One CC to SRI v. ROOPESH KUMAR REDDY

12. Srirama Vattamwar, Board of Director, Flat no 8601 , S: Ameerpet, Hyderabad, Telangana 500073. itaire Heights, 1 3 Gaddam Srinivas, Board of Director, Flat no B'1007, S<,1 Ameerpet, Hyderabad, Telangana 500073. aire Heights,

14. Sandhya Jain, Board of Director, Flat no 8717, Solitair: Hyderabad, Telangana 500073. leights, Ameerpet, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lnrl r praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, th( High Court may be pleased to issue a Wril or Order, more particularly one ir he nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring that Respondent Nos. 4 to 14 hz r -. incurred automatic statutory disqualification under Section 21(6Xb) & (c) of he TMACS Act and Clause 32(F) of the certified Bye-laws of the Responden \,1o.3 society, further declare all actions, resolutions, circulars, administrativr, measures, financial decisions, vendor approvals, and communications issued t ) the said disqualified Committee from the statutory disqu alif icatron date as illega, arbitrary, ultra vires, void ab initio and unenforceable in law and consequently i-ect the Respondent No.2, to assume charge of Respondent No.3 Society zrj appoint a neutral Administrator or Elders' Counsil to manage the affairs ol the Society until a laMully constituted Managing Committee is elected. lA NO: 1 OF 202s Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c r umstances stated in the effidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou' may be pleased to suspend all resolutions. circulars, decisions, administrative I ctions, and financial transactions issued or undertaken by the statutorily c i qualified Managing Committee of Respondent No. 3 Society, i.e., Responder t Nos. 4 to 14. after crossing the statutory deadline of disqualification dat€ i 30.09.2025, and consequently restrain Respondent Nos. 4 to 14 frcm furth 3 interfering with the administration, finances. or day-to-day functioning of Resp I dent No. 3 Society. pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. ROOPESH KUMAR REDI) / Counsel for the Respondents Nos. 1 &2: GP FOR COOPEFT .TION Counsel for the Respondents Nos.3 to 14: - - - The Court made the following: ORDER / IN'TItti IIIGH COURT FOIT'THII STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TIIT], IION'BI,I] SNI'I" JT]S'[ICE T. MADHAVT DEVI WRI'I PETITION No.37254 of 2025 Date 17.12.2025 Betrveen: G. Sliva ni AND .. Petitioner The State Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Seoretaly, Coopcrative Societies, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad and thirleen others . . Respondents ORDER 'l'his Writ Petition is Iiled seeking the following reliet '' ... to issue a ll/rit or Order, ntore particularly one in the nalurc o.f l'l'rit of'lvfondamus b.v dcclttring that Respondent Nos. 4 to ]4 havc irtcurted oulomati( slulutotl' d isqualilication under Section 2 t(6)(b) and (c) ol' rhe '|MACS Act and Clause 32(F) of the cartifietl Byc-laws of the llcspondent No.3 sociely, lirther declare all actiotts. resoluti<tns, circuktrs, administralivc measures, linancial decisions, vendor approvals, and communications issued by the said disqualiJicd Commiltcc from the statltlory I'1 Jisqrulitication datc as illegal, arbitrant, ultra vires, wsid ab initio ttnd unenforceablc in law,and consequently direct the Responclenl .tlVIDJ \tn 7'7254 2025 2 No.), to trssuntc clmrge o/ llcspondent No.J Socit'l ltd dppoint a tteutr,tl .4dnti strdtor or l',ldcrs' Counsil to ntatu,, r tfu olfairs of tlrc So<'iat.v trttlil a lutl llv ()n.\tilul{'d illctrrtgrtt.' ('onlniitl(' ts clcctL'l u ttcl po.rs... "

2. Learncd counscl lor thc petitioncr subl itted that the rcspondents havc not conducted the (ieneral 13r 1v Meeting as rnandated under the provisions ol' the 'l clangana ,4utually Aided ('o-Opcrativc Societics. Act, 1995 (fbr sho11, ' lhe Act") and llrcrefore, they arc liable to bc disqualilred. l'herelore, the l)clitioner ancl othcls have subnrittcd a reprcsentat t( | on 22.11.2025 an(l when no action was takcn thereon, the peti ;rner subrritted another repl'csentation on 01.12.2025 requesting I l an irnrncdiate cn(luiry in the l\4anagcnlcnt Conrlrittee Ibr violari rn ol' bye-laws an(l the Act and to stay election scheduled on 07.1. . l()25 as well as to disqualily the Managing Cornnrittee of respondt r t No.3-society. [-carned counsel lor the pctitioner therelore seeks I lirection to the lcspondents to consiclcr the rcpresentations daterl '. 2.1 L2025 and also 01.12.2025 and to hotd that thc unolficial r.spondents are disclualified lrom being members of the Managin _: Committee of rcspondent No.3-socicty. I I l 'l Mt)J wp 17251 2025 3

3. Lcarncd Governrrcrtt Pleadcr for Coopcration, appearing fbr responclents No.l & 2, subrnitted that the said representations would bc considercd bv thc authorities

4. In view thereof, this Courl deems it tit and proper to dispose of this Wlit Petition at tlie adrnission stagc, with a direction to respondent No.2 to considcr the t'eplescn tations ol the pctitioner dated 22.1 1.2025 and 01.12.2025 and to take action in accordance with law, aftcr issuing noticcs to all thc conccrned, il necessary.

5. With the abovc dilcctions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs

6.. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/.P.PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary (Co-operative Societies), Secretariat building, Hyderabad 500002.

2. The Regiskar / District Cooperative Officer, Hyderabad District, Near Niloufer Hospital, Red Hills, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad, Telangana 500004. 3. One CC to SRI V. ROOPESH KUMAR REDDY, Advocate IOPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP FOR COOPERATION, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad . [OUT] l{u u. Two CD Copies SPMK.TPMK HIGH COURT DATED:1711212025 ORDER WP.No.37254 ot 2025 \\ : sTAr6 ( o o I\1 I[\ I\1t ,-?t, r i; r ,:pAI (t .i i DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS .: J i i I I 1 \7 'Ll2