)).2O25 and take appropriate action strictly in accordance with lav.

6. With the above directions, this writ petit:( n is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous a1r'rli621iens if any pending, in this petition, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/ . I.C. SULEKHA DEVI I;TANT REGISTRAR t= \ sEcTloN oFF|CER riat, itate of Telangana The. Principal Secretary, Home Department, S at Hyderabad, T.S. The Superintendent of Police, Mahabubabad ,Ma abubit rad District. The Deputy Superintendent of police , Thorrur, Mahabua t ad District. The Station House Officer, Chinnagudur Police Station, \ ahabubabad District. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of ' elangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] One CC to SRI YADATAH BODDUPALLy, Advocate tOF,t rCI Two CD Copies 1 2 3 5 6 7 To SA LS W / ( I ,tt€ S14 () L) 2 tJAll 2026 HIGH COURT DATED:1111212025 ORDER WP.No.37992 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. 0t