The High Court · 2025

Petition Under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more, particularly the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents No. 2 to 4 in effecting mutation of the name of the Petitioner in respect of the lands admeasuring as per the application_No. vide Nos.210010439s for..an exten! o[Ac 7-0p Gts in sy No. 75lAAl10, application No. 2100104421 tor an extent of Ac 1-2o Gts in sy No. 75lAAl7AAl1l1l1, application No. 2100105599 for an extent of Ac 0-20 Gts in sy No. 75lAA/9/1 , apprication No. 2100105623 for an exteht of Ac 0-13 in sy No. 75lAAl1o and application No. 210010s647 lor an extent of Ac 0-14 in sy No. 75lAAl11 thus in all Ac 9-27 Gts situated at Rudraram Village and Gram Panchayat, shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and also in not entering the name of the Petitioner in the integrated in Land records as per provisions of Bhu Bharti Record of Rights Land Act 2025 as illegal and arbitrary consequently to direct the Respondents No. 2 to 4 to effect the mutation of the name of the Petitioner in respect of the above said land as per the applications made by the Petitioner. |.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No. 2 to 4 to effect mutation of the name of the Petitioner as perthe application No. vide Nos.2100104395 foran extent of Ac 7-00 Gts in sy No. 75tAAt1O, 2100104421 for an extent of Ac 1-2O Gts in sy No. tStAAl7AAt1l1t1,2100105599 for an extent of Ac 0-20 Gts in sy No. 75lAA/9/1, 2100105623 for an extent of Ac 0-13 in sy No. 75lAAl10 and 2100105627 for an extent of Ac 0-14 in sy No. 75lAAl11 thus in all Ac 9-27 Gts situated at Rudraram Village and Gram Panchayat, Shabad [Vandal, Ranga Reddy District,pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SRINIVAS VELAGAPUDI Counsel for the Respondents : SRI K.MAHESH, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER ! IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL IVRIT PETITION 0.37339 of 2o25 Date: O5.12.2O25 Between: Mandadi Srinivasa Rao And ..Petitioner The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Bhavan, Hyderabad and three others ORDER: ..Respondents This Writ Petition is filed praying this Court to declare the action of respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not considering the online applications submitted by the petitioner seeking for mutation of his name in the revenue records and consequential issuance of e-pattadar passbook in respect of the land admeasuring Acs.7.O0 guntas in Sy.No.7S IAAILO; Ac.1.20 guntas in Sy.No.75lA lTA /LI1Il, Ac.O.2O guntas in Sy.No.7slAAl9IL, Ac.o.13 guntas in Sy.No.75 lA /LO and Ac.0.14 guntas in Sy.No.75/ AA/11 of Rudraram Village, Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and not entering the name of the petitioner t_l -_ I I I E l \ 2 EW, J Wp_37339J025 Bhu Bharati Portal, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently, prayed for other appropriate reliefs'

2. Heard Sri Srinivas Velagapudi, learnod counsel for the petitioner and Sri K.Mahesh, learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents and with their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the

3. petitioner has made several online applications seeking to mutate the name of the petitioner in respect of the land admeasuring Acs.7.O0 guntas in Sy.No.75/AA/ 10; Ac.1.20 guntas in Sy.No.75l AAlTA ll I lll, Ac'0'20 guntas in Sy.No.75l AAlg l I, Ac.O.13 guntas in Sy'No'7S/AA/ 10 and Ac.0.14 guntas in Sy.No.75IA l11of Rudraramvillage, shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District by paying requisite fee. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that, basing on the said applications online slot bookings were fixed seeking the presence of the parties on 17.03.2O2I. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the said applications were respondent No.4 excePt neither accePted nor rejected bY dodging the matter- Therefore, the petitioner made a c ! 3 EVV, J Wp_37339_2025 representation, dated 26.06.2025 before respondent No.3 expressing his grievance. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that, even after receipt of the said representation also, no actio;r is taken by the petitioner. Hence, having no other option, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking appropriate orders.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue would submit that the petitioner frled the present writ petition after a lapse of four years and has not agitated the action of the respondent authorities at the earliest point of time. He would, however, submit that the official respondents, after conducting thorough enquiry on the applications submitted by the petitioner, would communicate the decision taken by respondent No.4, as expeditiously as possible.

5. Having considered the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and on perusal aqd examination of the material on record would disclose that the petitioner has already submitted online application seeking for mutation of his name and consequential issuance of pattadar passbook and slots have already been lixed in the year 2021 and thereafter, there is no communication to , I 4 EW, J Wp_37339_2025 the petitioner on the status of the his applications. Under the above circumstances and since no communication to that effect is given by respondent No.4, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition, directing respondent No.4 to communicate the decision taken on the applications submitted by the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. \ //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT -, ,! SD/. C. DEEPIKA ISTRAR Reg SECTION OFFICER To

1. The principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretdriat Bhavan, State of Telangana at HYderabad.

2. The D"istrict Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Kongara Kalan. 5. fne nevenue Divisional Ofricer, Chevella Revenue Division, Chevella, Ranga 4. The Tahsildar, Shabad Mandal, Shabad, Ranga RedlY District.. S. fwo CCSto Cp FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Reddy District. Hyderabad.tOUTl

6. Oire CC to SRt SR;NIVAS VELAGAPUDI, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CD Copies SA GJP ?,+ a 1(,(' l, 2 22 tEc mf * t) ' 4,-- * ri;D HIGH COURT DATED:05/1212025 ORDER WP.No.37339 of 2025 I DISPOSING OF THE W.P AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS. ?r % lv D