The High Court · 2025

Judgment

3. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Bhavan, Hyderabad. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Kongara Kalan The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Revenue Division, Chevella, Ranga Reddy District

4. The Tahsildar, Shabad Mandal, Shabad, Ranga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 oI lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more, particularly the nature of Writ of fi/andamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents No. 2lo 4 in effecting mutation of the name of the Petitioner in respect of the lands admeasuring as per the application No. 2100103888 for an extent of Ac 1-20 in sy No. 75lAAl12l1 application No. 2100064291 for an extent of Ac 0-23 Gts in sy No.75lAAl12l1 and application No. 2100064435 for an extent ol Ac 1-12 Gts in sy No 75tAAt12l2 thus in all Ac 3-15 Gts situated at Rudraram Village and Gram Panchayat, Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and also in not entering the names of the Petitioner in the integrated in Land records as per provisions of Bhu Bharti Record of Rights in Land Act 2025 as illegal and arbitrary consequently to direct the Respondents No. 2 to 4 to effect the mutation of the name of the Petitioner in respect of the above said land as per the applications made by the Petitioner IA 10F 20 Petition under Section 15i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No. 2 to 4 to effect mutation of the name of the petitioner in respect of the rands admeasuring as per the apprication apprication No. 2100103888 for an extent of Ac i-20 in sy No. 7srAAt12t1 apprication No. 2100064291 for an extent of Ac 0-23 Gts in sy No.7stAAt12ll and application No. 2100064435 for an extent of Ac 1-12 Gts in sy No. 75/AA/.12l2 thus in all Ac 3-15 Gts situated at Rudraram viilage g6 Gram panchayat, Shabad Mandar, Ranga Reddy District pending disposal of the above Writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SR|NIVAS VELAGAPUDT Counsel for the Respondents: SRI K. MAHESH, AGp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.37337 of 2O"5 Date: OS .12.20.25 Between: Mandadi Sri Harsha Babu And Petitioner The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Bhavan, Hvderabad and three others ORDER: .Respondents This writ Petition is filed praying this court to declare the action of respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not considering the online applications submitted by the petitioner seeking for mutation of his name in the revenue records and consequential issuance of e-pattadar passbook in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.1.2o guntas in Sy.No.75lA lL2/I; Ac.O.23 guntas in Sy.No.TSlAA/ 12/r and Ac.1.12 guntas in Sy.No.TS/AAlt2/2 of Rudraram village, Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and not entering the name of the petitioner in Bhu Bharati portal, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently, prayed for other appropriate reliefs. ) EVV. J \\'p-i73 37-2025 learned counsel for the

2. Heard Sri SriniVas Velagapudi' petit.ioner and Sri K'Mahesh' learned Assistant Gc'rvernment Plearler for Revenue aPpearlng for the resPondents anci with their consenr, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage' Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the 3. petitioner has made several online applications seeking to mutate the name of the petitioner in respect of the land admeasuring Ac'1'20 guntas in Sy'No'75/AAl12ll; Ac'0'23 guntas in Sy'No'75/ AAI 12l I and Ac' 1' 12 guntas in Sy.No.75/ AAI 12l2 of Rudraram Village' Shabad Mandal' Ranga Reddy District by paying requisite [ee' Learned counsel for the pet.itioner would further submit that' basing on the said applications,onlineslotbookingwasfixedseekingthepresence of the parties on 03'03 '2Oll at 11:00 a'm'; 08'03'2021 at 5:30 p.m. and 31.07'2O2L aL 12:30 p'm' Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the said applications were rejected by respondent No'4 except neither accePted nor Therefore, the Petitioner made a dodging the matter' 26.06.2025 before respondent No'3 Learnecl counsel for the petitioner representation, dated expressing his grievance 3 E\,'V, J Wp_37337_2025 would further submit that, even after receipt of the said representation also, no action is taken by the petitioner- Hence, having no other option, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking appropriate orders.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue would submit that the petitioner filed the present r,vrit petition after a lapse of four years and has not agitated the action of the respondent authorities at the earliest point of time. He would, however, submit that the official respondents, after conducting thorough enquiry on the applications submitted by the petitioner, would communicate the decision taken by respondent No.4, as expeditiously as possible.

5. Having considered the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and on perusal and examination of the material on record would disclose that the petitioner has already submitted online application seeking for mutation of his name and consequential issuance of pattadar passbook and slots have already been fixed in the year 2021 and thereafter, there is no communication to the petitioner on the status of the his applications. Under the above circumstances and since no communication to that effect -1 H\'\'. J 101i \\'n lfli" is given by respondent No-4, this court deems it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition, directing respondent No.4 to 'communicate the decision taken on the applications submitted by the petitioner, as expeditiousry as possible, preflerabry, n,ithin a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. with the above observations, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending. if any, shall stand closed. SD/.P. PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Bhavan, The State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Kongara Kalan 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Revenue Division, Chevella, Ranga Reddy District

4. The Tahsildar, Shabad tt/andal, Shabad, Ranga Reddy District. 5. One CC to SRI SRINIVAS VELAGAPUDI, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana.

7. Two CD Copies PVL BS \rr- € HIGH COURT DATED:05/1 212025 I ORDER WP.No.37337 of 2025 -.1-:j:X".lil-' t i.tE ;.i..i 'tjri'. f, m 'il 22 BEC t DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \c caljit'\ (r Ir\0t'r