The High Court · 2025

5. The Chief City Planner, GHTMC Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 6. Smt. S. Bharathi, W/o. S. Jagadeshwar, r/o H.No. 457lLtG,15-31-Vll-L-457, KPHB Colony, Phase Vll, Kukatpally, Hyderabad -72.

7. Radhika Kdthak, r/o H.No, 457lLlc, 15-31-Vlt-L-457, KPHB Cotony, Phase Vll, Kukatpally, Hyderabad -72.

8. Samudrala Kiran, S/o. S. Jagadeshwar r/o H.No. 4S7lLlG, 1 5-31 -V ll-L-457 , KPHB Colony, Phase Vll, Kukatpally, Hyderabad - 72. Cett. 9581234569 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, action of the respondent authoritres in not taking any action with regard to the illegal and unauthorized commercial construction (G(PLUS) 5 (PLUS) Pent House) made by the unofficial respondents in the premises bearing 15-31-Vll-L-457 in an extent of 98.66 sc . yds, KPHB Colony, Phase Vll, Kukatpally, Hyderabad -72 is in ufter violation cf the sanctioned plan without leaving proper setbacks and encroaching the public r)ad thereby causing blockage of roads by dumping the construction material ov') road, inspite of the written complaint dt. 1 4/1 112025 tollowed by personal vi:; s, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and u nconstitutiona I and consequently ciect the respondent authorities forthwith to pull down/demolish the illegal and unauthorized commercial construction made by the unofficial responderll ; in the above said premises. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Sectron 151 CPC praying that in the cit< the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court direct the respondent authorities to forthwith stop the constrr by the unofficial respondents in premises bearing H.No.1{ extent of 98.66 sq. yds, KPHB Colony, Phase Vll, Kukatpally revoke/cancel building permit Order No. 323742181'l 05.09.2023 by considering the petitioner's representation dt J mstances stated in may be pleased to {ion activities made -31-Vll-L-457 in an Hyderabad - 72 by stG1t{ict2023 Dt

4.11.2025, pendrng disposal of the main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KAMALAKAR REDOY C. Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADI IINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPME.IT Counsel for the Respondents No.2 to 5: SRI K. RAVI MAHEI DER, S.C. FOR GHII ] The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HONOURABLE SRIJUSTTCE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3703I OF 2025 DATE OF ORDER: 04-12-2025 Between: P. Abhilash Reddy .... Petitioner AND The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, and seven others. ... Respondents ORDER This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of respondent No.3 - Deputy Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Circle No.23, Moosapet Circle, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, in not removing the unauthorized construction made by the unofficial respondents in the commercial building (Ground + 5 floors + pent house) bearing premises No.15-31-Vll-L-457 in an extent of

98.66 square yards situated at KPHB Colony, Phase Vll, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, pursuant to the complaint of the petitioner dated

14.11.2025. .,

2. Heard Mr. C. Kamalakar Reddy, learned counsel fc 'the petitioner, and Mr. K. Ravi Mahender, learned Standing Counsel for (i lMC, appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 5, and perused the material availab : on record.

3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for responc:nt Nos.2 to 5 submitted that on complaint of the petitioner, show cau: e notice dated

14.07.2025 was issued to respondent No.6/owner/occupior of the subject property stating that unauthorized construction was mad: by her, in the subject property, in deviation of the sanctioned pl,r r granted for construction of Stilt + 2 upper floors. Thereafter, opportL rity of hearing was given to respondent No.6, and order dated 37.07.2) l5 was passed directing respondent No.6 to remove the unauthorized co'l ;truction within 15 days.

4. According to the learned counsel for the petitior:r, respondent Nos.7 and 8 are the subsequent purchasers of the oroperty from respondent No.6.

5. As order dated 31.07.2025 was passed directing rr spondent No.6 to remove the unauthorized construction and as it is stah: I that the said order has not been complied with and also that so far, no pr Eeedings have been initiated challenging the said order before any legal F )rum, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.3 to imple,r rent the order dated 31.07:i025 by following due process of law. Furtir :r, respondent No.3 is directed to forthwith seal the unauthorized floors :onstructed by I I 3 respondent No.6, pending further action. As this order is passed without entering into the merits, notice to respondent Nos.6 to 8 is dispensed with. However, if respondent Nos.6 to 8 are in any way aggrieved by this order, they are at liberfy to seek modification of this order. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. SD/. AHMED ABDULLA K TANT R R //TRUE COPY// To 1 The Deoutv Commissioner, GHMC Circle No'23' nl1oosap'et, tUedchal-Malkajgiri District' ECTION OFFICER apet Circle, Office at

2. One CC to SRI KAMALAKAR REDDY C', Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration. and .Urban Development' High " cl]rrtl"'t ti" 5tat" ot i"tangana at Hvderabad louTl 4. One CC to SRI K. RAVI MAHENDER, S C for GHMC [OPUC] 5. Two CD CoPies [/P GJP HIGH COURT DATI:.D:0411212025 1ja E S14;. c i i '.-) r) ,., 1 2+ l]tl 2[ (! i, r. )r: .': iPi}:r.lii: :l' '.1 '' ORDER WP.No,37038 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE V\ RIT PETITION WII HOUT COSTS % a\ Irq