The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Writs more appropriately a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in trying to interfere into the construction activities and threatening to demolish ongoing construction in plot nos. 12 and 13 situated at Survey No. 115 of Puppalguda Village, Gandipet (M) Mandal, Ranga Reddy District to an extent of 667.96 Sq. without issuing any notice , proceedings and without following due process of law as contemplated under the provisions of law as illegal, void, ultra virus, unconstitutio nal and in violations of the principles of Natural Justice and contrary to the provisions of The Telangana Municipalities Act, 2019 in the interest of justice and equity. -_-g lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petttion under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the (;i':umslances stated in the affidav t filed in support of the petition, the High Court rrir'7 be :leased to direct the Respondent Nos. 11. 3 and their cfficial not to demolish lre pe,itioner property in Plot Nos. 12 and 13 situated at Survey No. 'l 15 of Puppalt 1..da Village, Gandipet (l\,/) IManCal, Ranga Reddy District, T G. Pending disposal cf tl're wr t petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ()lrrumsrances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nr:ry be p,leased to direct the Respondent Nos. 2.3 and their officiai not to i:tt-.rfen: into ongoing construction ir-r Plot rros. 12 and 13 situated at Survey N I 1 1fj of Puppalguda Village, Gandipet (lt/) ti/andal, Ranga Reddy District, T.G c.,ndin.; disposal of the wnt petition in the interest of lustice and equity. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MD ABDUL MATEEN QURf:SHl Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADI/tINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVE LOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI LAXMAIAH KANCHA.NI, S.C. FOR MUNICIPAI-ITIES counsel for the Respondent No.3: sRI v. NARSIMHA GOU D, S.C. FOR HMDA The Court made the following: ORDER TN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT TIYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE, Szu JUSTICE B. VTJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITO N No.37140 OF 2025 DATE OF ORDER: 03-12-2025 Between: Mr. Moharnmcd Mujeed IJR Rahaman ANI) ... Petitioner The State of Tclangana Rep. By its Principal Secretary, Municipal Adrninistration and Urban Devclopment Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. and two 11) others. . Respondents ORDER:(ORAL) This writ petition is fited by the petitioner seeking to declare the action of respondent Nos.2 and 3 in interlering with his construction activity and threatening to demolish the ongoing construction in the PIot Nos.l2 and 13 admeasuring 667.96 square yards in Survey No.l15 of the Puppalaguda Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as being iltegal and arbitrary. 2 vJ.P. rro.i7140 012025 I tate 03. I 2.2025 2. Hcard Mr. Md. Abdul Matecr-L Qureshi. lcarn,:rl cotLnsel for the petitioner, Mr. Laxn-raiah Kanchani, leamed srandingt counsel for responderrt No.?. and IVlr. V. Narsimha Goird, lc rrncd jtnaidng counse I lor the [{MDA, appearing firr rcspondent No 3.

3. Leamed standing counsel fbr respondent No.l s-rbnritted tliat shorr,-cause notice y'ide No.G I i-f I)S/LIC/l\{AN I.- '006 I I I i2025 dated 21.11.2025 has bcen issued to thc petitioner under Section 178 of thc Telangana Municipalities Act 2019 read r,.irh Scction 23 of the l{yderabad Metropolitan Development Autht,rity Act 200g, as tlre pctitioner obtained building pennission lor r onstrtLction of Stilt lbr parking + five (5) upper floors, but procc,'cling with the constrLlction ol ccllar + ground floor tvithotrt mlrintaining mandatory setbacks in the subjcct propefty

4. A copy of show-cause notice dated 21.1 1.20: ) is s,:rved on the learned counsel fbr the petitioner

5. In vie,'v of the same, the writ petition IS disp,tsed of, directing the petitioner to submit reply to the sho,r.cause notice t,icle No.Gl/|PS/[ICA4ANK/00631112025 darerl T..ll.2OZ5 W.P. No.i7140 of 2025 Date O3.12.2025 within a period of seven (7) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is also directed not to make any construction in deviation ol thc buitding permit order dated

17.12.2024. Respondent N-o.2 is directed not to interfere with the constmction activity undertaken by the petitioner in the property bearing Plot Nos.l2 and 13 admeasuring 667.96 square yards in Survey No.l l5 of the Puppataguda Vitlage, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in accordance with the sanctioned plan Further, this order shall not come in the way of respondent No.2 in stopping the construction undertaken by the petitioner in the subject property in deviation of the sanctioned plan. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, il any, pending in the writ pctition stand closed. I Sd/.U.SUDHA TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER eddy Diskict, T.G The Commissioner, Manikonda Municipality, Rang one cc to SRI Ir/D ABDUL TUATEEN QURESHI, Advocate [oPUC] Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] One CC to SRI LAXMAIAH KANCHANI, S.C for Municipalities [OPUC] One CC to SRI V. NARSIMHA GOUD, S.C. for HMDA [OPUC] Two CD Copies To 1 2 ? 4 ^ t) MP PMK CC TODAY HIGH COURT DAT E:D:0311212025 v FT ORDER WP.No.37140 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE \IfRIT PETITION wH-f,-rouT cosTs I ^