High Court · 2025

3. The District Collector/ Election officer, Rangareddy District. 4. The Commissroner of Police (CP) Cyberabad, Commissionerate. 5. Jarupula Srinivas Naik @ Srinu, S/o. not known, aged about not known. Occ Special Branch Police Constable, PC No 2483, Amangal PS., Cyberabad Police Co m mrss io n e ra te.

6. Sabavath Srinu @ Sabavath Srinivas Naik, S/o. not known, aged about not known, OccPolice Constable, PC No 2B3l Police Station Amangal Cyberabad Police Commissionerate.

7. Vankadavath laxman Naik, S/o. Not known, Occ aged about not known, Occ Head Constable, HC No.50 Police Station Amangal, Cyberabad Police Commissionerate. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAIT/US By declaring the in action of the respondent no. 2 and 3 not taking any action on the Complaint dated 26-1 1-2025 given by the petitioner against the respondent no.S to 7 and not taking place to transfer of the respondent no.5 to 7 who are working since long years ir the same position at Amangal Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate to ccnduct the free and fair elections of the Grampanchayat Election schedule I eld on 17.11.2025 is illegal, arbitrary, and violation of Article 14 of Cons-itution of lndia and Consequently direct the Respondent No.2 and 3 to take :rction on application d|.26.11.2025 which was given by the petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the (;ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co:rl may be pleased to drrect the ResponCent No.2 and 3 to take action on apJ li:ation d1.26.11.2025 which was given by the petitioner, pending disposal of the rn,:in writ petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOGILI ANAVENI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR PANCHAYAT ll,qJ RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI P.SREEDHAR RAC, SC FOR TGSEC Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.4: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER ,.mimF .r/ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI IVRIT PETITION No .37306 0F 2025 DATE: OA.L2.2O2S Between: Vislavath Kalyan Naik ...Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Rep.by its principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Hyderabad & 6 others ...Respondents ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of respondents No.2 & 3 in taking action on his complaint df .26.I7.2025 to transfer respondents No.S to 7 from the concerned Police Stations during Eiections to the concerned Gram panchayats.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj appearing for respondent No.l,, Sri P.Sreedhar Rao, learned Standing counsel for State Election Commission appearing for respondent No.2, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent No.3, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent No.4 . 2

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner sr bmitted that sth respondent is working as Police Constable and or e of the contestant of Shankerkunta Tanda is a relative of 5th resporLdent. Therefore, there rs a chance of undue influcnce being used i r these Elections +. Learned Government Pleader for Homc on instructions submittecl that there is no such relationship lretween the Sth I : respondent with any of the contestant. Exct:1tt 5'. respondent, respondents No.6 and 7 do not belong to t 1 I same District. llowcvcr, learned counscl for thc petitioner re fuse.l thc same

5. Learned Standing Counsei for State Ble t tion Commission submitted that no complaint l-ras been r€C€.iv'rld by the State triection Commission and if any such comlrllsnl is received before conduct of trlections, action will be tal<re itr accordance rvith the guidclines for Conduct of trlections 6- In view ol-the submission of the learned counscl appearing for the 2"d respondent, since it is thc duty of the rc,qllondent No.2 Jo look into the complaints relating to the Elections. :tris Court permits the petitioner to make a fresh representation to the respondent No.2, rvho shall consider the same in accordalce r,,ith the guidelines for Conduct of Gram Panchayat Elections, exl,editiously, before conduct of Elections. 3

7. With the above direction, this Writ petition is disposed of. There sha11 be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SDIP. PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,/: (, SECTION OFFICER To, 'l . The Principal Secretary, Panchayathraj Department, Hyderabad, State of Telangana.

2. The Commissioner, Telangana State Election Commission, 1st floor DTCP Building Opp. PTI Building, AC Guards, ft4asabtank, Hyderabad,

3. The District Collector/ Election officer, Rangareddy District. 4. The Commissioner of Police (CP) Cyberabad, Commissionerate.. 5. One CC to SRI MOGILI ANAVENI, Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to SRI P.SREEDHAR RAO, SC FOR TGSEC IOPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

8. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

9. Two CCs to GP FOR HOII/E, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

10. Two CD Copies BSR tui,, BS I I I I HIGH COURT DATED:0811212025 CC TODAY It----.4-' ,.;j'6( \;-- ..-.i.Q t! -.- | ,::: aEo IL .s\ ,$t -e-!-r (i:,' ( a, \" )i\ r:i .!li;r .a? ORDER WP-No.37306 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS \5 1 a,