The High Court · 2025

7. Mr. Sanjay l\Ialhotra, S/o. Not Known. Chief Executive Officer, of Mis. EMAAR II4GF Land Ltd., Office Address Emaar [t/]G F Business Park, Mehrauli Gurgaon Road, Sicanderpur Chowk, Sector - 28, Gurgaon - 122OO2, Haryana, India.

8. tt/r. Natini Kanth, S/o. Not Known, Liaison Officer of [vl/s. EtrtlAAR t\ilG F Land Ltd., Office Address Emaar [t4GF Business Park, Mehrauli Gurgaon Road, Sikanderpur Chowk, Sector - 28, Gurgaon - 122002, Haryana, lndia.

9. Mr. Prasad, Chief Security Officer., M/s. EMAAR Ir4GF Land Ltd., Boulder Hills Golf and Country Club. lvlanikon-1 Village, Gachibowli, Hyderabad - 500032, Telangana State. Respondents Unofftcial 5,6,7,8, and 9 Hyderabad Address Hyderabad Address Boulder Hills Golf and Country CIub. lt4anikonda Village, Gachibowli, Hyderabad - 500032, Telangana State. ...RESPONDENTS I I I I I I i I I I I Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constltution of lnd r circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, ;r. the nature of Writ of lv4andamus, declaring the inactio - authorities, particularly 3rd and 4th respondents herein, tr' r petitroners representation dt- 11.11.2016, and not l,r p rotectio n/assista n ce fror.n the 4th respondent Police Statit,r Nos. I and 17, admeasuring of 384 Sq.yards, and 475 Sc. situated in Sy No.27l3, 2813, aI NANAKRAI/GUDA Village, I Circle, Serilingampalli ftlandal, Ranga Reddy district, TS unjust and conseqeuntly direct the respondents herein, forihr protection / assistance in respect of petitioners registere,l admeasuring of 384 sq. Yards, and 475 Sq.Yards, both Sy.No.27l3, 2813, at NANAKRAIVGIDA Village, GHN/C ri Serilimgampalli ltrlandal, Ranga Reddy District, TS, By cor sr praying that in the ligh Court may be : particu larly one in of the respondent yet cons dering the ,vid ing the Police in-respect of Plots ards, both plots are llv4C Serilingampallr rs illegal arbitrary, th provide thepolice plots No 9 and 17. ,ots are situated in rilingampalli Circle, aring the petitioners detailed representation, dt.1 1-1 1-2016. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 52453 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ,rir the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou- directing the respondents 3rd & 4th herein, forthwith protection/assistance from the 4th respondent Police li petitioners registered Plots No's, 9 & 17, admeasuring of i Sq.yards, both plots are situated in Sy. No's. 2713, & 2813, i Village, GHMC Serilingampalli Circle, Serilingampalli [\,4a r r considering the petitioners detailed representation, dt. Jmstances stated in may be pleased to lrovide ihe Police rtion, in-respect of 34 Sq.ya.ds, & 475 NANAKRATVGUDA rl. R,R. District. by 1.11.2016, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI PALLE NAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 4: SRI R.LAXMIKAT'I H REDDY, Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 TO 9: M/s. SHIREEN St: HNA BARIA AGP FOR HO ! t: The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.42537 0F 2016 ORDER This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of lndia seeking the following relief "...to lssue a writ order or direction more pafticularly .one in the natureofWritofMandamusdectaringtheinactionoftheRespondent aii,orities pafticutarty respondenti No'3 and 4 herein not yet cinsidering'the petitioners representation dated 11 11.2016 and not piiiiirg'the police protection/assistance from the 4'' respondent respect of p/ots Nos.9 and 17 admeasuring of 384 Tiitii "irtrr,'in '{qr;;; "r; 475 iq-vards both ptots are situate-d in Sv Nos 27/3 iii ZA|S at Nanakramguda Village, GHMC Serilingampalli Circle' i*,tigiiprtti Mandal, R.R distriat, T S as itlegat, a.rbitrary and to ;;;;"i- ti; respondents herein, fotthwith provide the police p,riiectiontassisiance in respect of petitioners registered plots No 9 '",ii- ii ,a*u""uring of 384 Sq.yards and 475 Sq yards' both plots in SylNos 2T/3 and 28/3 at Nanakramguda Village' Zir" Ani6 S"ritingampalti Circle, Seritingampatti Mandal' R R district' i.S Oy considering the petitioners detailed representation dated 11 .1 1 -i016 and to grant such other order or orders. "'" Heard Mr.Palle Nageshwar Rao, learned counsel for "ituut"a 2 ) petitioners and Mr.R.Laxmikanth Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos'1 to 4'

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that' as the respondents/police failed to act upon the representation dated 11.11.2016 seeking appropriate directions, the present writ petition has been filed. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, however' submits that 4. pursuant to the said representation, Crime No 368 of 2016 was Z registered, and after due investigation, a final rep r 1 was filed on

04.05.2018 before the Court of the XXV Metrop: tan Magistrate, Miyapur, Cyberabad, opining "lack of evidence."

5. ln view of this subsequent development, and str :e the grievance raised in the writ petition has already been a,l ressed by the respondents, the writ petition stands dismissed as rr ructuous There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall star i closed SD/ A. A TI J. GOWRI SHANKAR S I ISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// (..,'* SECTION OFFICER \ To l One CC to SRI PALLE NAGESWAR RAO, Advocate t( lq.ql^- 2. ON; CC tO IT/iS. SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA, AdVOCAIE )PLIC] 5. i;; CCs to GP FoR HotVE, High court for the state c Telangana, at 4. 'Two CD CoPies Hyderabad. [OUT] PSK. nsg\ l I I I I I ! t I I I t i l i I i I i I I I i I I ', i HIGH COURT DATED:21 10812025 5 6 ORDER WP.No.42537 of 2016 :-," -.\ 4.. - I ...-, I 1l <. i.., 1 6 EB 2026 O :, -:l,. .+ DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS u$,2*/...\ / o\ "')