High Court · 2025

4. The Tahsildar, Srirampur Mandil, peddapalli District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF I\4ANDAIMUS to declare the action of the respondents in trying to delete the petitioners survey number in Bhu Bharathi portal (Record of Rights) in respect of land admeasuring Ac.2.08 gts in Sy.No.167tAl2"situated at Srirampur Village and [Mapdal, Peddapalli District without giving any notice, without following due process of law and without giving opportunity, as iilegal, arbitrary and against to the provisions of Bhu Bharathi Act and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents not to delete the petitioner's survey number in respect of above subject lands. o: 't oF 2025 / Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to delete the petitioners survey number in respect of land admeasuring Ac.2.0B gts in Sy.No.167/A/2 situated at Srirampur Village and Mandal, Peddapalli District on Bhu Bharati Portal (Record of Rights), pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI Y.ASHOK RAJ Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER r HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL IIIRIT ON No. of 2025, DATE OF ORDER: O4. L2.2O25 BETWEEN: Sangam Naveen AND ... Petitioner The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department and 3 others. I'i : (IRDER: ------_ ... Respondents This Writ Petition is niba under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following.relief/s:- "...to issue a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in trying to delete the petitioners survey number in Bhu Bharathi portal Record of Rights in respect of land admeasuring Ac.2.0B gts in Sy.No.167 /A/2, situated at Srirampur Village and Mandal, Peddapalli District, without giving any notice, without following due process of law and without giving opportunity as illegal, arbitrary and against to the provisions of Bhu Bharathi Act and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to delete the petitioners survey number in respect of above subject lands.. :" I 2

2. Heard Mr.Y.Ashok Raj, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents. perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner is the bona fid.e purchaser uid.e registered sale deed No.927 /2024, duly registered on 19.12.2024 and legitimate title holder of the agriculture land admeasuring Ac.2.oB guntas in sy.No. L67 /A/2, situated at Srirampur Village and Mandal, Peddapalli Districtn and issued pattedar passbook uid.e passbook No.T2o13o11oo5o, dated 2o.a4.2ol1. Based upon the said sale deed, a new pattedar passbook has been issued in favour of the petitioner uide pattedar passbook No.T2o13ol1191z, utd.e Khata No.60839 by respondent woi+ herein and the petitioner is in possession and enjoyment of the property. ^l I

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that on enquiry in Bhu Bharathi portal, it has come to the knowledge of the petitioner that the land in sy.No .16T /A/2 in respect of the pattedar passbook issued to the petitioner has been blocked. Upon further enquiry in the same Bhu Bharathi portal, it is sho\^rn as "ongoing transactions on survey number/ sub-divi"r6rf under process in deretion of fictitious survey ,,/ ,/ t ,/3 process". without issuing any notice to the petitioner, the respondent authorities are attempting to delete his name from the revenue records, at the behest of unknown persons. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed an application under Right to Information Act to Revenue Divisional officer respondent No.3, while furnishing the said information uid.e No.D 1 / 35rs /2025, dated 3 1 . 1 o.2o2s, respondent No.3 stated that the information is pertaining to the office of the Tahsildar, srirampura. Accordingly, und& Section 6(3) of the RTI Act, 2005, the matter is relegated to the Tahsildar for granting information as sought by the petitioner. Till now, no information has been issued to the petitioner.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the main grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent authorities are trying to delete the narne of the petitioner in sy.No.167/A/2, without issuing any notice, which is violation of principles of natural justice and the valuable right of the petitioner as guaranteed under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India shall be defeated and the petitioner is put to irreparable loss. Hence, he would seek to pass appropriate order. i i I It 4 \ 6' On the other hand, learned Assistant Government pleader '''. for Revenue would submit that in respect of the apprication made by the applicant uide application No.SD2sooOo 6260, the enquiry is under process in deletion of fictitious survey process. Accordingly, the same status has been uploaded in the online portal. He would further submit that if any objections raised by the petitioner, wourd be taken into consideration while passing the final order in respect of the said application. Hence, he would seek to pass appropriate orders. 7 - Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue and upon examination of the materials praced before this court, this court without going into merits or demerits of the case, is of the considered opinion that notice ought to have been issued to the petitioner on the apprication made by him vide application No. SD25 00006260. Accordingry, the petitioner is granted liberty to fire objection petition before the official respondents within two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, upon which, the official respondents shall examine the case of the petitioner and pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with I I I I i ir.rj 5 law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of the objection petition to be filed by the petitioner. Till such time, respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed not to take any adverse action on the application made by the petitioner uide application No.SD25O0OO626O. B. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Hyderabad, State of Telangana. . PONNA KRISHNA REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER Secretariat Buildings,

2. The District Collector, Peddapalli District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapalli Revenue Division, peddapalli District.

4. The Tahsildar, Srirampur [Vlandal, Peddapalli District. 5. One CC to SRI Y.ASHOK RAJ, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

7. Two CD CoPies BSR GJP E HIGH COURT DATEDi 0411212025 I I ORDER WP.No.37035 of 2025 . :': i A.l' 17 [L[ [m' Tr )t i DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS \a