Mandadi Sailaja v. 'l . The State Of Telangana

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SRIN|VAS VELAGAPUDT counsel for the Respondents : SRI K.MAHESH, AGp FoR REVENUE The court at the stage of admission made the foilowing oRDER r...r.1;i #:;.:j.. ,t,., , . . . q IN THE HIGH COURT TOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL UIRIT PETITION 0.37353 of 2ol25l Date: O5.12.2O25 Between: Mandadi Sailaja And Petitioner The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Bhavan, Hyderabad and three others ORDER: ..Respondents This Writ Petition is filed praying this Court to declare the action of respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not considering the online applications submitted by the petitioner seeking for mutation of his name in the revenue records and consequential issuance of e-pattadar passbook in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.O.26 guntas, Ac.O.26 guntas; Ac.O.17 guntas and Ac.O.11 guntas in Sy.Nos.75l 17, 75117 I l; 75lAAl7 and 751ie respectively; Acs.2.1O guntas in Sy.No.7Slaa/9/l and Acs.2.3O guntas in Sy.No.75/aa/9/2 of Rudraram Village, Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and not entering the name of the petitioner in 2 ,_\ EW, J Wp_37353_2025 Bhu Bharati Portal, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently, prayed for other appropriate reliefs. 2- Heard Sri Srinivas Velagapudi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri K.Mahesh, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents and with their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made several online applications seeking to mutate the name of the petitioner in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.O.26 guntas, Ac.O.26 guntas; Ac.0.17 guntas and Ac.0.11 guntas in Sy.Nos.75l 17, 75l17lL; 75lAAI7 and Acs.2.30 guntas in Sy.No.75/aal9/2 of Rudraram Village, Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District by paying requisite fee. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that, basing on the said applications online slot bookings were fixed seeking the presence of the parties on O6.O3.2O2L. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the said applications were neither accepted nor rejected by respondent No.4 except dodging the matter. Therefore, the petitioner made ) I I 3 EW, J Wp_37353_2025 a representation, dated 26.06.2025 before respondent No.3 expressing her grievance. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that, even after receipt of the said representation also, no action is taken by the petitioner. Hence, having no other option, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking appropriate orders.

4. Learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue would submit that the petitioner filed the present writ petition after a lapse of four years and has not agitated the action of the respondent authorities at the earliest point of time. He would, however, submit that the official respondents, after conducting thorough enquiry on the applications submitted by the petitioner, would communicate the decision taken by respondent No.4, as expeditiously as possible.

5. Having considered the learned counsel for the petitioner perusal and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and on . and examination of the material on record would disclose that the petitioner has already submitted online application seeking for mutation of her name and consequential issuance of pattadar passbook and slots have already been fixed in the year 2021 and thereafter, there is no communication to \ \ I I : I i _1 ,i; '1 i! u 4 EVV, J Wp_37353 2025 t, .'i,r \^ the petitioner on the status of the his applications. Under the above circumstances and since no communication to that effect is given by respondent No.4, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition, directing respondent No.4 to communicate the decision taken on the applications submitted by the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6- With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. I ( *SD/.C. DEEPIKA ANT REGISTRAR ,/TRUE COPY/ SECTION OFFICER \ To

2. 3. 4. TfrS E R:?, ffil, s n, o 5. uql 9.? 1,-s f ? Ii * I3i P3 n?o g D i st ri ct Two CCs to Gp FdriHEVENUt, Hightourt ior the State of Telangana B[1"5t?S rtR,uJA, * rvAs vE LAG Ap u D r, Ad vocate [o P U c] "o

6. 7. Two CD CoPies SA BS HIGH COURT DATED:05/1 212025 ORDER WP.No.37353 of 2025 'i t'tE .:; t 'rJ _) i- 22 Ett tgffi + ,,.: - .'' ) fr \i. 't .i :i ;l I DISPOSING OF THE W.P AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS tn- 7o \2. \ r' / ;1 . .r.1 ':iiH