High Court · 2025

KL SALOON AND SPA, Rep by Pirangolla .Naresh' S/o -busines"s, o/o Flat No 301' Greenhood -Late^Pirangolla iJrrt."ni.] u"a, kk* 6on*ntion. padmasri Hills, Suncity Bandlaguda, Bbndalguda Jagir, Ranga Reddy District ...PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Telangana, ReP Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad by its Prl Secretary, Home Department

2. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate' Hyderabad 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate 4. The Station House Officer, Bandlaguda Police Station' Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS.. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more preferably one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the impugned notification no (L&O)/M4/314O\2O1O ' dated 30 06'2025 passed by the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary' discriminatory' violative of Article 14, 19 (f ) (g) of the constitution of lndia, contrary to the provisions of the HyderabadCityPoliceAct'l34BFasliandconsequentlysetasidethesame against the petitioner, in the interest of justice' lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the r ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou i may be pleased to suspenfihe impugned notification No. (L&O)/N/a/31401201 ), dated 30.06.2010 passed by the 2nd respondent against the petitioner, pel lrng disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T.S.N.MURTHY Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT ITYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KIIMAR WRIT PETITION No.371 88 of 2O25 Date: 11.12.2o25 Between: KL Saloon and Spa, Rep. by Pirangolla Naresh. AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and three others. ...Petitioner ...Respondents ORDER: Heard Iearned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Homc appearing for the respondents.

2. This writ petition is filed seeking following reliel- "...pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent impugned notification issuing no. (L&O)/M4l3140l2OlO, dated 30.06.2025 1 the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary, discri violative of Article 14, 19 (1) (g) of the Const India, contrary to the provisions of the Hyde- Police Act 1 348 Fasli and consequently se t same against the petitioner, in the interest of .rt grant such other necessary relief as this Ho r may deem fit and proper in the circumstar< case..." assed by ninatory, tution of Lbad City rside the stice and r1e Court es of the

3. Today, when the matter is taken up for h : rring, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in simila- c ircLtmst:rnces, this Court disposed of uide order dated 2 3.09.202 I in W.P.No.16281 ol 2O1O and batch, the conclusive p< rtion of u'hich reads as under:- "3. In uieu of the submissions o/ leanted ct rr:tsel for both sides, these Writ Petitions are disposed t1 ht terms of order dated 04.02.2021 in I.A.No.1 oJ 2O2O in W.P.No.24410 of 2020, permitting the petition< "s to tutl the massage centres, subject to maintoininq rr "ecord irt the register to be maintained bg the massal ; centres containing the dates of uisits of the custor t :rs, their names and uerifiable addresses together uith ., te phone numbers, so as lo enable the police to conta,: them on the aspect of oruner/ manager/ operator of the massage . tntrc,s to prouide for the help from the opposite sex. I urtler, it shall be open to ang police officer not belotu tl e rank oJ a Sub-Inspector of Police ottached to any po,i et stotion to ueifg once in a uhile such records maintoir zd bg the massage centres and he shall also be at libert.' to uerify as to whether the partianlar anstomer hzs -scl :ited any such special seruice from the massage centre ( ' not. It is also open to the police to take appropn( t-e- actiort depending upon the result of ang such uenfit ttion and request t I I \ also considering the fact that whether the cross massage seruice prouided to the anstomers is in professional manner or not. Police are also entttled to inuestigate into cimes, tf ang, reported against the petitioners. Petitioners are also directed not to keep the main door of the premises closed, duing the working hours. Subject to these conditions, the petitioners maA be pennitted to carry on the business, dulg taking all necessary and proper precautions to ensure that no incident of immoral actiuitA is carned on under the guise of prouiding uhole body massage. Miscellaneous petitions pending in all the Wit Petitions, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. "

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further prayed this Court to pass similar orders as passed in the order dated 28.09.2021 in W.P.No.1628I of 2O1O and batch in the present writ petition also.

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents did not dispute the said submission

6. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side and in view of order dated 28.09.2021 passed by this Court in W.P.No.L628l of 2010 and batch, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities to take action in terms of the notification, dated 30.06.2025, and the ( common order dated 28.O9.2021 passed in W.P.No.1628l of 2OlO and batch. 7 . It is made clear that this order would n c t preclude the respondent authorities to take appropriate acti,r r against the petitioner, if the petitioner fails to comply witl-r :he directions issued by this Court uide order dated 28.09.2021 in W.p.No.16281 of 2010 and batch.

8. It is needless to say that the petitioner sha1l [,llorv the order dated 28.09.202 1 passed by this Court in W.p.No. 621l ot 201O ald batch.

9. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. \o order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in th s r.r-rit petition shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/. A. SSIS SRINIVASA REDDY rANT REG_lqIRAtr SECTION OFFICER To, 1 The Prl Secretary, Home Department Secreta atB ild r gs, HYderabad, State of Telangana

2. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commissiort rate' Hyderabad 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police' Rachakonda Co rmissionerate 4.TheStationHouseOfficer,BandlagudaPoliceStation'tyderabad 5. One CC to SRI T.S.N'MURTHY' Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the { tate of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD CoPies 7 BSR GJP \ I HIGH COURT DATED: 1111212025 ORDER WP.No.37188 of 2025 ----a ..^ -. - th:;" ) A 1 'r [tr] -h -^.... - * -'ri. '..1 ., ,r ,'t"11'..1 { DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS o\ L9