The High Court · 2025

8. Bantu Dathatreya @ Srikanth, S/o.Laxmi Narayana, Aged about 30 years, Occ. Private Employee, R/o. H. No. 8-4-3671257-1, Vinayak Rao Nagar, Borabanda, Hyderabad, Balanagar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State - 500018. Aadhaar Card No. 51742856 8775

9. Patteti Rahul, S/o.Patteti Bhaskar, Aged about 30 years, Occ. Private Employee, Fi/o. H. No. 8-4-370i375, Borabanda, Raj Nagar, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State -500018. Cell rl Card No. 82223126 4538 tO1144131 Aadhaar 1 0. Namindla Akshay Kumar, S/o. Namindla Kumaraswa r years, Occ. Private Service, Ri/o. H.No. B_4-36gt16gtt Borabanda, Near pochamma Temple, UyaeriniO, Ra lg|-angana State - 500018. Ceil 8 j79339S'+e AaJhaar c 7964 ry, Aged about 26 l, Madhura Nagar, rga Reddy District, ard No. 5102 8269

11. Mohammed Faisal, S/o. Mohammed lqbal, Aqed about 2t Service, R/o. H.No. 14-1-129t29, ea'dmiva"ttri f,ligar, fty9gtgQuQ, Ranga Reddy District, reijnoani s:; 96402'10188 Aadhaar Card No. 9539 7760 376b!3 years, Occ. Private iorabanda, Allapur, te- 500018. Celt AND ...Petitioners/Accused ,los. 1,2,5,6,7 to 13 '1 . State of Telanqana, Represented by public prosecutor, F i rh Court Of Judicature for Telangana State

2. Sri.Rama-giri Rajaiah., S/o.Laxmipathi, Aged about 72 yea.:, Occ.Tailor, Ri/o. - - ' "- H.No 4-32t41t.129lA, Ailwyn Cotony, Krikatpitiy, nyObrarr d ...Respondents/De- acto Complainant Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in he circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminll Fetition, rte High Co;,1 ;"y be pleased to Therefore, it is prayed that the court be pre: sed Io euash the proceedings in c.c.No.72i20'lB for the alleged offences unde- iec.452 , 42l , so6 r/w.34 lPConthefileof the Xll Additional-chiefJudicial Magir trateri'lrrrprrrv, -.r"n H.yderabad against the petitioners/Accused No's. 1,2,5,6,7 ti ta anJ pr., other order or orders as this court deems fit and pioper in tht circumstances of the case in the interests of Justice. l.A. NO:1 OF 2025 Petition under section 529 of BNSS praying that in t re circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminir Fetition, 1.,, High c;;,1 ;ry be pleased to stay aI further proceedings incruding personar i ppearance of the petitioners in c.c.No.72l2018 on the fite or the"xt Additio al chief LuJiciat Magistrate at Nampaily, Hyderabad pending disposar of thr: main putition to. quashing the same. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing th: Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the argumr:r ts of Mr. T.c.K. Singh, Advocate for the petitioners and the Mr. V. Jithendar Ra , Assistant pubric Prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No.1 and of None rppeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER ?/ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT I{YDERABA.D THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENWAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No. 15972 of 2o25 Datez 11.12.2o25 Between: Mohd. Tanveer Khan @ Mohd.Meeraj Khan @ Tannu and 1O others. AND The State of Telangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature for Telangana State and another. ORDER ..Petitioners ...Respondents This Criminal Petition has been frled for seeking quash the proceedings in C.C.No.72 of 2Ol8 on the flle of the Iearned XII Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad wherein the petitioners were arrayed as accused Nos. 1,2,5,6,

7. to 13 for the offences punishable under Sections 452, 427, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Pena-l Code (for short'IPCJ.

2. Heard Mr. T.C.K.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.V.Jithendar Rao, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No. 1/ State. I I \ -:+--i - .)

3. Although the learned counsel for the p' titioners has raised several grounds but restricted his pral't r for seeking expedite disposal, as the entire trial has been ccr rpleted before the trial Court.

4. ln view of the above said submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, without expres ;ing any view, the learned XII Additional Chief Judicial l {agistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad is directed to expedite the 1 roceedings as early as possible and the Court below is directt:t to cooperate with the disposal of the case.

5. With the above said direction, the Crim;r al Petition is disposed of. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, p: rding if any, stand closed. Sd/- N. CHAi\ DRA SEKHAR RAO T) :PUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Xll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Namrr rlly, Hyderabad. 2. The lll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Namp€ ly, Hyderabad. 3. The Station House Officer, Central crime Station, Hyderirt ad. 4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, State of Telangana, I igh Court Buildings, at Hyderabad (OUT)

5. One CC to Sri. Thakur Chandra Kamal Singh, Advocate [ )PUC] 6. Two CD Copies DUSA t,^ry I I HIGH COURT DATED:1 111212025 ORDER CRLP.No.15972 of 2025 iilri. ran t),* ;it I i 0i[ 2rI5 ':) \.', l' ,: l,I i- \.,:t-, r4.r .: :J:. r..- \:--' ,' CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISPOSED OF q 1 3b 1,6