The High Court · 2025

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PRABHAKAR.J, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI VENTRAPRAGADA ARAVIND Counsel for the Respondent No.1: AGp FOR HIGHER EDU(IATION Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI A.P.SURESH RAM, SC FOR TGCHE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 TO 7: SRI MALIPEDDI SRINIVAS REDDY, SC FOR OU The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION No.3733 4 of 2025 DATED: 05.12.2025 Between : Sri Ventrapragada NS Chandra Bose Petitioner And The State of Telangana and Others .... Respondents ORD ER: Heard Sri Prabhakar. J, learned senior designated counsel representing Sri V.Aravind, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner on record, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Higher Education appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1, Sri A.P.Suresh Ram, learned standing counsel for TGCHE appearing on behalf of the respondent No.2 and Sri Malipeddi Srinivas Reddy, learned standing counsel for Osmania University appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.3 to 7. 2 The oetitioner aooroached the Court see ino Draver as u nder: "... to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction preferably in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No. 3 based on the Representations, dated 03.12.2025 and 27.I1.2025 in non allotting the seat in Post Graduate Degree in Law t \**l - 2 Education (Master of Laws/ Legum Magister') for 2 years course for academic year 2025-26 in spiter of having merit and qualification and secured the rank 1.387 with in zone of consideration in pursuance rriith detailed notiFication released by Respondent No.3 is irrr ex facie as arbitrary illegal and in violation of the funda rental rights Article 14, 21, 2t-A guaranteed under Corstitution of India apart from being in violation of the fundamental guarantees contained in Article 3004 and in violation of rules in notification and in violation against catena of Judgements of Honourable Courts and set asicle the same of Spot Admission Guidelines.". It is represented by the learned senior designated 3. counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the subject issue in the present writ petiticrn ls sq ua rely covered by the order of this Court, dated 18.1.1..2O25 passed in W.P.No.35183 of 2025.

4. The learned Assistant Government Plearder for Higher Education appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1, learned standing counsel for TGCHE appearirrg on behalf of the respondent No.2 and learned standing counsel for Osmania University appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.3 to 7 do not dispute the said submission made by the sen ror designated counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. J

5. Taking into consideration the fact as borne on record that under similar circumstances, this Court disposed of W.P.No.35183 of 2O25 vide its order, dated 1g.11.2025 and had passed orders in favour of the petitioner thereunder and, the present writ petition is atso disposed of in terms of the order of this Court, dated 1g.11.2025 passed in W.P.No.35183 of 2(J25. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, any pending, in the Writ petition shall also stand closed. To //TRUE COPY// SD/. A.JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER Hyderabad State Secretariat, Hyderabad. State of Telanoana.

1. The Principal Secretary, for Higher Edllgation, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Telangana 2. The Honble Chairmin, Telangana Council foi Higtrer Education (TGCHE), 3. The Convener, TS PG LCET - 2025. Osmania University, Hyderabad. ! ffe lice - Chancellor, Osmania University, Hyderabad.- - 5. The Regiskar, Osmania University, Hyder'abaiJ. 6. The Principr!, 9.9 College of Law, O.U Campus, Hyderabad. 7. The Principqlf -c, _C_o]tgge of Law. Basheerbbgh. Hyderabad. B. One CC to SRI VENTR4PE4GADA ARAVtNDIAdv6cate [OPUC] 9. Two CCs to GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATTON, High Court f6r the State of - Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] 10. One CC to SRI A.P SURESH RAM, SC FOR TGCHE tOpUCl 1'l One CC to SRI MALIPEDDI SRIN|VAS REDDY, SC FOR Or..tlOpUCI 12.Two CD Copies (Along with a copy of the order dated 18.11 .2025 in Wp.No.3S183 of 202s1 PSK PSK HIGH COURT DATED:0511212025 CC TODAY ORDER WP.No.37334 of 2025 IIFo r< !'--. $'., "$\t\" \ \.. l/D,u + tr '. 'E---*,-;:'.';" ii,:. l, - \.,--) \.-, DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS l I \b ^ HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA PETITION No.3518 oF2 2 ORDER: Heard Sri Chikkudu Prabhakar, learned counsel representing Sri Ch.Chaitanya Mithra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner on record, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Higher Education appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1, Sri A.P.Suresh Ram, learned standing counsel for TGCHE appearing on behalf of the respondent No.2 and Sri Malipeddi Srinivas Reddy, learned standing counsel for Osmania University appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.3 to 6.

