M/s. Adi Jambava Dalitha Sanitary and Civil LCPSSS Limited v. The Commissioner, Jangaon Municipality, Jangaon, Warangal District
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ,TRUE COPY' SD/- C. DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGISTRARa SECTION OFFICER I To, 'l . One CC to SRI S.JAGADISH' Advocate. IOPUC]…
Judgment
Cause title
M/s. Adi Jambava Dalitha Sanitary and Civil LCPSSS Limited, Rep by its President Sri J.Kumar, Sio. Ir,/allaiah, Aged about 40 years, Occ Civil Contractor, R/o. H.NO.4- 8-29lA, Dharmakancha, Jangaon Municipal Limits, Jangaon, Warangal Districl506 lOr/. ,..PETITIONER
AND 1 2 3 4 5 The Commissioner, Jangaon Municipality, Jangaon, Warangal District. The Chair Person, Municipal Council, Jangaon Municipality, Jangaon, Warangal District. The Government of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal, Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Circle, Warangal, Warangal District. D.Shashikanth, S/o. Sri Hari, Aged about 35 years, Occ Civil Contractor, Ganesh Street, Beside Siral Fruits Company, Jangaon, Warangal District ...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue a Writ, Order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in entrusting the entire civil works to the 5th respondent vide e-procurement tender notice NO.E1 1127512014 and E 1/SLUM/141612013-14 dated 21.06.2014 of the 1st respondent contrary to G.O.Ms.No.70 dated 12.08.2009 and set aside the e-procurement tender notice NO.El1127512014 and E1ISLUM/141612013-14 dated 21.06.2014 of the'1st respondent by declaring the same as void, illegal, arbitrary and u nconstitutional and contrary to G.O.Ms.No.70 dated 12.08.2009 and consequently direct the 1st v- ".ti: ._. . ;iarr;!- respondent to implement G.O.Ms.No.70 dated 12.08.2009 for entrustment of Civil Contracts in the Jangaon lrtl u n icipality. LA. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 32027 OF 20141 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the e-procurement tender notice NO.E11127512014 & E1/SLUIV/141612013-14 dated 21.06.2014 of the 15t respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI S.JAGADISH Counsel for the Respondents No.1&2 : SRI D.BHASKAR REDDY, SC FOR MC Counsel for the Respondent No.3&4 : GP FOR MCPL ADMN-URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : SRI B.MOHAN The Court made the following: ORDER a.l {arr 2', , HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION No.25624 of 2014
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel lor the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous.
Operative part
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ,TRUE COPY' SD/- C. DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGISTRARa SECTION OFFICER I To, 'l . One CC to SRI S.JAGADISH' Advocate. IOPUC] 2. One CC to SRI D.BHASKAR REDDY, SC for MC,TELANGANA) tOPUCl
TwoCCstoGPFORMCPLADMN-URBANDEV,HighCourtfortheStateof Telangana. [OUT]
One CC to SRI B.MOHAN, Advocate. [OPUC]
Two CD CoPies. BSK GJPw I, ". .e \4t. )1 - I ( ', ir't. S l.. (J\ o \) t 2 B 0[I 21t6 I ;.' , /, ..2 .i/ s',, HIGH COURT DATED:1810812025 ORDER WP.No.25624 of 2014 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS $ .s w-, d*w I E!
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.