The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records pertaining to PRC No. 508/2025 pending on the file of the Hon'ble lVth Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Nampally and quash the same against the Petitioner/Accused. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in PRC No. 50812025 pending on the file of the Hon'ble lVth Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Nampally pending disposal of the present Criminal Petition. I.A.Nos.3 and 4 ot 2025 l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between Vasavi Latha, D/o Ch. Venkata Satya Narayan a, Age - 2.1 Employee, R/o H No. 1-66/4, l st Ward, Seethamp-et, Krl Dendaluru Mandal, Eluru District, Andhra Pradesh - 5342; years, Occ. Prrvate l-rag udem, ...RespondenUDe lacto Complainant AND 1 Das_a_gan i Hareesh, S/o. Late.D. Krishna, Age 29 year , Occ. Dy Manager 'Vi1 : ,,r Laxmi Nrlayam, !n RBL Bank, R/o. H.No.1t-3-267 t41 anld 40, lV'lad huranaga r,. Colony, Parsigutta, Secunderabj: N/o. H trto 2-lg, Ramrajupally, (V) Devuruppata (M), Jangaon District, 1:langana State. . ..1) rtitio ners/Acc used 2. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its public prosecuto . High Court for the State of Telangana, At Hyderabad. ...Respc ndenURespondent Petition under Section 359 (6) of BNSS praying that i-. the crrcumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition. tr,3 High court may be pleased to permit the petitioners and record compromise: and quash in pRC No 508/2025 pending on the file of the Hon'ble lvth Addit rnat chief Judicial Magistrate at Nampally by allowing the criminal petition, in firr interest of justice. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359 (2) of BNSS praying that ir the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition. tre High court may be pleased to record compromise and quash in pRC No 5t 3/2025 pending o. the file of the Hon'ble lVth Additional chief Judicial Magistr rle at Nampally by allowing the Criminal Petition, in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing le: lVlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing ler arguments of Sri Ramdas B ,Advocate for the Petitioner and sri Jithenc r r Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respor r e:nt No.1 and of Sri Kondeti Ranjith Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent No 2 The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER 7 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2o25 IN AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.16078 of 2025 Datez L6.12.2O25 Between : Dasagani Hareesh. AND . . Pc titioner/ Accused The State of Telangana represented by its Public Prosecutor and another. ....Respondents COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been hled by the petitioner,/ accused seeking to quash the proceedings in PRC.No.5O8 ot 2025 on the hie of IV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nampally.

2. Heard Mr. B.Ramdas, learned counsel for the petitioner, IMr. Kondeti Ranjith Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and Mr. Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1-State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during the pendency of the present Criminal Petition, at the instance of the well wishers, relatives and elders, the parties have settled the 2 disputes pending between them arld entered into c< mpromise and filed Joint Compromise Memo. Accordingly, the pzt ties have flled [.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 seeking permission to < r rnpromise the matter and to record the compromise entered betu,e.e r the m.

4. This Court uide order, dated 05.12.2025, dire c -,:d the parties i.e., lhc petitioner and respondent No.2, to appear l <:fore the High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, )n or before 12.12.2025. In compliance of the said order, tht: l,<:cretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has submittccl report, dated

11.12.2025, stating that the petitioner, and rcspon l,:nt No.2 wcre dul1' identified rvith copies of their Aadhar Carrl:; It is further stated that thc parties have willfutly and w,ithr>r.t any coercion entered into compromise.

5. In view of the said report and also in view of i l^re (:ompromise entered between the petitioner and respondent No I as u,ell as the submissions made by the respective parties, I.A.Nos. ] an<j 4 of 2O2S are allowed. Consequently, the proceedings in pR(t \o.50U ol 2025 on the file of IV Additional Chief Judicial Magistratr , Nampally, are hereby quashed against the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allo u ed, subject to payment of costs of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thor.rr; Lncl only) to the High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad rnd Rs.S,OOO/ _ J (Rupees five thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, by the petitioner, within one week from today Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/. MOHD.ISMAIL DEPUTY REGIST //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 3 4 5 6 The lV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Namp Hyderabad The Station House Officer, Nallakunta Police Station, Hyderabad Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] One CC to Sri Ramdas B, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri Kondeti Ranjith Reddy, Advocate IOPUCI Two CD Copies AtsK/PSL Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise Note: Total Amount of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri Ramdas B, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 16.12.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana" and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 152697 of 2025 and Receipt No. 030 dated 24-12-2025. I HIGH COURT DATED: 1611212025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ol 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.16078 ot 2025 'r 1t 0 ff IJ n t c) () ,,.:). \: ';1,-.:(* 'a'. I t$ 'i,)' ALLOWING THE l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 AND THE CRIMINAL PETITION ( 1) \w 7 rN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDrcaTt'*'-T9* THE STATE oF TELANGANA AT: HYDERABAD of 2025 Crl'M'P'No' Crl.P.No. Dasaganr Hareesh The State of Telangana and another 1q AND of 2025 ...Petitioner/ Accused ... ResPondent/ ResPondents JO INT MEMooFCOMP ROMISE ComPlainant most ThePetitioners/AccusedandRespondent/De-facto respectfullY submit as follows: l. The de facto complainant lodged a report before the Thatlada Police Station' which was registered in Crime No' 229 of 2025 oo the frle of P'S Nallakr-rnta for Offences U/s' 69 of BNS and the same was later registered as PRC No' 5C)812025 pending on the frle of the Honlcle IVth Additional Chief Jud'icial Magistrate at NamPallY'

2. The petitioner and trre Respondent No. 2 submit that the dispute arose o,t o[ a personar misunderstanding between the parties' With the intervention of elders and mutual friends ald both family members' the parties have amicably resolved their differences'

3. The de facto complainant has no objection to the quashing of the said proceedings' and both parties have entered into this Ch.VCSGV( Lo-dra \'\ compromlsc vo lu lt taril-\r, infl lte nce . tt'ithoul an3r force, r;ercion, or unclue llcncc. rltc pctitiont:r- ;lnd Rcs-ltonclerrt No. 2 i,r r)tl-\. request this Hon'ble Cour-t to br: plcascd to quash thc procc,_-,j ngs ir.l Crime No. 229 ol 2025 on rlrc lllc ol p.S Nallakunra for Offcrr: rs U/s. 69 of BNS arld the sanle rr as latcr. r.egistered as pRC No. 5()it ,202.5 pending on the filc rr- tr-re IJorr'ble IVth Acrditionar chiet Juc: i rial Magistrate at Nampall-r. ir-r tlte in tere s t ofjLlstice Wlrcrefore_ it is h.nrlt[-1, pra_ved that this Hon,ble Co- i-t ma-\1 br: pleased to takc this Joilrr Memo of Compromise on r:cord ald pass appropriate orders qr-rashing the proceedings in the ;:ove crime. Place: H.1'derabad PETITIONEI?/A CUSED ch.voso.v, L a U-ra RESPONDENT No. 2/ DEFA(] t ] CoMPT.AINANT Counsel for the p<. r tio ners / Acc used Ch '\/ l€avf L.-U:O Respondent No. 2 / De .; t:to Complainant . Vasavi Latha