High Court · 2025

Petition under Section '151 CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the respondents to provide the informalion in view of Articte 243c of Constitution of lndian and Section 11,17 of Telangana panchayat Raj Act about what is grace period or duration for declaration of reservations before election notification and to place before this Hon'ble court, about report of Backward Class reservation report in State Election Notification No..1095/TGSE C-pRl2O2S, reservation repo( of Backward class conducted in state Election Notification 20'13, reservation report of Backward Class conducted in State Election Notification 20 19 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BASKULA ATHIK Counsel foi the Respondents: SRI ASUDARSHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF I ELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SANI KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCI SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO W.P.No.37002 of 202 5

04.12.202s Bctrveen Tclangana IIC Sankshema Sangam, Rcgd. No. 10ti/2010. Rep. by its State presidenr Mckapothula Narender Goud, Office at: B.C.Bhavan H.No.3-6-427l1. 2"d Floor, St.No.4 ancl 5, Be side I Iyderabad. .lcwr:iers, Himayathnagar, -I'aruni AND .l)etitioner 'f hc State of 1'elangana, Rcp. by its Principal Secretary (Social Welfare), Se ,. rerariat $)ildings. Hyderabad and J7 otheYs. ... {espondents OItDER, (per iton'ble Sri Justice p.Sam Koshy) Heard N4r. Baskula Athik, leamed counsel for:, e petitioner ancl Mr. A.Sudalshan Reddy, learned Advocate Ge r :ral lor the respondents. Perused the record. \-- - L-- )

2. The present is a writ petition which has been filed seeking for issuance for writ of quo warranto.

3. The relief sought for is against respondent Nos.7 to 38, who are District Collectors of 3 t districts in the State of Telangana. The petitioner seems to be more aggrieved of the allocation and reservation of backward class seats in the forthcoming gram panchayat elections.

4. At the outset, we are not inclined to entertain the writ petition, firstly on account ol the specific bar under Article 243-0 of the Constitution of India. Secondly, lor the reason that the election notification having already been published on 25.11'2025 and once the election notification has already been published and election process has also cotnmenced, it would not be, at this j uncture, permissible for the writ Court to entertain the nature of grievance raised by the petitioner. Thirdly, for the reason that a quo warranto could had been issued in the event if the petitioner would have challenged the authority of respondent Nos'7 to 38 insofar as hotding the office of the District Collectors which is not \- !- 3 the grievance nor is it the relief sought, for which e so the writ of quo warranto would not be maintainable. 5 For all the al'oresaid reasons, we are declirrrr c l.o enteftain the writ petition. However, the right of the petitiorr - would stand reserved to avail such other remedies as would be av rilabte to him under law 6 Thc writ petirion is accordingly dismissed. Th:.e shall be no oltler as to costs. Consecluently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPY// Ass r rAN?D#%,3YRXA ;EcIi6ToFFIcER 1 2 J One CC to SRt BASKULA ATH|K, Advocate.[OpUC] Iy.""rtt;ii6lvocArE GENERAL, Hish court for the ri rte of reransana at Two CD Copies BSR BS +y HIGH COURT DATED: 0411212025 ORDER WP.No.37002 of 2025 / O (-) \) t .ll1i * 0t :. ----. -,')r'- DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS a