Hyderabad High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to quash all further proceedings in C.C. 915 of 2025' pending on the file of the vll Additional Judicial Magistrate First class at Medchal, against the petitioner/Accus;ed herein, and pass such other orde(s) as this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the interest of the Justice. I.A. N 1 AND 2 0F 2025 Between:

1. IVlohammr:d Akthar, S/o Mohd. Gulam Dastagiri, Aged bout.38 Years' Occ. Private, It/o H.No.12-44512. VNR Park, Near Raj Mahal Function Hall, Shamshal:ad, Ranga ReddY District. ...Respondent No.2rDefacto Complainant

2. Mohammr:d Abdul lmtiaz, S/o Abdul Gaffar. Aged about 50 Years, Occ' Business, R/o H.No.6-2-952l8, Road No.02,Kakatiya Nagar, Opp. Kakatiya College Gate,Nalgonda.

3. Mohammt:d Abdul Fouzan, S/o M ohammed Abdul lmtiaz, Aged aboul22 Vears, Occ. Student, R/o H.No.6-2-952l8, Road No.02, Kakatiya Nagar, Opp' Kakatiya ()ollege Gate, Nalgonda. ...Respondent No.3 & 4 AND '1. Mohammed Shadab Khan, S/o Mohammed Sikander Khan, Aged about 26 Years, Occ. Student, R/o H.No.64-9-76/A, Rahmanbagh, Azad Road, Rahmaniya Masjid, Nalgonda. ...Petitioner/Accused

2. State of T,:langana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at HYderabarJ. ...ResPondent No.1/ComPlainant Petltion under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Mermorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to pt:rmit the Petitioner/Respondent No.2 /petitioner to compound the offense in C.C.ltlo. 915 of 2025, registered U/ s. 106 (1),125 (b) BNSS Section 184 of MV on the file of Vll Additional Judicial Magistrate First class, Medchal in the interest of justice. r-A. NO: iB Petition under Section 359 (4) of BNSS Acl 2023 praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the , I High Court may be pleased to record the compromise, and quash the proceedings in C.C. No.9 15 of 2025 against petitioner herein on the file of the Vll Additional Judicial Magistrate First Class, Medchal in Crime No-27012025, U/s. 106 (1 ),125 (b) BNSS Section 184 of tM.V.Act, in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri MoHAMIVIED MASOOD ALl, Advocate for the Petitioner and the sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1, and of Sri Syed Yousuf Faisal, Advocate for the Respondent No'2' The Court made the fotlowing: COMMON ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TTIE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO I.A.Nos.l and 2 of 2O25 IN/AND PETITION No. L6257 of 2O2S Date: 22.12.2o125 Between: Mohamm,:d Shadab Khan. AND State of Telangana, represented by its Public Prosecutor, and three others .Petitioner/Accused ....Respondents COMMON ORDER: This; Crirninal Petition has been filed by the petitioner/accused seeking tc quash the proceedings in C.C. No.91 S of 2o2S on the file of the VII Additional Judicial Magistrate of First class Medchal.

2. Heard Mr.Mohammed Masood Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Syed Yousuf Faisal, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4 and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of respondent No.1-State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during the pendency of the present criminal p'etition, at the instance of the well wishers, relatives ancl elders, the parties have settled the disputes 2 pending between them and entered into compromise and filed Joint Memo. Accordingly, the parties have filed I.A.Nos.l and 2 of 2025 seeking permission to compound the offences and to record the compromise respectively.

4. This Court uid.e order, dated 09.12.2025, directed the parties i.e., the petitioner and respondent Nos.2 to 4, to appear before the High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, on 17.I2.2O25. In compliance of the said order, the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has submitted report, dated L6.I2-2O25, stating that the petitioner and respondent Nos.2 to 4 were duly identified with copies of their Aadhar Cards. It is further stated that the parties have willfully and without any coercion entered into comprornise.

