Smt. Modiyam Venkayamma v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents No. 2 to 4 in not regularizing the petitioner's Sadabainama Document dated 26.11.201O after receipt of the online application No. R0S022003016899 vide Recept No. AA 4711259 dated 29.10.2020 of the petitioner under scheme of purification of revenue records and keep on pending the online application of the petitioner for the last five years and not regularizing the Sada Bynama document of the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of lndia and consequently Direct the respondent No. 2 to 4 to regularize the petitioner Sada Bynama document by considering the online application dated 29.10.2020 of the petitioner in the interest of justice I i I I t i i lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Direct the Respondents No. 2 to 4 to regularize the document of the petitioner i.e., Sadabainama dated 26.11 .2010 by considering the Form 1 0 online application No. ROS022003016899 vide Receipt N<i. AA 4T112Sg dated 29.1o.2020 of the petitioner, pending disposal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. PENUBALLI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondents: SRI K. MAHESH, AGp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER :-i IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.37241 of 2O25 Dated: O5.L2.2O25 Between: Smt. Modiyam Venkayamma ... Petitioner The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary and three others . Respondents And ORDER This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- "... to issue a Writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents No.2 to 4 in not regularizing the petitioner's Sadabainama Document dated 26.L1.2O10 after receipt of the online application No.ROSO22003016899 vide Receipt No.AA 47L1259 dated 29.10.2020 of the petitioner under scheme of purilication of revenue records and keep on pending the online application of the petitioner for the last five years and not regularizing the Sada Bynama document of the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14, 19,21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently Direct the respondent No.2 to 4 to regularize the petitioner Sada Bynama document by considering the online application dated 29.1O.2O2O of the petitioner in the interest of justice and to pass such other order or orders ---" 2 Heard Mr.Penuballi Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Mahesh, learned Assistant Government 2 Pleader for Revenue representing learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing lbr respondents. Perused the record

3. When the matter is taken up for consideration, iearned counsel for the petitioner seeks a di,'ection t.t official respondent Nos.2 to 4 to consider and pass appropriate or'ders on the on-line application No.ROSO22OO3O16899 dated 29.lO.2O2O submitted by the petitioner requesting to regtilarize the Sada Bainama Document dated 26.11.2010 submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue by filing the 'uvritten instructions addressed to the learned Government Pleader for Revenue by the respondent No.4, submits that, upon enquiry of the Sada Bainama application submitted by the petitioner, Sri Bheri Veerraju, who is mentioned as vendor in the writ affidavit, has not given consent to regularize the land admeasuring Acs.1O.O0 gts in Sy.No.Lg7 /Lu situated at Asupaka Revenue Village in favour of petitioner and further stated that he has never sold the subject land to any one; that the neighbouring farmers also stated that the said land is under cultivation of Sri Bheri Veerraju and that 2 the petitfoner never cultivated the said land at any point of time; i I t I that the said on-line application is already disposed of as per 3 Rules. Therefore, he seeks to dismiss the Writ Petition.

5. Mr.Chandra Mohan, iearned counsel submits that he intends to appear on behalf of the vendor of the petitioner's land and that the vendor is not maCe as party to the Writ Petition.

6. Having regard to the submissions of all the learned counsel this Court, without making any observations on the merits or demerits of the case, deems it appropriate to.direct respondent No.4 to communicate the decision arrived at on the on-line application to the petitioner herein, r,vithin a period of thirty (3O) days from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.

7. With the above direction this Writ Petition is disposed of. Need,less to mention, the petitioner is granted liberty to work out the remedies as available under law. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/.S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO REGISTRAR ASSI \ To, /TRUE COPY// N OFFICER Kothagudem District

1. The Prl secretary, Rev_enue Department Secretariat, T.S,Hyderabad 2. The District collector, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, Kothigudem : 3. The Revenue Divisional officer, Kothagudem Division, Bhadladri 4. The Tahsildar lSub Registrar, Ashwaraopeta Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem 5. One CC to SRl. PENUBALLI RAMESH BABU, Advocate tOpUCI 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Tel6ngana at 7. Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUT] Distric BIU GJPv HIGH COURT DATED:05/1 212025 ORDER WP.No.37241 of 2025 r''. ). 1B IL u zui r l). \r\ /.>. ._,,*.,: .\.: :./ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS I i I ! t I I I Il I q Il 6I t I i f E $ E !- E f i , I I , I t , } T t :-i