High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 not to interfere in civil disputes and force the Petitioner to settle the civil dispute with the Respondent Nos.4 to 6 and hand over the premises i.e. the shop and Permit Room to be run at Survey No.268. Gaddiannaram Village, Saroor Nagar Mandal, Nalgonda District to the Respondents Nos.4 to 6 pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.K.MAHENDER REDDY PERI PRABHAKAR Gounsel for the Respondent No.l to 3: SRI R.LAXMIKANTH REDDY, AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER i I I ! I I I I '1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION N0.371710F 2025 DATE I 04.12.2025 Between: Naga Jyothi Thalla AND The State of Telangana & Others ...Petitioner ... Respondents ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Arlicle 226 of Constitution of lndia seeking the following relief: "...to ,.ssue a writ, order or dircction, more padicularly one in the nature of Wit of Mandamus, declaing the action of the Respondent No.3 in forcing the Petitioner to seftle the civil dispute with Respondenls 4 to 6 and handover premtses i.e. shop and Permit Room to be run by the Petitioner at Survey No.268' Gaddiannaram Vittage, Saroor Nagar Mandal, Nalgonda District to them as ahitrary, iltegat and highhanded and ansequently direct the Respoident No.3 not to inbrtere in civil dispute or force the Petitioner to settte the civil dispute with the Respondents 4 to 6 and hand over the premises i.e. shop and Permit Rcc,m to be run by the Petitioner at Suvey No.268, Gaddiannaram Village, Saroor Nagar Mandal, Nalgonda District to the Respondents 4 to 6 and pass-....."

2. Heard Mr. K.K.Mahender Reddy Peri Prabhakar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Laxmikanth Reddy, learned !- \-- 2 Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents No.1 to 3.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, without there being any lawful basis, respondent No. 3 has been interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents concerning the permit room premises, and has been insisting that the petitioner hand over the said premises. Hence, the present petition has been filed seeking appropriate directions against the unofficial respondents.

4.1. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submits that respondent No. 3 has never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties, and that the allegations regarding any pressure on the petitioner to hand over the premises to the unofficial respondents are baseless and unfounded.

4.2. He further submits that, as per the available records, no complaint or FIR has been registered or is pending in respect of the subject property. lt is therefore contended that the petitioner's allegations of interference are fabricated and intended solely to obtain a favourable order. Accordingly, dismissal of the petition has been sought.

5. I have perused the material available on record. I \ J

6. The specific grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No' 3 is interfering with his possession over the permit room premises' which is the subject of a civil dispute between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. The explanation offered by the respondent police authorities indicates that no crime has been registered, nor are any proceedings pending in relation to the premises or against the petitioner.

7. That being the position, and as the nature of the alleged interference is purely civil in nature, respondent No' 3 is directed to refrain from interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents regarding possession of the subject premises, except in strict accordance with law and by following due process.

8. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of' There shall be no order as to costs. neous Petition if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/- C. DEEPIKA ISTANT REGISTRAR SECT]ON OFFICER at, Hyderabad, State of To, 1 . The Principal Secretary' Home Department' Telangana.

2. The Commissioner' HYderabad. Rachakonda Police Commissionerate' L'B' Nagar'

3. The Station House Officer' P'S' Saroornagar' 4. One CC to SRI K'K'MAHENDER REDDY Ranga ReddY District' PERI PRABHAKAR, Advocate q loPUCl Two CCs to GP FOR HOME' High Court for the State of Telangana at ' Hyderabad [OUTI

6. Two CD CoPies B:F q, rrv HIGH COURT DATED i 04112l,2025 ORDER WP.No.37171 ot 2025 ii{h. Sin ( L., C) 150ErM t;l * * Fr.A rCH DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS