The High Court · 2025

Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to quash c.c.Noj36 of 2025 on the file of XVI Additional chief Judicial itlagistrate ai Nampally Criminal Courts, Hyderabad and grant such other relief or reliefs as this court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. l.A. NO: 2OF 2025 Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including the appearance .of_.the i,etitioners in i.C.ruo.aO of 2O25 on the file of XVI Additional Chief Judicial tvtagistrate at Nampally Criminal Courts, Hyderabad pending disposal of the above Criirinal petition and grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between : Adil Ahmec, S/O Nazeer Ahmed, Aged 27 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.19-3- 7031N 16/8, Kumanruadi, Fathe Darwaza, Hyderabad. Petitioner/De-facto Complainant in LA No.3 and 4 of 2025 AND 1 The State of Telangana,, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings, Hyderatrad

2. Sultan Ein [Vlohammed Abdullah Sharayee,, S/o Mohammed, aged about 36 years, Or;c. Business, R/o.H.No.18-10-242, Barkas, Chandrayangutta, Hyderabad ...RespondenUAccused in l.A No.3 and 4 of 2025 Petition under Section 359D(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the fulemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant permission to compromise the case C.C.No.36 of 2025 on the file of XVI Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Nampally Criminal Courts, Hyderabad by compounding the offence in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 4 OF ZO25 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the [Vlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to re,;ord the compromise between Petitioner/De-facto Complainant & RespondenU F,ccused in the case C.C.No.36 of 2025 on the file of XVI Add. Chief Judicial 'l\4agistrate at Nampally Criminal Courts, Hyderabad by compounding the offence in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of (lriminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S CHAKRAPANI ,Advocate for the Petitioner and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Pukrlic Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and Mr.Syed Shafiullah Quadri, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OT TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE ITONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENryAS RAO _t.e.fos.a ana + of ZOX IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.16249 of 2OZS Date: L9.L2.2O25 Between: Sultan Bin Mohammed Abdullah Sharayee . . . . Petitioner/ accused AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad and another Respondents :: COMMON ORDERj: ' This Criminal Petition has been filed by the petitioner/accused seeking to quash the proceedings in c.C.No.36 of 2o2s on the file of the XVI Additional chief Judicial Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, for the offence punishable under section 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2. Heard Mr. s. chakrapani, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Syed shafiullah Quadri, learned counsel for respondent No.2, and Mr'Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Pr-rblic Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of respondent No.l-State. 2 Lcarned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during the

3. pendenc:y of the present Criminal Petition, at the instance of the well wishers. relatives and eldcrs, the parties have settled the disputes pending between them and entered into compromise and filed Joint Memo. Accordingly, the parties have filed IA.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 seeking permission to compromisc the matter and to record the comprornise re spec tivelY.

4. This Court uide order, dated 09.12.2025, directed the parties i.e., the petitioner and respondent No.2, to appear before the High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, on or before 16.12.2025 for thei:' identification. In compliance of the said order, the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has submitted a report, dated t7.I2.2O25, stating that the petitioner and respondent No.2 were duly identifit:d with copies of their Aadhar Cards. It is further stated that the pa::ties have willfully and without any coercion entered into compromisc.

5. In view of the said report and also in vibw of the compromise entered between the petitioner and respondent No.2 as well as the submissions made by the respective parties, I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed.. Consequently, the proceedings in C.C.No.36 of 2025 on the lite of the XVI Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, are hereby quashed against the petitioner. J 6' Accordingly, the criminar petition is allowed, subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand onry) to the High court Legal Services committee, Hyderabad, and Rs.S,ooo/- (Rupees five thousand only) to the Terangana High court Advocates, Association, Hyderabad, by the petitioner, on or before Sl.l2.2O2S. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. /TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The XVI Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Nampally. 2. The Station House Officer, Shalibanda Police Station, Hyderabad 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the state of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUf]

4. One CC to SRI S.CHAKRAPANI Advocate IOPUC] 5. One CC to [Vlr.Syed Shafiullah Quadri Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies Svs/PSL (Along with a copy of Joint Mcmo) w Note : Total Amount of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only )has been paid by Sri S.Chakrapani, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 19.12.2025 as Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) to the Secretary, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad and; Rs.5,000i- (Rupees Five thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyder.abad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No.'153144 of 2025, dated 31 I 1212025. HIGH COURT DATED:'1911212025 OR TTiE s r il ufr * COMMON ORDER t.A NO.3 AND 4 0F 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.16249 of 2025 ALLOWING THE I.A NO.3 AND 4 OF 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.16249 of 2025 fre"*1"' . IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA AT HYDER,ABAD Between: Crl.P. *o.1, lt' 2\1 of 2025 Adil Ahmed, S/o Nazeer Ahmed, Aged 27 years, Occ: Business, R/o H.No.19-3 -7031 Alt6lB, Kumarwadi, Fathe Darwaza, Hyderabad. ... Petitioner/De-facto Complainant m B" Sultan Bin Mohammed Abdullah Sharaye€, " S/o Mohammed, aged about 36 years, Occ: Business, R/o.H.No.18-10 -242, Barkas, Cha ndraya ngutta, Hyderabad. .. Respondent/ Accused : ]OINT MEMO FILED BY BOTH PARTIES May it please your lordship, 1. It is submitted that the Petitioner/De-facto Complainant bnd 2nd . r , ,., RespondenVAccused are friends for several years and belong to the same locality, sharing cordial personal and family relations.

2. It is submitted that the incident dated 30-03-2025 arose out of a minor misunderstanding and momentary quarrel, which occurred due to miscommunication and emotional outburst between friends. However, a Police Case is registered i.e., FiR No.39 of 2025 in shahalibe nda porice station, Hyderabad. Thereafter a chaigesheet was filed by tlre police i.e., c.c.No.36 of z0z5 on the file of xvl Addl. chief Judicial Magistrate, Nampaily criminar Courts, Hyderabad. 3. It i:; submitted that there was absorutery no intention on part of either the Petitioner or the Respondent No.2 to cause any harm, and the incident was immediatery regretted by both parties. 4. It i:; submitted that with the intervention of elders, well-wishers ' amicably s:ettled their dispute. They have understood that the issue was trivial, m.mentary and does not deserve continuation of criminal prosecutior. 5. The petitioner/complainant has voruntariry and wiilingty agreed to compromise the matter and has fitecl an affidavit stating that he has no objection for quashing the criminar proceedings in c.c.No.36rof zoz5 pending before the court of the Hon,bre xvl Addr. chief rudiciar Magistrate, Nampaily criminar courts, Hyderabad. The Respondent No.2 is ready to appear before this Hon,bre court to confirm the compromisrl, and prays that the matter may be closed in view of the settlement 'eached between the parties. It is s;ubmitted that the Petitioner and the 2nd Respondent have entered into compromise ancr in view of the same, the petitioner/De Facto r ,ft .--;l comprainant has no obiection for quashing of the proceedings again$ the peritioners/AccusedinC.C.No.36ofZozspendinsOeroltleCourt:tt:: Hon,bre xvl Addl. chief rudicial Magistrate, Nampa*y criminar courts' Hyderabad' Hence' Memo Hence, this loint Memo' Signature of the Signature of the Hvderabad, Oate: O2-t2-2025 e^--k-+'It" AJC --LAvo Pagot ,/f- I ! I I tf' ,h :it g & 8. u d IE i3 i* E rE ,ai ,fr t !l !i 'i ! i I s