High Court · 2025

petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF IVIANDAIVIUS declaring the action of 3rd and 4th respondents in not providing police aid on my representation dated 22.11.2025 and also not implementing Police Aid order granted on 06.02.2018 in l.A.No. 57 of 2018 in O.S.No.405 of 2016 on the file of Sdb-Divisional Magistrate (tMobile Court) at Bhadrachalam for harvesting my crops in my Iand of Ac. 10.42 cents and covered by RS Nos. 116t45 and 11611t36 situated in Rachannagudem Revenue Villageof tvlulakalampalli Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District as illegal, irregular, irrational and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondent to implement said police aid order. lA NO: 1 oF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to consider my representation dated 22.11.2025 and implement the Police Aid Order granted on 25.03.2O11 in on 06.02.2018 in l.A.No. 57 of 2018 in O.S.No.405 of 20'16 on the file of Sub- Divisional Magistrate (tt/obile Court) at Bhadrachalam for harvesting my crops in my land of Ac. 10.42 cents and covered by RS Nos. 116145 and 1 1611136 situated in Rachannagudem Revenue Village of Mulakalampalli Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI PANGA SIVANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: ASST. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER o IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELAITTGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR DATE OF ORDER: 10.lz.z0i?s o.3 6 Between: Penuballi Suryam and Another AND ...Petitioners {$' The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department secretariat, saifiabad, Hyderabad and B others {'lr ...Respondents o Aggrieved by the action of respondent Nos.3 and 4 in not providing police Aid on the petitioner's representation dated 22'L1.2o25 and also not implementing porice Aid order granted on 06.02.2018 in I.A.No.S7 of 20rg in o.s.No.4o5 of 2016 on the Iile of learned Sub-Divisionar Magistrate (Mobile court) at \ '\a €4 : I Bhadrachatam for harvesting the petitioners' crops in their land 2 admeasuring Ac. lO-42 cents and were covered by RS.Nos.Il6/45 and 1 16 / L /36 (hereinafter referred as "subject property") situated in Rachannagudem Revenue Village, Mulakalampalli Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District, the present writ petition is filed. A consequential prayer is sought to direct the respondent Nos.3 and 4 to implement the said Police Aid Order.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioner No.1 is in possession of the subject property and the said property belongs to their ancestors and the petitioner was in possession and cultivating the above subject properly without interruption by anyone at any point of time. It is further sr:bmitted that when the third parties and their henchmen interfered with the petitioner's possession in respect of the subject land, the petitioner filed o.S.No.405 of 2016 on the file of Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Mobile court) at Bhadrachalam for grant of permanent injunction restraining third parties and their henchmen not to interfere with the petitioner's possession. It is further submitted that during the pendency of the suit, the petitioner filed I.A.No.443 of 2oL6 in o.s.No-4o5 of 2ot6 for grant of temporary injunction. The sub- {b c:!ri o \i 3 Divisional Magistrate & Special Assistant Agent to Government, Mobile Court, Bhadrachalam (hereinafter referred as "trial court") granted temporar5r injunction uide its order dated 20.09.2016 restraining the d.efend.ants and their henchmen not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of the subject property titl further orders. Thereafter, the petitioner filed application uide I.A.No.S7 of 2018 in I.A.No.443 of 2016 in O.S.No.4OS of 2016 seeking Police Protection in respect of the subject property. The trial court uid.e its ord.er dated 06.O2.2018 directed the respond.ents /defendants not to interfere with the peaceful possession. of the petitioner / plaintiff and also d.irected the Police to provide police protection in the schedule property till further orders. It is further submitted that the petitioner made a representation to respondent No.4 requesting to provide police protection for harvesting their crops and to comply the orders of the trial court passed on 06.02.2018. It is further submitted that though a representation was made to respondent No.4, no action has been taken and no police protection has been granted to the petitioners. I I l I i. 4 (r; -l

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.-l to 4 submitted that since the trial court has granted police prote-ption and a representation to that effect has been submitted by the petitioners on 22.11.2025, the respondent No.4 would consider the Same and grant police aid to the petitioners in respect of the subject property.

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4.

5. Recording the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, this. writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.4 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.11.2025 and take appropriate action in the light of the orders by the trial court in I.A.No.S7 of 2018 in I.A.No.443 of 2016 in o.S.No.4o5 of 2o16 on

06.09.2018.

6. with the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of with consent of learned counsel for the petitioner and. learned Assistant Government pleader for Home. There shall be no order k,v as to costs. /-] I I' i i I 5 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications if any pending in this petition, shall stand closed. S -4 /TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Secretariat pal Secretary to Government, Home Hyderabad

1. The Princi Saifabad, 2. The Superintendent of Police, Bhadradri Kothag udem District at Kothagudem' e' 3.TheCirclelnspectorofPolice,fi/ulakalampalliCircle,tVlulakalampalliVillage 4. The Sub - lnspector of Police,.tVlulakalampalli Police Station' Mulakalampalli r' ;il tt/;;dat, dnaoradri Kothagudem District' vii;g";..i ft/l;il;' gnaoraoii Kothagudem District'

5.oneCCtoSRlPANGASIVANARAYANA,Advocate.toPUC] 6. Two QCs to GP FOR HOME, High court for the sta'te of Telangana' [oUT] 7. Two CD CoPies .BSK BS :* HIGH COURT DATED i1011212025 t I i. E tt$ Ttt () $t i'.r.. ,.-......'- ,;, -*"- -._ _ .. ? ORDER WP.No.37016 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \o .rk