2. The oetitioner aooroached the Court seekino amended praver as rtnder; "...to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 3 in non allotting the seat in Post Graduate Degree in Law-Education (Master of Laws/ Legum Magister) for 2 years course for academic year 2025-26 in spite of having merit and qualification and secured the rank 403 with in zone of consideration in pursuance with detailed notiFication released by Respondent No.3 is an ex facie illegal, arbitrary, discrimination, unfair, unreasonable, unconstitutional and violation of principles of natural justice under articles 14,2L,2IA of Constitution of India and in 2 SN, J violation of rules in notification and in violati()r against catena of Judgments of Honble Courts and set erside the same of Spot Admission Guidelines and pass.. .' T eca !s---pcI--!he averments made bv th oetitioner in the affidavit filed bv e the oetitioner in suooort of the oresent Writ pr1!Glq4j5__a5 u nder: - It is the specific case of the petitioner that ttte petitioner had applied for entrance exam in the stream of L _1,'l through TG PG LAWCET-2025 and had attended the entranc,l exam with Hall Ticket bearing No.32532110393 and had secured a Rank of 403 in the stream of LLM in TG pG LAWCET-2025. It is further the case of the petitioner that as per the information available on the website, the LLM certificate verification was scheduled to commence from 25.08.1025 for the academic year 2025-26, but however, the same had been postponed by the respondent University due to certain internal reasons and the petitioner had checked the univers ity website regularly till Diwali and thereafter, the petitioner fell sicl< and was unable to check the website for a few days and 'rvhen the petitioner had checked website again the registra.ions were closed for online certificate veriFication, but the petitio rr:r did not I l SN, J receive any SMS alerts or any prior intimation contrary to the notification which indicated certain specific dates in the admission process, and the petitioner therbafter opted for second phase counseling, choosing only respondent Nos.5 & 6 colleges, but the petitioner however could not secure a seat in the LLM admission for the academic year 2025-26 and therefore, the petitioner requested respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein to verify the LLM seats by duly examining the admission status of the students who reported after completing the joining formalities in accordance to the rules after the 1tt and 2nd phase counseling and to consider the request of the petitioner for admission in the stream of LLM through TS PG LAWCET-2025 in the vacant LLM seats under the spot admission category as per the spot admission guidelines uploaded on the website. However, though the representation of the petitioner, dated 13.LL.2025 had been acknowledged by the respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein, no action had been initiated on the said request of the petitioner, dated 13.11.2025 till as on date. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner approached the Court by filing the present writ petition. IT 4 SN, J

4. PERUSED THE RECORD. A The reoresentation of

13.11.2025 addressed to the res Dondent the oetitio ner, dated l{os.1 to 3 herein is extracted hereunder:- I submit that I had applied for entrance €xam stream of L.LM into TS PGLAWCET -2025 and I attended entrance exam with hall ticket bearing 32532110393 and I have secured a rank of .103 in stream of LLM into TS PGLAWCET -2025. no: I respectfully further submit that I had seen ir the news paper advertisement given by Convenor, TCLawcet/ TG PGLCET -2025 Admn. Dated 26-07-2025 and tl-e same was uploaded in the website and the information mentioned like for LL. M certification verification will be comrnence from 25-08-2025 for the academic year 2025-2026. However, it was postponed due to internal reasons ofTS PCLCET-2025, Osmania U niversity. I respectfully further submit that I have beerr checked website till before Diwali and after that I was sir:k unable to check website for some days. In mean tim: First web counselling registrations completed that the information not informed by SMS Alerts for resuming LL. Fl admission process as it was advertised dates earliest and halted hopefully with internal reasons. I had registered for 2nd phase counselling and I opted only for O.U. Campus & P.G. College of Law due to less seats availability, I did not secured seat what I lrad chosen stream selection seat in the LL.M Admission for 2:025-26. I have much enthusiastic admit into Ll...l\4 about University/Campus/Govt. Institutions for highe- education in law, Self Finance(Evening). However, I request your esteemed authority 16, verify the LL.l'l Seats V/s Admission status oF students wtrc reported through joining formalities 1 & 2nd phase couns,:lling and I- 5 SN, J leftover vacant LL.M seats for spot admission category and ioi to tur" wise decision with utmost prioritv on ;;h; urgency of spot aom'ssion guidelines uploaded in the website. D s c N U I N

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the limited relief sought for by the petitioner in the present writ petition is a direction to the 3"d respondent to consider the grievance of the petitioner as vide Petitioner's put-forth bY addressed to the l't representation, respondent herein and also to the 2"d & 3'd respondent the Petitioner dated 13.11.2025 herei n. S.Learnedstandingcounselappearingonbehalfofthe respondent Nbs.3 to 6 fairty submits that the writ petition could be disposed of directing the 3'd respondent to consider the grievance of the petitioner as put-forth by the petitioner vide petitioner's representation' dated L3.t:..2O25 addressed to the respondent Nos'1 to 3 herein, in accordance to law' within a reasonable period' 6 SN, J 7 Le ned counsel aopea rinq on behalf of the oetationer d esn u e the lear ed a e r'3SDO ndent Nos.3 to 6. Takinq intoco side atio 8 a) The aforesaid facts and circumstances of thr: case. b) The submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on beharf of the petitioner and rearned standing counser appearing on beharf of the respondent Nos. 3 to 6 c) The contents of the representation of the pr:titioner, dated 13.11.2025 addressed to the respondent Nos.1 to 3 having been acknowledged by the said respondents. d) The fact that no orders had been passed on the said representation of the petitioner, dated 13.11.2025 addressed to the respondent Nos.l to 3 herein tiil as on date. e) The discussion and conclusion as arrived at para Nos.5 to 7 of the present order. t. SN, J n t e 3 rd n r s ntati n, 7 T Wri P n DUt -fort h v 1 3.1 L.202 5 n e n n eo D ti roner,s rt in rnot othe reou esto re rese ft he D ittoner for r s r I r2 r2 5-2 d e t a h the m rl a a a v c n L s r r t e t M u o n h a m s T n a criteria fort he LL v rl u M cour I n h n r I a o !s n r o n o h a -2 2 e fort he h t e e it ne e o 1 e e kfr n e o o e Miscellaneous Petitions' if e r b dfly, Pending in this Writ o Petition, shall stand closed' Date: 18'11.2O25 Note: Issue CC bY todaY MRS. JUSTIC E SUREPA LLI NANDA