1. Manchikatla Venkataswamy v. The State of Telangana, Rep

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 oI the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly Respondent No.3 authorities in trying to interfere in the possession and demolish the properties of Petitioners bearing H.Nos.19-8-65,286,289' 290' 291,292,293,'135, 136, 137,138, 141 , 142,143, 144,148,',149, 150 and 151, H.Nos. 19-8-265 to 27O (old H.Nos.32-102,103 and104) and H.No.19-7-33, situated in Laxminagar, Godavarikhani, under Ramagundam Municipal Corporation area, Peddapalli District, Peddapalli District, by deceptively showing that the properties of the Petitioners constructed in the y:ars 1979, 1985 and '1986 respectively alleging encroachment of the proposed z 0-00 road which was approved in the year 200 1 as per the Master Plan 'ride G.O-Ms.No.99 dt.1'1.05.2001, as arbitrary, unreasonable, ultra-virus, violrtion of principals of natural justice, violation of lnterim orders passed by this Ho rourable Court in WP Nos. 346 17 of 2025 dt. 13. 1 1.2025 and 34792 of 2025 dt. 4 11.2025 and order passed in WP No. 36744 of 2025 dt. 01 .12.2025, violative o the provisions of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013, violation of the Circutar vide G.O.tvts.243 dt.28.06.2011, MA and UD(J) Department besides violation of Articles 14,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and Consequently, direct the Respon,lent No.3 authorities not to interfere and demolish the properties of the Petitioners bearing H. Nos. I g-8- 65, 286, 289,290,291 ,292, 293,135, 136, 137, 138, 141 , 11.2,143. 144,148, 149, '1 50 and 151, H.Nos. 19-8-265 to 270 (old H.Nos.32-102,'103 and 104) and H.No.19-7-33, situated Laxminagar, Godavarikhani, unrJer Ramagundam Municipal Corporation area, Peddapalti District, without follorving the due process of law as directed by the Honourable Court in Wp Nos 34611 of 2025 dt. 13.11.2025,34792 of 2025 dt.14.11.2025 and Wp No ai6744 of 2O2S dt 01 12.2025. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cirr;umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ma,y' be pleased direct the Respondent No.3 not to interfere in the possessiorr and demolish the properties of the Petitioners bearing H.Nos.19-8-65, 286, ZB9, 290,291 ,292, 293,135,136, 137, 138, 141 ,142,143, 144,148, 149, 1S0 ard 151, H Nos. .19-8- 265 to 27O (old H.Nos.32-102,103 and104) and H.No..l9-7-33, situated Laxminagar, Godavarikhani, under Ramagundam Municipa I Corporation area, Peddapalli District, without following the due process of law, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAVINDER REDDY, Senior Counsel . Counsel for the Respondents No.1 : GP FOR MCPL ADMN LTRBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondents No.2 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.3 : SRI K.SIDDHARTH REE D,y, SC FOR MC The Court made the following: ORDER foT SRI VEERA SAVAN CHAKR/\VARTHY DARA IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETIT toN No.37741 OF 2025 DATE:08-12-2025 Between: Manchikatla VenkataswamY and two others. . . .. Petitioners AND The State of Telangana Rep. by Principal Secretary (MA & UD), Department, Secretariat, HYderabad' Telangana State, and two others. ORDER ... Respondents Heard Mr. Ravinder Reddy, learned Senior Counsel, appearing forMr.VeeraSavanChakravarthyDara,learnedcounselforthe petitioners;Mr.K.SiddharthReddy,learnedStandingCounsel appearing for respondent No.3, and perused the material available on record. t :'

2. Learned Senior Counsel submitted that despite the order of this Court dated 01 J22025 in W P No 36744 of 2025 directing respondent No.3 not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner I 2 I-I' - *-1 therein, who is respondent No.3 herein, without fo lowing due process of law, markings have been made on the propertir:s; of the petitioners and demolition process is being undertaken.

3. Learned Standing Counsel for respondr:nt No.3 produced written instructions and submitted that the orders c,f this court passed in W.P.Nos.34617 of 2025, 34792 of 2O2S anc W.p No.36744 ot 2025 are strictly being folrowed. Notices have rleen issued to the petitioners. That the road-affected portions and en:roachments falling within 40 feet width Master plan road abutting the properties of the petitioners have been identified and marked b,r the Corporation. Notices have been issued from time to time directirg the petitioners to submit the ownership documents, sanctioned building plan etc.

4. However, learned Senior Counsel submitted that the petitioners have not received any notices.

5. Learned Standing Counsel for responrjent No.3 further submitted that appropriate steps wifl be taken stri:fly in accordance with the directions issued by this Court.

6. ln view of the written instructions and un<lertaking given by the learned standing counsel for respondent No.3. this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.3 not to Interfere with the I I f 3 petitioners' possession and not to demolish the petitioners' properties bearing H.Nos. 1 9-8-65, 286, 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 1 35, 1 36, 1 37, 138, 141, 142, 143, 144, 148, 149, 150 & 151, H.Nos.19-8-265 to 270 (old H.Nos.32-1O2, 103 & 104) and H.No. 19-7-33, situated at Laxminagar, Godavarikhani, under Ramagundam Municipal Corporation area, Peddapally District, without following due process of law. lf notices so far not issued to the petitioners, the same shall be issued forthwith. As and when the petitioners are communicated with such notices, they shall submit their explanation, upon which the respondent authorities shall take action, in accordance with law. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. SD/. A.JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Z/7 SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// The State of Telangana, Rep, by Principale Secre^tary (MA and UD) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad' I elangana State The District Collector, Peddapalli District' The Municipal Commissioner, Ramagundam Municipal Corporation' dodavariktiani, Peddapalli District' OneCCtoSRIVEERASAVANCHAKRAVARTHYDARA,AdvocateIOPUCI TwoCCstoGPFoRMCPLADMNURBANDEV'HighCourtfortheStateof Telangana. [OUT] TwoCCstoGPFORREVENUE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad [OUT] One CC to SRI K.SIDDHARTH REDDY, SC FOR GHMC IOPUCI To, 1 2 a 4 5 6 7 8. Two CD CoPies BSK DqK HIGH COURT DATED:0811212025 CC TODAY I --'r. ; 1: r'- I i- ':.:\ t,, .-$t s! q- t-Iv. l:(]l '.': ( .(,- lr,-r;..-1 14 .i,t,_.... ._,_ _, _:;., -, . ,J LL i. \\. ORDER WP.No.37741 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \'k