High Court · 2025

1. ltr 9 vijay.anand, s/o. sri G. Venkatachary, occ. service, Karvy lnvestors 'ui-nii services Ltd- Re.gent chamberg Narim^an'foint, rttumo-ai' it iep. .Eegd;GFA. M..Srihari, S/o. MJN Rao, # {Q2, sowbhagya Aicad;, nlio r.ro.r, P.li"rg Hills, Hyderabnd_- 34 and cpA v. vugenor6 kumar, Sid. sri v.e. lajendra Prqqaci, Aged s5^yea1s,__puqiness, R/o.Hot tto Ag,Fiair.ro 3lz, sai Swapna Residency,-Road No 4, Film Nagai, Hyderabad _ 3 2. Smt. P.sudha Bgni. wo. sri .p..Achyutha. Ramaiah, aged 47 years, Housewife. R/o. Ftat No. !0J, sf sai Avenue, Ltc c;ioni, Siinigai cti;t: lf yderabad Rep. by her GpA v. yugendra Kumar, Sio.'bri V-ai.-naienoid Prasad, Age_d 55. years,_B-usiness, ry9..eto1 Ng A_Q,_'F!at No302, Sai'divapna Residency, Road No 4, Film Nagar, Hyderabad - SOb 033 3. Mr G.Bhasker, s/o. sri G.V. subbaiah, aged 52 years, Business, r/o. 6-3-609/ 17, Flat No. 2!!,. prashanthi, Anand Nalar col6ny, Khairatab;l, Hvoeraoao Rep. bf his GpA V. yugendra Kumar, sl6. sri v.B.'RaiendrjFrai'ao.'Aied ss years, 9usiness, R/o. Plot No A 9,-Flat No 302, sai srirapna neiioe-icylRoao No 4, Film Nagar, Hyderabad - S00 033 4. Mr B Harish Bg9dy, g/o. ti B raxma [eddy, aged 36 years, business, r/o. 48, Aditya Fort View, Near pupparaguda shiviiay5m, ruaiironda, Hvoeii'uao 5. |rt. l.Rajeswari, _wo. Sri I Raghava Rao, aged 4s years, occupation Housewife, D.No 8-3-960/1, Frat No 201, snbha"Enctave, sriiiagii e6iorr, Hyderabad

6. M..sailesh, S/o. M.K. viswanadham, aged'40 years, occ. Service, rlo. Too, fi 3'8Bxiifl :9[tr$:xi3ilin&Iennisv'Ivania;,lei3"r"i^*d;:::y"s.'; Business, rlo. 402, Jyothi palace, srinagar colony, uyberZoia- -- 7 6- 7. s.mt..Vegulla Usha @ Usha Rani, wo_.-sri v. Gopala Krishna Rao, aged ^years, ..9F"yprl'pn Housewife, R/o. #l02, praJantn -iowers, lb.oyt 59 srinivasa colony (wps!), Hydgrabad - 3g Rep. by hei GpA v. yuqendra (umqr, S/o. sri_V.B. Rajendr-a prasad, Aged Ss'yeiis, gusineii, nyo.Etu.ro A 9, Flat No 302, Sai Swapna Residencyi RoaO irlo 4,'Film Nig-dr, HyOeLOaO _33 -' -' AND

1. ptate, of rel?nqana,.rep..by its principar secretary (Municipal and urban uevetopment), Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyileiabad' ...PETITIONERS

2. The Greater Commissioner, ##"5?i"?: rfr :iig3ar borporation, 3' The Zonar commissioner, GHMC, west zone,serilingampa*y, Hyderabad represented by its ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or orders or Direction mainty in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or Direction by declaring the actioh of the respondents in not considering the apprication, 'si"i'e# by the petitioners under rayout regurarization ,nJ", tne. "rbrnitt"d ffiil";" o, ,n" Government for their respective plots 1,2,3,7, 10,22,23(p),Z4(p)and 4g of Guttalabegumpet V_iilage, seriringampaili Mandat, RR District in sy. Nos. 30 and 31 to the extent of 2143 sq.yds. ii contrary to taw, iilegal, violative of principles of natural justice and consequently to direct the reslpondents to consider the petitioners applications submitted for layout regularizaiion without insisting for No objection from Urban Land ceiling authorities as their plots are not covlred by the said provisions_of Urban tanJlceiting and Regutation) Act, 1g76 as per the order in WP No.202BTt2O13 dated'28_4_2014. Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, in" Hign court may be preased to direct the respondents to consider the apptications Jubmitted by the petitioners herein for rayout regurarization of their respective prots 1,2,3,7,10,22,23 (p),24(p) & 48 tota,y admeasu ring 2143 square yards in survey Nos. 30 & 31 0f Guttata Begurnpet Viilage,. seoiringamparty uanoam* ilJ;, without insisting for ,,No objection" from Urban Land ceilings as the provisions of Urban Land (ceiling & Regurarization) Act are not appticaire to the petitioners, rand, pending disposar of writ petition. Counsel for the petitioners: SMT A.ANASUYA counsel for the Respondent No.I: Gp FoR McpL ADMN & URBAN DEV counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: sRt G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC The Court made the foltowing: ORDER i : I l l j i' =ilil r HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WP.No.288Z3 of20t6 ORDER: I relief; This writ petition is fired seeking the forowing substantive " "' to issue an order or direction more particutarty one in the nature of writ of Mandomus declartng the acfion of respondent tn not considering the apprications submitted by the petitioners under layout regularization under the Scheme provided by the Governmentfor their respecttve plots 1,2, 3, 7, 10, 22, 23(p) 2a@) and 4g of Guttatabegumpet Viilage, Serilingampalli Manda,l RR District, in Sy.Nos.J0 and 3l rc the extent of 2143 sq yds qs contrqry to law, illegal and violative o.f principles of naturaliustice and consequently, ro direct the respondents fu consider the pefitioners applications submitted for layout regulorization without insisting for No objection from (Jrban Land ce,ing authorities as their plots are not covered by the said provisions of (Jrban Land ceiling and Regulatton Ad Ig76 as per the order in LItp.No.202g7/2013 dated 2g.0a.20t4.,, 2' when the matter is taken up for hearing, Iearned counser for the petitioners submitted that the cause in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication, since the grievance of the petitioners has arready been addressed 3 Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. I I I I I I I i I i i i I i I I I ; 2 LNA, J WP.No.28873 of 2016

4. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No costs. To, BHAVANI SWAMY ANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ! N OFFICER

1. One CC to SMT A.ANASUYA, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC IOPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad TOUTI

4. Two CD Copies (P BSR PMK \ \ HIGH COURT DATED:251081202s -, \ I ORDER WP.No.28873 of 201G i i ,:: $'1"4 , {... (, 2 0 tlr i$fi t<.' ';::. () :-. 2,/ + - -' .- ^-...-a,.-- DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS /4- ( ( A- 12, 15-