Jeedi Venkataramulu v. 1. State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not conducting survey and not fixing the boundaries to the agricultural land admeasuring 1.30 guntas of Sy.No.297lG, land admeasuring Ac. 0.11 guntas of Sy.No.297 and land admeasuring Ac.1.09 guntas of Sy.No.299/A, Ac. 1.09 guntas of Sy.No.299/L and Ac. 0.29 guntas of Sy.No.299/G situated at Maddur Village and Mandal, Narayanapet District of the petitioner pursuant to the File No.A11156f2O25, Dt. 2810812025 and File No.A1115612025, Dt. 08/1112025 of the Sth respondent as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia apart from statutory violations and consequently direct the respondents to conduct survey and fix the boundaries to the petitioner's agricultural' land admeasuring 1.30 guntas of Sy.No.297lG, land admeasuring Ac. 0.11 guntas of Sy.No.297 and land admeasuring Ac.1.09 guntas of Sy.No.299/A, Ac. 1.09 guntas of sy'No'299/L and Ac' 0'29 guntas of sy.No.299/G situated at Maddur Village and Mandal, Narayanapet Distri-ct. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 'tro Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired.in support of the. peiition, ih; High court may be preased to direct the respondents conduit' survey ano iii the boundaries to the petitioner's agricurturar rand admeasurlng-_1,s0 gr;ir. of sy.No.2g7rc, rand admeasuring Ac. 0_.11 guntas of sy.No-2gz-"ni-l;no admeasuring Ac.1.09 guntas of sy.No.299/A, Ac. 1.09 gunias of sv.r.ro.iggfl_ ano Ac. 0.29 guntas of sy'No'299/G situated at Maddui-village ano Narayanapet District pursuant to the notices issued in File ru_6.nilt iaizszi, Dt. 28.08.202s and Fire sot2o25' Dt' 08' 11'2a25 ot ine stn respondent, penoing disposar of writ H,fJf counsel for the petitioner: sRr v. BRAHMATAH cHowDARy counsel for the Respondents: sRt K. MAHESH, ASST. Gp FoR REVENUE The Court made the foltowing: ORDER -tr,t-r,io"t, INTHEHIGHcoURTFoRTHESTATEoFTELAI{GAI{AAT I TDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL t9 Da o5 12. Between: Jeedi Venkatramulu And .Petitioner The State of Telangana, Rep. by its PrinciPal Secretary, Revenue DePartment, Secretariat, HYderabad and five others ORDER: Respondents ThisWritPetitionisfiledpra]rrngthisCourttodeclarethe action of respondent authorities in not conducting suwey and not fixing the boundaries to the agricultural land admeasuring Ac.1.3O guntas in Sy-No '297 /G; Ac'O'11 guntas in Sy'No'297; Ac. 1.09 guntas' in Sy.No' 299 / A; Ac' 1'09 guntas in Sy'No'299 /L' and Ac.O.29 guntas in Sy'No'299/G of Maddur Village and Mandal, Narayanapet District (hereinafter referred to aS ..the subjectland")pursuanttothenoticesissuedinF..ile No.A1/15612025'dated28.08.2025andFileNo.ALlL56l2o25' dated0g.ll.202:c,asillegal,arbTtrary.violativeofprinciplesof naturaljusticeand'violativeofArticles14,2land3oo-Aofthe : i i I I 2 EW, J Wp_37419 '2025 constitution of India and consequenfly, prayed, for other appropriate reliefs. 2- Heard sri V.Brahmaiah chowdhary, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri K.Mahesh, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents and with their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would. submit that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of the subject land having purchased the same through two registered sale deeds bearing document Nos. LLT3 and LLZ6 of 2o2s, both dated 3L.o7.2o25. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that, in order to avoid unnecessary complications with the neighbouring land owners, the petitioner filed an application before the respondents for demarcation and fixing of the boundaries by paylng necessary... amount uide challan, dated L6.o8.2o25. It is stated that, acting on the said F-Line application, respondent No.5 had issued notices in File No.Al/L5612025, dated 28.08.2025 fixing the date of survey of the subject land on o3.og.2o2s but the survey was not conducted on that day and again another notice, dated 3 EW,J Wp_37419 2025 O8.I1.2O25 was issued stating that the survey is scheduled to be conducted on 15.11.2025. The grievance of the petitioner is that, even though notices were issued, the respondent authorities did not conduct survey or demarcate the subject land. Therefore, he prays this Court to pass appropriate orders.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents would submit that, survey notices were already issued and since the latest survey notice, dated 08.11.2025 was issued to conduct the survey on

15.LL.2025 has become infructuous, the present writ petition is Iiled on 04.12 ?O25- He would further submit that the respondent authorities would take further action in due course , of time.

5. Having heard the learned counSel for the respective parties and on penrsal of the material on f6cord, since respondent No.S has not conducted the survey pursuant to the notice, dated O8.1L.2O25, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition directing respondent No.S to take appropriate action on the application made by the \ 4 EW, J wp_)7419 2O2s petitioner for conducting survey and demarcation of the subject tand in consonance with law by issuing notices to all the stakeholders and after considering their objections, shall conduct survey of the subject land, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed SD/.P.PONNA KRISHNA ANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/ ON OFFICER To, -u.tIv?iliLt iid'"ii'" D;vision' Naravanapet' Secretariat, HYderabad' NaravanaPet District. l.ThePrincipalsecretary,RevenueDepartment'stateofTelangana, 2. i#' iliriCi C6il;;iilii"'"v"napet District at Naravanaoet' 3. The Revenue Dd;6h;ibTii""r, i A!^^-:^r 4. iftT;ii]'ioii riidd ur Mandal, Naravanapet District' S. The D istrict sur!i"i,m;;:'#rd, [dnO Hecords, Naraval?pet District' 6. The Mandal sr*"dvJr,'M"oour rrll!4a!, N?t:t-y-"tl"pet District' 7. One CC to SRt \i='B"RttittdtAH_C.t1O\^/DARV-, Ad'vocate IOPUCI B. Two CCs to cpiO"nHeVLr'rUEIHlgn Court fbr the State of Telangana' f. iwo CD CoPies BN BS HIGH COURT DATED:05/1212025 ORDER WP.No.37419 ot 2025 __-'1:\ { E S, J o L) 19 EEr rul I * ...,:r:(\ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 'v) 14,