Sri Linga Jaya Reddy v. The State of Telangana

7. Boddol Vinoda, Wo. Narsimha Reddy Aged major, Occ. Business, Rl/o. H No. 1-306 Kongara kalan Village, lbrahimpatnam Mandal Ranga Reddy District 8. Kalvakuntla Uma Jayasri, W/o. Upender Reddy Aged major, Rt/o. H No. 1- 504, Kongara kalan Village, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy Districl 9. Gummalla Srinivas Reddy, S/o. Late G.Mohan Reddy Aged about 57 years, Occ agriculture, F/o. H No. 8-1 12, Kongara Khurd, Raviryal, Ranga Reddy District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Atticle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction as more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents No. 2 to 4 in not considering my oblection application dt. 03.11.2025, as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of Constitution of lndia and consequently Direct the responder s no.2 to 4 not to grant any mutation proceedings claiming through succes: i rn in favour of the unofficial respondents 5 to 8 basing on the applications made online vide application Nos. RC2500006195 and RC2500006196 dat,d 30.07.2025 and RC2500007563, RC2500007564, RC2500007565 & :32500007566' dt. 01 .O9.2025, in the interest of justice. lA NO: 'f OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circ lmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Courl may be pleased to Direct the respondents 2 to 4 to stay of all the further procet:' ings in applications made online vide application Nos. RC2500006195 and F( 2500006196 dated 3O.O7.2025 and RC2500007563, RC2500007564, 1C2s00007565 & RC2500007566, dt 01.09.2025 and general notices dt. Og.C) 2025, pursuant to the ontine applications dt. 30.07.2025 and 01.09.2025, penri tg disposal of main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI DAMMALAPATI SRINIVAS, S R. COUNSEL REP. FOR Ms. PILLIX LAW FlRl/l Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 to 4: SRI K. MAHESH, ASST. GP FOR REVI NUE Counsel for the Respondent No-S to 9: - - - - The Court made the following: OROER IN THE HIGH COURT F.OR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT ITYDERABAI) THE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAI WRIT PETITION No.37269 of 2o25 Dated: o5.12.2o.25 Between: Sri Linga Jaya Reddy Petitioner And The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary and eight others .. . Respondents ORDER This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- "... to rssue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the naturc of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents No.2 to 4 in not considering my objection application dt.03. 11.2025, as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14 and 3O0-A of Constitution of India and consequently Direct the respondents no.2 to 4 not to gant any mutation proceedings claiming through succession in favour of the unofficral respondents 5 to 8 basing on the applications made online vide application Nos.RC2500006195 artd RC2500006196 dated 30.O7.2025 and RC2500O07563, RC2500007564, RC2500007565 & RC2500007566 dt.Ol .O9.2O25, in the interest of justice and to pass such othcr or orders . .. "

2. Heard Mr. Dammalapati Srinivas, learned senior counsel representing Ms.Pillix Law Firm for the pelitioner and Mr. K. Mahesh, learned Assistant Government pleader for 2 Revenue representing learned Government Plea'l :r for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.l to 4. Perused the ecord.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner sull nits that the unofficial respondent Nos.S to 8 have filed on-li re applications bearing Nos.RC2500007563, RC250O0O7564, R(l 2500007565 & RC2500007566 dated O1.O9.2025 seeking to mu:r .te their names in the revenue records with regard to the prc certy obtained through succession; that the petitioner has filed a representation before respondent No.4/Tahsildar requestinll him not to entertain any succession proceedings in favour < f third parties, without cherllenging the existing succession prc< :edrngs in File No.D/ 3a00/2005 dated 27 . rO.2006.

4. He further contends that a civil suit vid'l O.S.No. 139 of 2025 filed try the petitioner for the relief of Speci ic Performance is pending adjudication on the Ille of the learnet XV Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at Ibral impatnam (for short, "the trial Court"); that vide order datec. O2.O7.2025 in I.A.No.674 of 2025 the trial Court had gra:r -ed ad-interim Injunction restraining the defendants from inter ering with the suit schedule property. 3

5. He submits that the petitioner has flled W.P.No.26676 of 2025 before this Court. Vide order dated 08.09.2025 this Court directed as follows:- . "Pending further orders, there shall be interim direction to the respondent No.4 not to entertain any document for registration presented by the unofhcial respondent Nos.7 to 9 in connection with the petitioner's agricultural lands/ residential plots situated in Sy.No.98 (as per Village Map 479) admeasuring Ac.20-00 gr.rntas and Sy.No.99 (as per Village Map 480) admeasuring Ac.19 20 guntas, total admeasuring Ac.39-2O guntas situated at Kongara Khurd (A) Village, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District in view of the injunction order dated O2.O7.2O25 passed in I.A.No.674 of 2025 in O.S.No.139 of 2025 on the file of XV Additional District and Sessions Judge, RangaReddy District, at Ibrahimpatnam." Therefore, he contends that if the official respondents act upon the on-line applications submitted by unofficial respondent Nos.5 to 8 the valuable right of the petitioner under Article 300 of Constitution of India would be infringed and hence, seeks to pass appropriate orders.

6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue states that the case of the petitioner is under consideration and upon \ examining the .eprese.rtation dated 03.11.2025 submitted by the petitioner, appropriate orders would be passed on the on-line applications submitted by unoffrcial respondent Nos.S to 8. Stating thus, he seeks to dismiss the Writ Petition. 4 7 . Having regard to the submissions of bo h the learned counsel and on perusal of the materiai availabk: on record, this Court, without making any observations on the merits or demerits of the case, deems it appropriate to d i ect the ofhcial respondent No.4 to examine the repres l rtation dated

03.1,7.2025 submitted by the petitioner and pz ss appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law, by issui-r 3 notices to all the interested parties and affording them suffic t nt opportunit5r of hearing. Since, notice is directed to be rssu: I on unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 9 further service of notice r-1 on respondent Nos.6 to 9 stands dispensed with.

8. With the above direction this Writ Petitior is disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shal stand closed. Sd/.t .PONNA KRISHNA ASSSIS TANT REGISTRARrV / iECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY' To, Secretariat, Hyderabad - 5O0 022 1 . The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, The Stakr 2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, offlce at Kon( 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukuru Division, Rar 1 4. The Tahsildar, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distt 5. One CC to SRI PILLIX LAW FIRM, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the Stati)

7. Two CD Copies rf Telangana, arakalan - 501 510 a Reddy Diskict rf Telangana BN BS HIGH COURT DATED:05 t12t2O2S ORDER WP.No.37269 of 2025 /,. / '\ i1,i' t-) a: :.) i-_ ..,t, 'u./2, \ ,lrl' -l-,-"\ ') \. .\ ,- 5 lii C m5 l1,rr,,116.r . - \:-t:-:---,' _-. DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS o (