5. In view of the said report and also in view of the compromise entered between the petitioner and respondent No.2 as well as the submissions made by the respective parties, I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the proceedings in C.C. No.915 of 2025 on the file of the VII Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class Medchal, are hereby quashed against the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed, subject to payment of costs of Rs.1O,O0O/- (Rupees ten thousand only) to the High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad and Rs.5,00O/- (Rupees five J thousand ,rnly) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, by the petitioner, on or before St.|Z.ZOZS. Misc:llaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY/ Sd/. N. SRIHARI DEPUTY REGISTRAR (? SECTION OFFICER To

1. The Vll Aclditional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Medcal, Cyberabad. 2. The Station House Officer, Shamirpet Police station, Cyberabad. 3. Two CCs 1o the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderaba<l [OUT]

4. One CC tc, SRI MOHAMI\XED IVIASOOD ALl, Advocate IOPUC] 5. One CC tc SRI SYED YOUSUF FAISAL, Advocate IOPUC] 6. Two CD Copies A copy of Joint [Vlemo of compromise enclosed herewith Note: Total Amount of Rs.15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen thousand only ) has been paid by Sri lt/lohammaC N/asood Ali Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order,Jated 22.12.2025 as Rs.10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) to the "High Court t-egal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, High Court Buildings Hyderabad, and Rs.5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed lVlemo as proof of compliarrce USR No.151967 of 2025. NVB/PR 7ik* HIGH COURT DATED:ir.211212025 COMMON ORDER r' s l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2O2S ln/And CRLP.No,IOZS7 of 2025 0 2 F:?, 2flrr (.) .-t- .) l/z ',y :k { T. ALLOWIN G THE CRIMINAL PETITTON AND r.A.Nos.1 AND 2 2025 ^)>>l 'l>6' MEMORANDUM OF PETITION (Under Section 359(6) of B.N.S.S., ACT-2O231 HIGH COURT OF. JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA crr.P Nd,.$;1(V-"r .IN 2o.25 C.C No. 915 of 2o.25 ( On the file of Hon'b1e VII Additional Judicial Magistrate First Class at Medchal) Bbtween :- MOHAMMED SHADAB KHAN S/o Mohammed Sikander Khan, Aged about 26 Years, Occ: Student, R/o'H.No.64-9-76 / A, Rahmanbagh, Azad Road, Rahmaniya Masjid, Nalgonda AND ... Petitioner /Accused

1. State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad. ... ResPondent No. l/ComPlainant

2.MOHAMMED AKTHAR, S/o Mohd. Gulam Dastagiri, Aged bout:38 Years, Occ: Private, R/o H.No. 12-445/2. VNR Park, Near Raj Mahal Function Hall, Shamshabad, Ranga Reddy District. ... Respondent No.2/Defacto Complainant

3. MOHAMMED ABDUL IIU.ITIAZ, S/o Abdul Gaffar. Aged about"50 Years, Occ: Business, R/o H.No.6-2-952/8, Road No.02, Kakatiya Nagar, Opp: Kakatiya College Gate, Nalgonda. sk"b,b kt *r Gt - r<L/e il%'

4. MOHAMIYIED ABDUL FOUZAN, S/o M oharnmed Abdulkntiaz, Aged about:22 Years, Occ: Student, R/o H.N o.6"2-952 /8, Road No.02, Kakatiya NeLgar, Opp: Kakatiya College Gate, Nalgonda. JOINT o BY ...Respondent3&4 # It is submitted that the peti tioner f accused and the respondent No.2 to 4 wr:re compromised and the respondents have no objections to quashing all the proceeding the U/s. 1O6 (1),125 (b) BNS & Section 184 of MV Act in c.c.No. 915 0f 2025, on the file of Hon'ble vII Addl' Judicial Magistrate First C1ass,Medchal and record the Memorandum of compromisr: thereby discharge the petitioner/Accused from the charges of U/s. 106 (ll,l25 (b) BNS & Section 184 of MV Act of the above case', since the above case compromised in the interest of justice else the petltioner and the Respondent No. 2 to 4 will suffer irreparable loss \AU$re Petitioner "*'" Coun for the Petitioner and hardshiP Respond.S$uk-, Respondenr- No.3 rl l" bfr, Responden r: No.4 Counsel for St tohott _|tf,",